The Effect of Material Fresh Properties and Process Parameters on Buildability and Interlayer Adhesion of 3D Printed Concrete

The advent of digital concrete fabrication calls for advancing our understanding of the interaction of 3D printing with material rheology and print parameters, in addition to developing new measurement and control techniques. Thixotropy is the main challenge associated with printable material, which offers high yield strength and low viscosity. The higher the thixotropy, the better the shape stability and the higher buildability. However, exceeding a minimum value of thixotropy can cause high extrusion pressure and poor interface bond strength if the printing parameters are not optimized to the part design. This paper aims to investigate the effects of both material and process parameters on the buildability and inter-layer adhesion properties of 3D printed cementitious materials, produced with different thixotropy and print head standoff distances. Nano particles are used to increase the thixotropy and, in this context, a lower standoff distance is found to be useful for improving the bond strength. The low viscosity “control” sample is unaffected by the variation in standoff distances, which is attributed to its flowability and low yield stress characteristics that lead to strong interfacial bonding. This is supported by our microscopic observations.

[1]  David J. Corr,et al.  The thixotropic behavior of fresh cement asphalt emulsion paste , 2016 .

[2]  Jerzy Hoła,et al.  Multi-sensor evaluation of the concrete within the interlayer bond with regard to pull-off adhesion , 2018 .

[3]  G.V.P. Bhagath Singh,et al.  Quantitative XRD Analysis of Binary Blends of Siliceous Fly Ash and Hydrated Cement , 2016 .

[4]  Guang Ye,et al.  Effect of Moisture Exchange on Interface Formation in the Repair System Studied by X-ray Absorption , 2015, Materials.

[5]  Olivier Baverel,et al.  Classification of building systems for concrete 3D printing , 2017 .

[6]  Freek Bos,et al.  Hardened properties of 3D printed concrete: The influence of process parameters on interlayer adhesion , 2019, Cement and Concrete Research.

[7]  K. Subramaniam,et al.  Method for Direct Determination of Glassy Phase Dissolution in Hydrating Fly Ash‐Cement System Using X‐ray Diffraction , 2017 .

[8]  Ming Jen Tan,et al.  Time gap effect on bond strength of 3D-printed concrete , 2018, Virtual and Physical Prototyping.

[9]  B. Toby.  R factors in Rietveld analysis: How good is good enough? , 2006, Powder Diffraction.

[10]  Karen L. Scrivener,et al.  A Practical Guide to Microstructural Analysis of Cementitious Materials , 2015 .

[11]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  Digital Concrete: Opportunities and Challenges , 2016 .

[12]  Kah Fai Leong,et al.  3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review , 2017 .

[13]  B. Šavija,et al.  Micromechanical study of the interface properties in concrete repair systems , 2014 .

[14]  Behrokh Khoshnevis,et al.  Effects of interlocking on interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in 3D printing of concrete , 2017 .

[15]  Chen,et al.  Limestone and Calcined Clay-Based Sustainable Cementitious Materials for 3D Concrete Printing: A Fundamental Study of Extrudability and Early-Age Strength Development , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[16]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  Rheological requirements for printable concretes , 2018, Cement and Concrete Research.

[17]  Ming Xia,et al.  Effect of surface moisture on inter-layer strength of 3D printed concrete , 2018 .

[18]  Ming Jen Tan,et al.  Investigation of the rheology and strength of geopolymer mixtures for extrusion-based 3D printing , 2018, Cement and Concrete Composites.

[19]  Erik Schlangen,et al.  An approach to develop printable strain hardening cementitious composites , 2019, Materials & Design.

[20]  Ye Qian,et al.  Enhancing thixotropy of fresh cement pastes with nanoclay in presence of polycarboxylate ether superplasticizer (PCE) , 2018, Cement and Concrete Research.

[21]  Sara Mantellato,et al.  Hydration and rheology control of concrete for digital fabrication: Potential admixtures and cement chemistry , 2018, Cement and Concrete Research.

[22]  Brian A. Eick,et al.  Investigation of Concrete Mixtures for Additive Construction , 2017, 3D Concrete Printing Technology.

[23]  A. Gibb,et al.  Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete , 2012 .

[24]  Ming Jen Tan,et al.  Rheological behavior of high volume fly ash mixtures containing micro silica for digital construction application , 2019, Materials Letters.

[25]  Behrokh Khoshnevis,et al.  Construction by Contour Crafting using sulfur concrete with planetary applications , 2016 .

[26]  Ian Gibson,et al.  A review of 3D concrete printing systems and materials properties: current status and future research prospects , 2018 .

[27]  B. Panda,et al.  Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar , 2018 .

[28]  Ming Jen Tan,et al.  Improving the 3D printability of high volume fly ash mixtures via the use of nano attapulgite clay , 2019, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[29]  Ming Jen Tan,et al.  Fresh and hardened properties of 3D printable cementitious materials for building and construction , 2018 .

[30]  Ming Jen Tan,et al.  Mechanical properties and deformation behaviour of early age concrete in the context of digital construction , 2019, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[31]  T. Błaszczyński,et al.  Aspects of bond layer role in concrete repairs , 2006 .

[32]  David J. Corr,et al.  Study of the mechanisms underlying the fresh-state response of cementitious materials modified with nanoclays , 2012 .

[33]  K. van Breugel,et al.  Moisture movement in cement-based repair systems monitored by X-ray absorption , 2017 .

[34]  Jay G. Sanjayan,et al.  Method of Enhancing Interlayer Bond Strength in 3D Concrete Printing , 2018, RILEM Bookseries.

[35]  Xiaodong Wang,et al.  A Feasibility Study on HPMC-Improved Sulphoaluminate Cement for 3D Printing , 2018, Materials.

[36]  Ming Jen Tan,et al.  Experimental study on mix proportion and fresh properties of fly ash based geopolymer for 3D concrete printing , 2018, Ceramics International.

[37]  Tristan Lowe,et al.  Towards understanding the influence of porosity on mechanical and fracture behaviour of quasi-brittle materials: experiments and modelling , 2017, International Journal of Fracture.

[38]  N. Neithalath,et al.  Mechanical and microstructural characterization of alkali sulfate activated high volume fly ash binders , 2017 .

[39]  Freek Bos,et al.  Early age mechanical behaviour of 3D printed concrete: Numerical modelling and experimental testing , 2018 .

[40]  Behrokh Khoshnevis,et al.  Cementitious materials for construction-scale 3D printing: Laboratory testing of fresh printing mixture , 2017 .

[41]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Large-scale 3D printing of ultra-high performance concrete – a new processing route for architects and builders , 2016 .

[42]  B. Lothenbach,et al.  Supplementary cementitious materials , 2011 .

[43]  Freek Bos,et al.  Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing , 2016, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction.

[44]  Xiong Zhang,et al.  Effects of interface roughness and interface adhesion on new-to-old concrete bonding , 2017 .