Towards High-Resolution First-Best Air Pollution Tolls

In this paper, an approach is presented to calculate high-resolution first-best air pollution tolls with respect to emission cost factors provided by Maibach et al. (2008). Dynamic traffic flows of a multi-agent transport simulation are linked to detailed air pollution emission factors. The monetary equivalent of emissions is internalized in a policy which is then used as a benchmark for evaluating the effects of a regulatory measure—a speed limitation to 30 km / h in the inner city of Munich. The calculated toll, which is equal to simulated marginal costs in terms of individual vehicle attributes and time-dependent traffic states, results in average air pollution costs that are very close to values in the literature. It is found that the regulatory measure is considerably less successful in terms of total emission reduction. It reduces emissions of urban travelers too strongly while even increasing the emissions of commuters and freight, both leading to a increase in deadweight loss. That is, the regulatory measure leads to higher market inefficiencies than a “do-nothing” strategy: too high generalized prices for urban travelers, too low generalized prices for commuters and freight. Finally, long-term changes in the vehicle fleet fuel efficiency are assumed as a reaction to the Internalization policy. The results indicate, however, that the long-term effect of emission reduction is dominated by the short-term reactions and by the assumed improvement in fleet fuel efficiency; the influence of the resulting route and mode choice decisions turns out to be relatively small.

[1]  W. Vickrey Congestion Theory and Transport Investment , 1969 .

[2]  A. Palma,et al.  A STRUCTURAL MODEL OF PEAK-PERIOD CONGESTION: A TRAFFIC BOTTLENECK WITH ELASTIC DEMAND. IN: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TRANSPORT ECONOMICS , 1993 .

[3]  C. Gawron,et al.  An Iterative Algorithm to Determine the Dynamic User Equilibrium in a Traffic Simulation Model , 1998 .

[4]  D Hassel,et al.  Determination of VOC-components in the exhaust of gasoline and diesel passenger cars , 1999 .

[5]  S. Proost,et al.  The welfare impacts of alternative policies to address atmospheric pollution in urban road transport , 2001 .

[6]  Anthony D. May,et al.  The Impact Of Road Pricing And Other Strategic Road Transport Initiatives On Urban Air Quality , 2002 .

[7]  Erik T. Verhoef,et al.  SECOND-BEST CONGESTION PRICING IN GENERAL NETWORKS. HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS FOR FINDING SECOND-BEST OPTIMAL TOLL LEVELS AND TOLL POINTS , 2002 .

[8]  T. Friesz,et al.  Dynamic Congestion Pricing in Disequilibrium , 2004 .

[9]  Kai Nagel,et al.  An Improved Framework for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Sim- ulations of Travel Behavior , 2004 .

[10]  R. Lindsey,et al.  Congestion Pricing with Heterogeneous Travelers: A General-Equilibrium Welfare Analysis , 2004 .

[11]  R. Follmer Mobilität in Deutschland: Ergebnisbericht , 2004 .

[12]  K. Nagel,et al.  Generating complete all-day activity plans with genetic algorithms , 2005 .

[13]  K. Small,et al.  Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax , 2005 .

[14]  Peter Gordon,et al.  Estimating Freight Flows for Metropolitan Area Highway Networks Using Secondary Data Sources , 2010 .

[15]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  A smart market for passenger road transport (SMPRT) congestion: An application of computational mechanism design , 2007 .

[16]  Nicolas Lefebvre,et al.  Fast shortest path computation in time-dependent traffic networks , 2007 .

[17]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Multi-agent transport simulations and economic evaluation , 2008 .

[18]  A. Namdeo,et al.  An empirical study of estimating vehicle emissions under cordon and distance based road user charging in Leeds, UK , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[19]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing , 2009 .

[20]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Long term fuel price elasticity , 2010 .

[21]  Kai Nagel,et al.  Towards a multi-agent based modeling approach for air pollutants in urban regions , 2011 .

[22]  K. Nagel,et al.  Income-contingent user preferences in policy evaluation: application and discussion based on multi-agent transport simulations , 2011 .

[23]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  High-resolution destination choice in agent-based demand models , 2011 .

[24]  K. Nagel,et al.  Behavioral Calibration and Analysis of a Large-Scale Travel Microsimulation , 2012 .

[25]  Kai Nagel,et al.  Computational Framework for Multiagent Simulation of Freight Transport Activities , 2012 .

[26]  K. Nagel,et al.  Rising car user costs: comparing aggregated and geo-spatial impacts on travel demand and air pollutant emissions , 2013 .

[27]  John M. Rose,et al.  Multimodal pricing and optimal design of urban public transport: The interplay between traffic congestion and bus crowding , 2014 .

[28]  E. Verhoef,et al.  Congestion pricing in a road and rail network with heterogeneous values of time and schedule delay , 2014 .