Teaching an old scaffold new tricks: monobodies constructed using alternative surfaces of the FN3 scaffold.

The fibronectin type III domain (FN3) has become one of the most widely used non-antibody scaffolds for generating new binding proteins. Because of its structural homology to the immunoglobulin domain, combinatorial libraries of FN3 designed to date have primarily focused on introducing amino acid diversity into three loops that are equivalent to antibody complementarity-determining regions. Here, we report an FN3 library that utilizes alternative positions for presenting amino acid diversity. We diversified positions on a β-sheet and surface loops that together form a concave surface. The new library produced binding proteins (termed "monobodies") to multiple target proteins, generally with similar efficacy as the original, loop-focused library. The crystal structure of a monobody generated from the new library in complex with its target, the Abl SH2 domain, revealed that a concave surface of the monobody, as intended in our design, bound to a convex surface of the target with the interface area being among the largest of published structures of monobody-target complexes. This mode of interaction differs from a common binding mode for single-domain antibodies and antibody mimics in which recognition loops recognize clefts in targets. Together, this work illustrates the utilization of different surfaces of a single immunoglobulin-like scaffold to generate binding proteins with distinct characteristics.

[1]  H. Hogrefe,et al.  A bacteriophage lambda vector for the cloning and expression of immunoglobulin Fab fragments on the surface of filamentous phage. , 1993, Gene.

[2]  S. Koide Design And Engineering Of Synthetic Binding Proteins Using Nonantibody Scaffolds , 2009 .

[3]  Frederic A. Fellouse,et al.  High-throughput generation of synthetic antibodies from highly functional minimalist phage-displayed libraries. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Sachdev S Sidhu,et al.  Synthetic therapeutic antibodies , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[5]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  [20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[6]  A. Plückthun,et al.  High-affinity binders selected from designed ankyrin repeat protein libraries , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Shohei Koide,et al.  Exploring the capacity of minimalist protein interfaces: interface energetics and affinity maturation to picomolar KD of a single-domain antibody with a flat paratope. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  A. Skerra Alternative non-antibody scaffolds for molecular recognition. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[9]  Shohei Koide,et al.  A potent and highly specific FN3 monobody inhibitor of the Abl SH2 domain , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[10]  David W. Colby,et al.  A disulfide-free single-domain V(L) intrabody with blocking activity towards huntingtin reveals a novel mode of epitope recognition. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  R. Poljak,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of immunoglobulins. , 1979, Annual review of biochemistry.

[12]  J. Richardson,et al.  Natural β-sheet proteins use negative design to avoid edge-to-edge aggregation , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  S. Sidhu,et al.  Phage display for selection of novel binding peptides. , 2000, Methods in enzymology.

[14]  D. Leahy,et al.  All Mammalian Hedgehog Proteins Interact with Cell Adhesion Molecule, Down-regulated by Oncogenes (CDO) and Brother of CDO (BOC) in a Conserved Manner* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  David Reverter,et al.  Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMO–RanGAP1–Ubc9–Nup358 complex , 2005, Nature.

[16]  Bruce A. Johnson,et al.  NMR View: A computer program for the visualization and analysis of NMR data , 1994, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[17]  Corella S. Casas-Delucchi,et al.  Modulation of protein properties in living cells using nanobodies , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[18]  K D Wittrup,et al.  Yeast surface display for directed evolution of protein expression, affinity, and stability. , 2000, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  T. T. Wu,et al.  Length distribution of CDRH3 in antibodies , 1993, Proteins.

[20]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[21]  Shohei Koide,et al.  Isoform-specific monobody inhibitors of small ubiquitin-related modifiers engineered using structure-guided library design , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Andreas Plückthun,et al.  Engineered proteins as specific binding reagents. , 2005, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[23]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Engineering novel binding proteins from nonimmunoglobulin domains , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  Arash Bahrami,et al.  Probabilistic Interaction Network of Evidence Algorithm and its Application to Complete Labeling of Peak Lists from Protein NMR Spectroscopy , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[25]  I. Korndörfer,et al.  Structural mechanism of specific ligand recognition by a lipocalin tailored for the complexation of digoxigenin. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  Peter Briggs,et al.  A graphical user interface to the CCP4 program suite. , 2003, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[27]  Arne Skerra,et al.  Construction of an Artificial Receptor Protein (“Anticalin”) Based on the Human Apolipoprotein D , 2004, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[28]  L. Bloom,et al.  FN3: a new protein scaffold reaches the clinic. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[29]  A. Koide,et al.  The fibronectin type III domain as a scaffold for novel binding proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  A. Brunger Version 1.2 of the Crystallography and NMR system , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[31]  A. Koide,et al.  Monobodies: antibody mimics based on the scaffold of the fibronectin type III domain. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.

[32]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[33]  John B Wojcik,et al.  Accelerating phage-display library selection by reversible and site-specific biotinylation. , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[34]  S. Koide,et al.  NMR studies of Borrelia burgdorferi OspA, a 28 kDa protein containing a single-layer β-sheet , 1998, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[35]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[36]  Shohei Koide,et al.  The importance of being tyrosine: lessons in molecular recognition from minimalist synthetic binding proteins. , 2009, ACS chemical biology.

[37]  Shohei Koide,et al.  A Dominant Conformational Role for Amino Acid Diversity in Minimalist Protein-protein Interfaces Nih Public Access Introduction , 2022 .

[38]  Lode Wyns,et al.  Crystal structure of a camel single-domain VH antibody fragment in complex with lysozyme , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[39]  M. Tatham,et al.  Polymeric Chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 Are Conjugated to Protein Substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  L. Wyns,et al.  Molecular basis for the preferential cleft recognition by dromedary heavy-chain antibodies. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  A. Koide,et al.  Stabilization of a fibronectin type III domain by the removal of unfavorable electrostatic interactions on the protein surface. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[42]  E Ruoslahti,et al.  Crystal structure of the tenth type III cell adhesion module of human fibronectin. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  M. Uhlén,et al.  Binding proteins selected from combinatorial libraries of an α-helical bacterial receptor domain , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  A. Skerra,et al.  Small antibody-like proteins with prescribed ligand specificities derived from the lipocalin fold. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Shohei Koide,et al.  High-affinity single-domain binding proteins with a binary-code interface , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[47]  K. Wittrup,et al.  Shuffled antibody libraries created by in vivo homologous recombination and yeast surface display. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[48]  A. Kapila,et al.  Picomolar affinity fibronectin domains engineered utilizing loop length diversity, recursive mutagenesis, and loop shuffling. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[50]  S. Muyldermans,et al.  Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains , 1993, Nature.

[51]  Susan Jones,et al.  ProtorP: a protein-protein interaction analysis server , 2009, Bioinform..