Integration of forest inventory and satellite imagery:: a Canadian status assessment and research issues

Abstract Canada's ability to sustainably manage approximately 10% of the global forest cover is a critical environmental and economic issue. The capacity to meet such demands and to deliver on national and international commitments regarding forest management is enabled through collaboration between federal, provincial, and territorial agencies. A principal collaborator is the National Forest Inventory (NFI); a systematic photo-plot based monitoring system designed specifically for reporting purposes and as an important input for scientific models. Satellite imagery is illustrated here as a support data set to ensure the quality of the NFI, for auditing the photo-plot contents, and to detect spatial biases. The Canadian Forest Service, in collaboration with the Canadian Space Agency and other federal and provincial agencies, is producing a national land cover database of the forested area of Canada (Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests (EOSD)) using Landsat-7 ETM+ data for circa 2000 conditions. The integration between the plot-based NFI with classified EOSD data is presented for central British Columbia, an area comprising 6 Landsat scenes and 324 2 km × 2 km photo-plots. Traditional accuracy assessment measures based on the analysis of coincidence matrices are reported as levels of agreement for hierarchically aggregated land cover categories (overall agreements of 91%, 79%, 64% and 26% for 3, 4, 6 and 20 classes respectively) to demonstrate coincidence between the different data products. Local agreement between NFI and EOSD is demonstrated as a means of photo-plot auditing while spatial biases are detected through investigations of geographic pattern in the coincidence values. The illustrated approaches may be expanded or applied to different mapped attributes (e.g., biomass) that are of utility to those attempting to characterize large areas in a consistent and rigorous fashion.

[1]  W. Kurz,et al.  National level forest monitoring and modeling in Canada , 2004 .

[2]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Statistical Rigor and Practical Utility in Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment , 2001 .

[3]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy , 1997 .

[4]  Limin Yang,et al.  Accuracy assessment for the U.S. Geological Survey Regional Land-Cover Mapping Program: New York and New Jersey Region , 2000 .

[5]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of association for cross classifications , 1979 .

[6]  D. Richard Cutler,et al.  Assessing map accuracy in a remotely sensed, ecoregion-scale cover map , 1998 .

[7]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Developments in Spatial Data Handling, 11th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Leicester, UK, August 23-25, 2004 , 2005, SDH.

[8]  C. Taillie,et al.  Modeling and interpreting the accuracy assessment error matrix for a doubly classified map , 2003, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[9]  Barry Boots,et al.  Toward Comparing Maps as Spatial Processes , 2004, SDH.

[10]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[11]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Estimating standard errors of accuracy assessment statistics under cluster sampling , 1997 .

[12]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Design and Analysis for Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment: Fundamental Principles , 1998 .

[13]  M. Gillis.  Canada's National Forest Inventory (Responding to Current Information Needs) , 2001, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[14]  A. Pekkarinen,et al.  Estimation of timber volume at the sample plot level by means of image segmentation and Landsat TM imagery , 2001 .

[15]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-sensed data , 1996 .

[16]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Use of auxiliary data to improve the precision of estimators of thematic map accuracy , 1996 .

[17]  C. Taillie,et al.  Multiscale advanced raster map analysis system: Definition, design and development , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[18]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets , 1994 .

[19]  Limin Yang,et al.  Thematic accuracy of MRLC land cover for the eastern United States , 2001 .

[20]  R. Leemans,et al.  Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic , 1992 .

[21]  M. Wulder,et al.  Spatially Partitioning Canada with the Landsat Worldwide Referencing System , 2001 .

[22]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Accuracy comparison of various remote sensing data sources in the retrieval of forest stand attributes , 2000 .

[23]  Gordon Cook,et al.  11. Applied Categorical Data Analysis , 1988 .

[24]  Jennifer A. Miller,et al.  Land-Cover Change Monitoring with Classification Trees Using Landsat TM and Ancillary Data , 2003 .

[25]  R. G. Pontlus.  Quantification Error Versus Location Error in Comparison of Categorical Maps , 2006 .

[26]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Introduction to special issue on map accuracy , 2003, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[27]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[28]  D. Meidinger,et al.  Ecosystems of British Columbia , 1991 .

[29]  Paul L. Patterson,et al.  Classification accuracy for stratification with remotely sensed data , 2003 .

[30]  Ronald J. Hall,et al.  Operational mapping of the land cover of the forested area of Canada with Landsat data: EOSD land cover program , 2003 .

[31]  M. Wulder,et al.  Landsat-7 ETM+ orthoimage coverage of Canada , 2002 .

[32]  Phaedon C. Kyriakidis,et al.  A geostatistical approach for mapping thematic classification accuracy and evaluating the impact of inaccurate spatial data on ecological model predictions , 2001, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[33]  D. H. Card.  Using known map category marginal frequencies to improve estimates of thematic map accuracy , 1982 .