The need for EIA theory-building

Abstract Environmental impact assessment (EIA) practice has evolved without a sound conceptual foundation. More reflective practice and more coherent theory-building are required. An EIA perspective is offered on the nature, role, and types of theory, theory levels, the relationship of theory and practice, and the analysis-synthesis process. EIA theory-building is depicted as directed, rigorous, practical, evolving, heuristic, collaborative, risky, uncertain, complex, critical, reflective, designed, value-full, ethical, political, pluralistic, contingent, boundary-spanning, constrained, and opportunistic. Implications of each theory-building characteristic for EIA theory-building and practice are assessed, and priorities are identified.

[1]  Stan L. Albrecht,et al.  Equity and justice in environmental decision making: A proposed research agenda , 1995 .

[2]  P. Hartel,et al.  Ethics and environmental policy : theory meets practice , 1994 .

[3]  Amitai Etzioni.  The active society , 1968 .

[4]  C. Mills.  The Sociological Imagination , 1959 .

[5]  Ernest R. Alexander,et al.  Interorganizational Coordination: Theory and Practice , 1993 .

[6]  D. P. Lawrence.  Designing and adapting the EIA planning process , 1994 .

[7]  Peter H. Fricke,et al.  Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment , 1995 .

[8]  John Formby,et al.  THE POLITICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT , 1990 .

[9]  Maryanne M. Gobble,et al.  Design Thinking , 2010, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible.

[10]  N. Knight,et al.  THE NEED FOR RETROSPECTIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE MEGAPROJECTS EXAMPLE , 1995 .

[11]  F. Leistritz.  ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT , 1994 .

[12]  A. Gouldner,et al.  The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology , 1971 .

[13]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[14]  T. J. Cartwright,et al.  Problems, Solutions and Strategies: A Contribution to the Theory and Practice of Planning , 1973 .

[15]  I. Craib.  Modern Social Theory , 1984 .

[16]  Elizabeth Howe,et al.  Normative Ethics in Planning , 1990 .

[17]  S. Amir.  Evaluation of environmental impacts of large scale physical development in central Galilee: Role of experts and policy makers , 1990 .

[18]  Ma. de la Natividad Jiménez Salas,et al.  The Conduct of Inquiry , 1967 .

[19]  K. Christensen.  Coping with Uncertainty in Planning , 1985 .

[20]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design method and scientific method , 1981 .

[21]  James Gleick.  Chaos: Making a New Science , 1987 .

[22]  Nigel Taylor,et al.  Planning Theory and the Philosophy of Planning , 1980 .

[23]  Henry C. Hightower.  Planning Theory in Contemporary Professional Education , 1969 .

[24]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[25]  A. Lex Brown.  Environmental impact assessment in a development context , 1990 .

[26]  Katherine Lyon.  FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLIC POLICY MAKERS' INTERPRETATION OF IMPACT ASSESSMENTS , 1990 .

[27]  David Schleicher,et al.  From proposal to decision: Suggestions for tightening up the “NEPA process” , 1985 .

[28]  Amos Rapoport,et al.  History and Precedent in Environmental Design , 1990, Springer US.

[29]  J. Kartez.  Rational Arguments and Irrational Audiences: Psychology, Planning, and Public Judgment , 1989 .

[30]  John M. Bryson,et al.  A Contingent Approach to Strategy and Tactics in Project Planning , 1979 .

[31]  C. Pickvance.  The Rise and Fall of Urban Movements and the Role of Comparative Analysts , 1985 .

[32]  Richard S. Bolan,et al.  The Practitioner as Theorist The Phenomenology of the Professional Episode , 1980 .

[33]  T. J. Cartwright,et al.  Planning and Chaos Theory , 1991 .

[34]  Christiane Gagnon,et al.  Can SIA empower communities , 1993 .

[35]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  A Catholic Approach to Organizing What Urban Designers Should Know , 1992 .

[36]  A. E. Luloff,et al.  The value of using multiple methods: An illustration using survey, focus group, and Delphi techniques , 1995 .

[37]  Alan S. Miller.  The role of analytical science in natural resource decision making , 1993 .

[38]  Kenneth H. Reckhow,et al.  Importance of scientific uncertainty in decision making , 1994 .

[39]  Richard W. Butler,et al.  Post hoc assessment in resource management and environmental planning: A typology and three case studies , 1992 .

[40]  W. Dickerson,et al.  Substantive scientific and technical guidance for NEPA analysis: Pitfalls in the real world , 1993 .

[41]  J. K. Lein.  Formalizing expert judgment in the environmental impact assessment process , 1993 .

[42]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  Fact and Value in Planning , 1983 .

[43]  P. Wilding,et al.  Ideology and social welfare , 1976 .

[44]  Richard D. Margerum,et al.  Integrated Environmental Management: Moving from Theory to Practice , 1995 .

[45]  T. L. Harper,et al.  The Centrality of Normative Ethical Theory to Contemporary Planning Theory , 1992 .

[46]  Stephen W. Hwang,et al.  The Implications of the Nonlinear Paradigm for Integrated Environmental Design and Planning , 1996 .

[47]  R. Varkki George,et al.  Formulating the Right Planning Problem , 1994 .

[48]  G. A. Hillery,et al.  Advice and Planning , 1983 .

[49]  R Ellis.  The Practitioner as Theorist , 1970, Kango kenkyu. The Japanese journal of nursing research.

[50]  W. Freudenburg.  Social Impact Assessment , 2019, Rural Society in the U.S.: Issues for the 1980s.

