QCS: A system for querying, clustering and summarizing documents

Information retrieval systems consist of many complicated components. Research and development of such systems is often hampered by the difficulty in evaluating how each particular component would behave across multiple systems. We present a novel integrated information retrieval system-the Query, Cluster, Summarize (QCS) system-which is portable, modular, and permits experimentation with different instantiations of each of the constituent text analysis components. Most importantly, the combination of the three types of methods in the QCS design improves retrievals by providing users more focused information organized by topic. We demonstrate the improved performance by a series of experiments using standard test sets from the Document Understanding Conferences (DUC) as measured by the best known automatic metric for summarization system evaluation, ROUGE. Although the DUC data and evaluations were originally designed to test multidocument summarization, we developed a framework to extend it to the task of evaluation for each of the three components: query, clustering, and summarization. Under this framework, we then demonstrate that the QCS system (end-to-end) achieves performance as good as or better than the best summarization engines. Given a query, QCS retrieves relevant documents, separates the retrieved documents into topic clusters, and creates a single summary for each cluster. In the current implementation, Latent Semantic Indexing is used for retrieval, generalized spherical k-means is used for the document clustering, and a method coupling sentence "trimming" and a hidden Markov model, followed by a pivoted QR decomposition, is used to create a single extract summary for each cluster. The user interface is designed to provide access to detailed information in a compact and useful format. Our system demonstrates the feasibility of assembling an effective IR system from existing software libraries, the usefulness of the modularity of the design, and the value of this particular combination of modules.

[1]  Manuel J. Maña López,et al.  Multidocument summarization: An added value to clustering in interactive retrieval , 2004, TOIS.

[2]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  Inderjit S. Dhillon,et al.  Efficient Clustering of Very Large Document Collections , 2001 .

[4]  Inderjit S. Dhillon,et al.  Iterative clustering of high dimensional text data augmented by local search , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2002. Proceedings..

[5]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[6]  Zhu Zhang,et al.  NewsInEssence: A System For Domain-Independent, Real-Time News Clustering and Multi-Document Summarization , 2001, HLT.

[7]  Inderjit S. Dhillon,et al.  Concept Decompositions for Large Sparse Text Data Using Clustering , 2004, Machine Learning.

[8]  Paul Over,et al.  Intrinsic Evaluation of Generic News Text Summarization Systems , 2003 .

[9]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  WebInEssence: A Personalized Web-Based Multi-Document Summarization and Recommendation System , 2008 .

[10]  Hoa Trang Dang,et al.  Overview of DUC 2005 , 2005 .

[11]  Andrei Mikheev,et al.  Tagging Sentence Boundaries , 2000, ANLP.

[12]  John M. Conroy Left-Brain/Right-Brain Multi-Document Summarization , 2004 .

[13]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer , 1989 .

[14]  L. Baum,et al.  A Maximization Technique Occurring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains , 1970 .

[15]  Ted Dunning,et al.  Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence , 1993, CL.

[16]  Chin-Yew Lin,et al.  ROUGE: A Package for Automatic Evaluation of Summaries , 2004, ACL 2004.

[17]  David Evans,et al.  Tracking and summarizing news on a daily basis with Columbia's Newsblaster , 2002 .

[18]  John M. Conroy,et al.  Performance of a Three-Stage System for Multi-Document Summarization , 2003 .

[19]  Eduard H. Hovy,et al.  The Automated Acquisition of Topic Signatures for Text Summarization , 2000, COLING.

[20]  Michael W. Berry,et al.  GTP (General Text Parser) Software for Text Mining , 2003 .

[21]  Sarah A. Goodman Performance of a Three-Stage System for Multi-Document Summarization , 2003 .

[22]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[23]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[24]  Dianne P. O'Leary,et al.  Text Summarization via Hidden Markov Models and Pivoted QR Matrix Decomposition , 2001 .

[25]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  A semidiscrete matrix decomposition for latent semantic indexing information retrieval , 1998, TOIS.