Spatial correlations in vote statistics: a diffusive field model for decision-making

AbstractWe study the statistics of turnout rates and results of the French elections since 1992. We find that the distribution of turnout rates across towns is surprisingly stable over time. The spatial correlation of the turnout rates, or of the fraction of winning votes, is found to decay logarithmically with the distance between towns. Based on these empirical observations and on the analogy with a two-dimensional random diffusion equation, we propose that individual decisions can be rationalised in terms of an underlying “cultural” field, that locally biases the decision of the population of a given region, on top of an idiosyncratic, town-dependent field, with short range correlations. Using symmetry considerations and a set of plausible assumptions, we suggest that this cultural field obeys a random diffusion equation.

[1]  J. S. Andrade,et al.  Generalized Zipf's law in proportional voting processes , 2003 .

[2]  Cees van der Eijk,et al.  Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945 , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[3]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  An individual-based model of collective attention , 2009 .

[4]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications , 1990 .

[5]  Hans J. Herrmann,et al.  PLURALITY VOTING: THE STATISTICAL LAWS OF DEMOCRACY IN BRAZIL , 2006 .

[6]  Serge Galam,et al.  SOCIOPHYSICS: A REVIEW OF GALAM MODELS , 2008, 0803.1800.

[7]  Sven Banisch,et al.  On the Empirical Relevance of the Transient in Opinion Models , 2010, 1003.5578.

[8]  Oswaldo Morales-Matamoros,et al.  Mexican voter network as a dynamic complex system , 2006 .

[9]  Daniel M. Romero,et al.  An Epidemiological Approach to the Spread of Political Third Parties , 2009, 0911.2388.

[10]  D. Stau,et al.  Election results and the Sznajd model on Barabasi network , 2002 .

[11]  S. Galam,et al.  Towards a theory of collective phenomena: Consensus and attitude changes in groups , 1991 .

[12]  W. Ostwald.  Energetische Grundlagen Der Kulturwissenschaft , 1909 .

[13]  Hokky Situngkir,et al.  POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004 , 2004, nlin/0405002.

[14]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Of songs and men: a model for multiple choice with herding , 2006, physics/0606224.

[15]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[16]  J. S. Andrade,et al.  Brazilian elections: voting for a scaling democracy , 2003 .

[17]  Johannes J. Schneider,et al.  THE IMPACT OF ELECTION RESULTS ON THE MEMBER NUMBERS OF THE LARGE PARTIES IN BAVARIA AND GERMANY , 2005 .

[18]  Christian Borghesi.  Une étude de physique sur les élections , 2009 .

[19]  André de Palma,et al.  Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation , 1995 .

[20]  Crackling Noise and Avalanches: Scaling, Critical Phenomena, and the Renormalization Group , 2006, cond-mat/0612418.

[21]  G. Toulouse,et al.  Principe de moindre difficulté et structures hiérarchiques , 1978 .

[22]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Michael G. Sadovsky,et al.  Towards the Typology of Elections at Russia , 2007 .

[24]  Jean-Philippe Bouchaud,et al.  Theory of collective opinion shifts: from smooth trends to abrupt swings , 2005, cond-mat/0504079.

[25]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Crowd Disasters and Simulation of Panic Situations , 2002 .

[26]  Chung-I Chou,et al.  Growth Model for Vote Distributions in Elections , 2009, 0911.1404.

[27]  H. J. Herrmann,et al.  OPINION FORMATION ON A DETERMINISTIC PSEUDO-FRACTAL NETWORK , 2004 .

[28]  André Blais,et al.  To Vote or Not to Vote , 2000 .

[29]  E W Montroll,et al.  Social dynamics and the quantifying of social forces. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  S. Galam.  A new multicritical point in anisotropic magnets. III. Ferromagnet in both a random and a uniform field , 1982 .

[31]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[32]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Scaling and universality in proportional elections. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[33]  Melvin J. Hinich,et al.  Ideology and the theory of political choice , 1994 .

[34]  S. Franz,et al.  Ising model with memory: coarsening and persistence properties , 2008, 0804.1462.

[35]  M. Bussi.  Éléments de géographie électorale : À travers l'exemple de la France de l'Ouest , 1998 .

[36]  M. Batty.  Urban Modelling: Algorithms, Calibrations, Predictions , 2010 .

[37]  L. Kadanoff.  From simulation model to public policy , 1971 .

[38]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Brownian Agents and Active Particles: Collective Dynamics in the Natural and Social Sciences , 2003 .

[39]  H. Hern'andez-Saldana.  On the corporate votes and their relation with daisy models , 2008, 0810.0554.

[40]  J. S. Andrade,et al.  Scaling behavior in a proportional voting process. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[41]  Denis Phan,et al.  Discrete Choices under Social Influence:Generic Properties , 2007, 0704.2333.

[42]  William A. Brock,et al.  Discrete Choice with Social Interactions , 2001 .

[43]  Raj Kumar Pan,et al.  How a “Hit” is Born: The Emergence of Popularity from the Dynamics of Collective Choice , 2006 .

[44]  Erasmo Recami.  L'articolo di Ettore Majorana su "Il valore delle Leggi Statistiche nella Fisica e nelle Scienze Sociali" (Ettore Majorana's article on "The value of Statistical Laws in Physics and in Social Sciences") , 2007 .

[45]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  The power of a good idea: Quantitative modeling of the spread of ideas from epidemiological models , 2005, physics/0502067.

[46]  Dietrich Stauffer.  Opinion Dynamics and Sociophysics , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[47]  Mark S. Granovetter,et al.  Threshold models of diffusion and collective behavior , 1983 .

[48]  J. V. Holsteyn,et al.  Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945 , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[49]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[51]  H. Rieger,et al.  Anomalous diffusion in disordered media and random quantum spin chains , 1998 .

[52]  S. Galam.  Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T = 0 , 1997, cond-mat/9702163.