[51]  Donna Harawy.  Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[52]  C. Geisler.  Rethinking SIA: why ex ante research isn't enough , 1993 .

[53]  M. Breheny.  A Practical View of Planning Theory , 1983 .

[54]  C. J. L. Yewlett,et al.  Polishing Practice — The Reconciliation of Scientists and Practitioners , 1984 .

[55]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[56]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[57]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[58]  A. Chase,et al.  Anthropology and impact assessment: Development pressures and indigenous interests in Australia , 1990 .

[59]  Guy Benveniste,et al.  Mastering the politics of planning , 1989 .

[60]  Environmentalism and the future of progressive politics , 1989 .

[61]  S. Ramamoorthy,et al.  The professional practice of environmental management , 1989 .

[62]  Leonard Ortolano,et al.  Controls on project proponents and environmental impact assessment effectiveness , 1993 .

[63]  Elizabeth Howe.  Role Choices of Urban Planners , 1980 .

[64]  B. Koppel.  Industrialization and assessment : Douglas Torgerson, York University Publications in Northern Studies, Toronto, Canada, 1980, 200 pp. , 1982 .

[65]  Donald N. Michael,et al.  Forecasting and planning in an incoherent context , 1989 .

[66]  L. G. Smith,et al.  Impact Assessment and Sustainable Resource Management , 1993 .

[67]  Julia E. Gardner,et al.  Decision making for sustainable development: Selected approaches to environmental assessment and management , 1989 .

[68]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  Environmental Ethics and Planning Theory , 1989 .

[69]  K. Mannheim,et al.  Ideology and Utopia. , 1940 .

[70]  E. Rochberg-Halton,et al.  Situation, Structure, and the Context of Meaning* , 1982 .

[71]  D. Kolb,et al.  Planning in the Face of Power. , 1988 .

[72]  R. Beattie,et al.  Everything you already know about EIA (but don't often admit) , 1995 .

[73]  Henry E. Kyburg,et al.  Science as Process. , 1993 .

[74]  Lawrence W. Barnthouse,et al.  Ecology, Impact Assessment, and Environmental Planning , 1986 .

[75]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[76]  Ralph P. Hummel,et al.  The Bureaucratic Experience , 1977 .

[77]  Donna Craig,et al.  Social impact assessment: Politically oriented approaches and applications , 1990 .

[78]  Anne Shepherd,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES , 1995 .

[79]  D. Hofstadter,et al.  Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid , 1979 .

[80]  M. Hollick.  Self-organizing systems and environmental management , 1993 .

[81]  John O. Kakonge,et al.  Constraints on implementing environmental impact assessments in Africa , 1993 .

[82]  James J. Kay,et al.  ------------------------------------------------------------------------Embracing Complexity : The Challenge of the Ecosystem Approach , 1994 .

[83]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  From Social Theory to Policy Design , 1984, Journal of Public Policy.

[84]  Richard S. Bolan,et al.  The Structure of Ethical Choice In Planning Practice , 1983 .

[85]  A. Stinchcombe.  Constructing Social Theories , 1970 .

[86]  K. Lynch.  Good city form , 1984 .

[87]  Tom Campbell.  Seven theories of human society , 1981 .

[88]  David E. Burmaster,et al.  A discussion on the use of probabilistic risk assessment in human health impact assessment , 1994 .

[89]  Sam H. Ham,et al.  A planning and decision-making framework for ecological restoration , 1995 .

[90]  L. W. Canter,et al.  Pragmatic suggestions for incorporating risk assessment principles in EIA studies , 1993 .

[91]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[92]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODS IN DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES , 1992 .

[93]  Patton Sawicki Clark,et al.  Basic methods of policy analysis and planning , 1986 .

[94]  Atul Wad,et al.  Technology assessment , 1984 .

[95]  Peter N. Duinker,et al.  AN ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN CANADA. , 1983 .

[96]  Patrick C. West,et al.  Social impact assessment and environmental conflict management: Potential for integration and application , 1990 .

[97]  Erik Lykke.  Achieving environmental goals : the concept and practice of environmental performance review , 1992 .

[98]  R. Rickson,et al.  Social impact assessment: Knowledge and development , 1990 .

[99]  B. Wynne.  Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. , 1992 .

[100]  Marios Camhis,et al.  Planning theory and philosophy , 1980 .

[101]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  Design for evolution : Erich Jantsch, George Braziller, Inc., N.Y., 1975, 322 pp., $9.95 cloth, $5.95 paper , 1975 .

[102]  John Forester,et al.  Critical Theory and Planning Practice , 1980 .

[103]  K. Popper.  Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[104]  Audrey Armour,et al.  INTEGRATING IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN THE PLANNING PROCESS: From Rhetoric to Reality , 1990 .

[105]  Kim Giffin,et al.  Decision-making group interaction , 1978 .

[106]  K. Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Ecology and Environmental Problem Solving , 1995 .

[107]  Christopher Alexander,et al.  A New Theory of Urban Design , 1989 .

[108]  M. Rein.  Social Policy Analysis as the Interpretation of Beliefs , 1971 .

[109]  Michael Peter Smith.  The City and Social Theory , 1981 .

[110]  Martin Auster,et al.  Fatal remedies: the sources of ineffectiveness in planning , 1989 .

[111]  Alvin M. Weinberg,et al.  Science and trans-science. , 1972 .

[112]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  A Public Interest Criterion , 1980 .