HOMOR: Higher Order Model Outlier Rejection for high b-value MR diffusion data

Diffusion MR images are prone to artefacts caused by head movement and cardiac pulsation. Previous techniques for the automated voxel-wise detection of signal intensity outliers have relied on the fit of the diffusion tensor to the data (RESTORE). However, the diffusion tensor cannot appropriately model more than a single fibre population, which may lead to inaccuracies when identifying outlier voxels in crossing fibre regions, particularly when high b-values are used to obtain increased angular contrast. HOMOR (higher order model outlier rejection) was developed to overcome this limitation and is introduced in this study. HOMOR is closely related to RESTORE, but employs a higher order model capable of resolving multiple fibre populations within a voxel. Using high b-value (b=3000 s/mm2) diffusion data from a population of 90 healthy participants, as well as simulations, HOMOR was found to identify a decreased number of outlier voxels compared to RESTORE primarily within areas of crossing, bending and fanning fibres. At lower b-values, however, RESTORE and HOMOR give similar results, which is demonstrated using diffusion data acquired at b=1000 s/mm2 in a mixed cohort. This study demonstrates that, although RESTORE is suitable for low b-value data, HOMOR is better suited for high b-value data.

[1]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Apparent Fibre Density: A novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Ragini Verma,et al.  Effects of physiological noise in population analysis of diffusion tensor MRI data , 2011, NeuroImage.

[5]  Yu Bai,et al.  Model-based registration to correct for motion between acquisitions in diffusion MR imaging , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[6]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Correction of spatial distortion in EPI due to inhomogeneous static magnetic fields using the reversed gradient method , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  P. Basser,et al.  Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion‐weighted MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Stefan Skare,et al.  How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  Revital Nossin-Manor,et al.  Preterm neonatal diffusion processing using detection and replacement of outliers prior to resampling , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  Dongrong Xu,et al.  Automated artifact detection and removal for improved tensor estimation in motion-corrupted DTI data sets using the combination of local binary patterns and 2D partial least squares. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  Maxime Descoteaux,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of 10 tractography algorithms on a realistic diffusion MR phantom , 2011, NeuroImage.

[13]  Alan Connelly,et al.  MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions , 2012, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[14]  Stephen E. Rose,et al.  Assessment of cortico-cortical connectivity in the presence of image artifact , 2011 .

[15]  P. Basser,et al.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[16]  M. Horsfield,et al.  Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  S. Arridge,et al.  Detection and modeling of non‐Gaussian apparent diffusion coefficient profiles in human brain data , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Yu-Chien Wu,et al.  Comparison of diffusion tensor imaging measurements at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T with and without parallel imaging. , 2006, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[19]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[20]  Carlo Pierpaoli,et al.  Informed RESTORE: A method for robust estimation of diffusion tensor from low redundancy datasets in the presence of physiological noise artifacts , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  Alexander Leemans,et al.  The B‐matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  RESTORE: Robust estimation of tensors by outlier rejection , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  A. Connelly,et al.  Reorientation of fiber orientation distributions using apodized point spread functions , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Tractography: Where Do We Go from Here? , 2011, Brain Connect..