CFD simulation and PIV measurement of the flow field generated by modified pitched blade turbine impellers

Abstract The hydrodynamics generated by modified pitched blade turbine (m-PBT) impellers with down-pumping mode were systematically investigated through particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements and computational fluid dynamics simulations. The simulated mean axial velocity, mean radial velocity, and turbulent kinetic energy by the standard k–ɛ turbulent model were validated against the measured PIV data. This shows that the standard k–ɛ turbulent model predicts mean velocity well, but underestimates turbulent kinetic energy near the blade. The flow field and power consumption as well as pumping number for the m-PBT and the standard PBT impeller were predicted. The simulation results demonstrate that a few simple changes of the blade shape influence the velocity distribution, i.e., increasing the magnitude of mean velocity in the vicinity of impeller, and that the m-PBT impeller has a higher pumping efficiency than the standard one.

[1]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  Effect of impeller design on the flow pattern and mixing in stirred tanks , 2006 .

[2]  D. Fletcher,et al.  An assessment of different turbulence models for predicting flow in a baffled tank stirred with a Rushton turbine , 2011 .

[3]  Chris D. Rielly,et al.  Angle-resolved stereo-PIV measurements close to a down-pumping pitched-blade turbine , 2006 .

[4]  A. Nienow.  Hydrodynamics of Stirred Bioreactors , 1998 .

[5]  Palani Sivashanmugam,et al.  Experimental and CFD simulation studies on power consumption in mixing using energy saving turbine agitator , 2010 .

[6]  Binxin Wu,et al.  Large eddy simulation of mechanical mixing in anaerobic digesters , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  Relation between flow pattern and blending in stirred tanks , 1999 .

[8]  Philippe A. Tanguy,et al.  CFD analysis of several design parameters affecting the performance of the Maxblend impeller , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[9]  Ivan Fořt,et al.  On hydraulic efficiency of pitched blade impellers , 2011 .

[10]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  CFD modelling and mixing in stirred tanks , 1999 .

[11]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  Use of angle resolved PIV to estimate local specific energy dissipation rates for up- and down-pumping pitched blade agitators in a stirred tank , 2009 .

[12]  Chinmay V. Rane,et al.  CFD simulation of stirred tanks: Comparison of turbulence models. Part I: Radial flow impellers , 2011 .

[13]  Zhengming Gao,et al.  Investigation of Fluid Flow in a Dual Rushton Impeller Stirred Tank Using Particle Image Velocimetry , 2008 .

[14]  J. Morchain,et al.  LES and URANS simulations of hydrodynamics in mixing tank: Comparison to PIV experiments , 2008 .

[15]  Alain Liné,et al.  Experimental analysis of hydrodynamics in a radially agitated tank , 2002 .

[16]  Jyeshtharaj B. Joshi,et al.  Assessment of standard k–ε, RSM and LES turbulence models in a baffled stirred vessel agitated by various impeller designs , 2008 .

[17]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  Comparison of axial flow impellers using a laser doppler anemometer , 1992 .

[18]  Zhengming Gao,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry Experiments and Large Eddy Simulations of Merging Flow Characteristics in Dual Rushton Turbine Stirred Tanks , 2012 .

[19]  Ivan Fo.  On hydraulic efficiency of pitched blade impellers , 2011 .

[20]  Catherine Xuereb,et al.  Gas−Liquid Flow Generated by a Pitched-Blade Turbine: Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements and Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations , 2003 .

[21]  P. Mavros,et al.  FLOW VISUALIZATION IN STIRRED VESSELS A Review of Experimental Techniques , 2001 .

[22]  Zhengming Gao,et al.  PIV experiments and large eddy simulations of single-loop flow fields in Rushton turbine stirred tanks , 2011 .

[23]  Michael Yianneskis,et al.  Turbulence properties of the impeller stream of a Rushton turbine , 1998 .

[24]  J. Derksen,et al.  Assessment of large eddy and RANS stirred tank simulations by means of LDA , 2004 .