Integrating major accidents hazard into occupational risk assessment: An index approach

Abstract Major Accident Hazard (MAH) and Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) are two separated topics in both industrial practice and legislation; recently, interest is increasing toward an integrated risk assessment mainly forced by the tendency to a more efficient safety management system. The present study proposes a semi-quantitative approach to integrate MAH in OSH risk assessment. The two risk types are characterized by opposite features: the OSH analysis is usually task-based and focused on job profiles, while the MAH analysis is space-based and focused on plant characteristics. The basic idea of the proposed approach is to merge spatial information and job profile features in order to improve OSH assessment; thus, a risk index derived by the recent standard ISO 12100 (2010) has been adapted. In detail, the proposed index combines exposure times of each worker at each plant unit – derived from the OSH analysis – with damage areas derived from MAH analysis allowing a quantitative assessment of the MAH risk level for each individual job profile. The model has been tested in a large petrochemical plant; several hypotheses have been developed in order to validate the model. Results have showed the potentiality of the proposed approach in providing a common and coherent representation of both MAH and OSH risks, according to job profiles and plant units.

[1]  Ulrich Hauptmanns,et al.  Management of health, safety and environment in process industry , 2008 .

[2]  Jhareswar Maiti.  Development of worksystem safety capability index (WSCI) , 2010 .

[3]  O. N. Aneziris,et al.  Assessment of occupational risks in an aluminium processing industry , 2010 .

[4]  Maria Grazia Gnoni,et al.  A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MODEL FOR CONTROLLING KNOCK-ON RISK INSIDE CHEMICAL PLANTS , 2012 .

[5]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Assessing Safety, Health, and Environmental Impact Early during Process Development , 2000 .

[6]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Process route index (PRI) to assess level of explosiveness for inherent safety quantification , 2009 .

[7]  Neil Mitchison,et al.  Safety management systems under Seveso II : Implementation and assessment , 1999 .

[8]  G. A. Papadakis,et al.  The exposure–damage approach in the quantification of occupational risk in workplaces involving dangerous substances , 2008 .

[9]  Mimi Haryani Hassim,et al.  Development of a Methodology for Assessing Inherent Occupational Health Hazards , 2006 .

[10]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Quantifying Occupational Risk: The Development of an Occupational Risk Model , 2008 .

[11]  Mimi Haryani Hassim,et al.  Inherent occupational health assessment during process research and development stage , 2010 .

[12]  Jason Michael Woodruff,et al.  Consequence and likelihood in risk estimation: A matter of balance in UK health and safety risk assessment practice , 2005 .

[13]  J. P. Gupta,et al.  Calculation of Fire and Explosion Index (F&EI) value for the Dow Guide taking credit for the loss control measures , 2003 .

[14]  Jenq-Renn Chen,et al.  A predictive risk index for safety performance in process industries , 2004 .

[15]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 1 - guideword applicability and method description. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 2-Domino Hazard Index and case study. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[17]  Pjm Peter Sonnemans,et al.  Accidents: A discrepancy between indicators and facts! , 2008 .