Prevalence of Pathogenic Germline Variants in Women with Non-Familial Unilateral Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Introduction: International guidelines recommend genetic testing for women with familial breast cancer at an expected prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PVs) of at least 10%. In a study sample of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC), we have previously shown that women with TNBC diagnosed before the age of 50 years but without a family history of breast or ovarian cancer (sTNBC) meet this criterion. The present study investigates the PV prevalence in BRCA1, BRCA2, and nine additional cancer predisposition genes in an extended sTNBC study sample including a cohort of women with a later age at sTNBC diagnosis. Patients and Methods: In 1,600 women with sTNBC (median age at diagnosis: 41 years, range 19–78 years), we investigated the association between age at diagnosis and PV occurrence in cancer predisposition genes using logistic regression. Results: 260 sTNBC patients (16.2%) were found to have a PV in cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1: n = 170 [10.6%]; BRCA2: n = 46 [2.9%], other: n = 44 [2.8%]). The PV prevalence in women diagnosed between 50 and 59 years (n = 194) was 11.3% (22/194). Logistic regression showed a significant increase in PV prevalence with decreasing age at diagnosis (OR 1.41 per 10 years younger age at diagnosis; 95% confidence interval: 1.21–1.65; p < 0.001). The PV prevalence predicted by the model was above 10% for diagnoses before the age of 56.8 years. Conclusion: Based on the data presented, we recommend genetic testing by gene panel analysis for sTNBC patients diagnosed before the age of 60 years. Due to the still uncertain estimate for women with sTNBC diagnosed above the age of 60 years, further studies are needed.

[1]  A. Meindl,et al.  Aktualisierte Kriterien des Deutschen Konsortiums Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs zur Klassifizierung von Keimbahn-Sequenzvarianten in Risikogenen für familiären Brust- und Eierstockkrebs , 2021, Senologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie.

[2]  E. Zabor,et al.  Breast Cancer in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Overview , 2020, Journal of cancer epidemiology.

[3]  Dieter Niederacher,et al.  Criteria of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer for the Classification of Germline Sequence Variants in Risk Genes for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer , 2020, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[4]  C. Forbes,et al.  A systematic review of the international prevalence of BRCA mutation in breast cancer , 2019, Clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Raymond M. Moore,et al.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Risk Genes Identified by Multigene Hereditary Cancer Panel Testing , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  Nina Ditsch,et al.  Gene panel testing of 5589 BRCA1/2‐negative index patients with breast cancer in a routine diagnostic setting: results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer , 2018, Cancer medicine.

[7]  A. Meindl,et al.  Prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutations among 802 women with unilateral triple-negative breast cancer without family cancer history , 2018, BMC Cancer.

[8]  David Evans,et al.  Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  Michael Jones,et al.  Age- and Tumor Subtype-Specific Breast Cancer Risk Estimates for CHEK2*1100delC Carriers. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Tanja Fehm,et al.  Prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in 21 401 families with breast and ovarian cancer , 2016, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[11]  A. Jakubowska,et al.  Clinical outcomes in women with breast cancer and a PALB2 mutation: a prospective cohort analysis. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  Brigitte Rack,et al.  Inherited mutations in 17 breast cancer susceptibility genes among a large triple-negative breast cancer cohort unselected for family history of breast cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  A. Godwin,et al.  Germline BRCA mutation evaluation in a prospective triple-negative breast cancer registry: implications for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome testing , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[14]  C. Vachon,et al.  Genetic susceptibility to triple-negative breast cancer. , 2013, Cancer research.

[15]  W. Chung,et al.  Genome-Wide Association Study in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers Identifies Novel Loci Associated with Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[16]  Sue Healey,et al.  ENIGMA—Evidence‐based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: An international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes , 2012, Human mutation.

[17]  W. Foulkes,et al.  Family history of cancer and cancer risks in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  A. Spurdle,et al.  Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results , 2008, Human mutation.

[19]  E. Gross,et al.  A highly sensitive, fast, and economical technique for mutation analysis in hereditary breast and ovarian cancers , 1999, Human mutation.

[20]  E. Gross,et al.  A comparison of BRCA1 mutation analysis by direct sequencing, SSCP and DHPLC , 1999, Human Genetics.

[21]  A. Agresti,et al.  Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions , 1998 .

[22]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .