This paper discusses results of a two-year collaborative research project between the authors and the Demand Response Research Center focused on behavioral response to a voluntary time-of-use pilot rate offered by the Sacramento Municipal Utilities District (SMUD) under the PowerChoice label. The project had two purposes: one was to assess the potential for increasing demand response through the introduction of enhanced information and real-time consumption feedback; the second was to better understand behavioral response to a TOU rate. Three successive waves of telephone surveys collected details about reasons for participation, actions taken, capacities and constraints to altering behavior, and a range of salient conditions, such as demographics and dwelling characteristics. Pre- and post-program interval meter data for participants and a comparison sample of households were also collected and analyzed to consider initial and season-change price effects of the rate and the effect of supplemental information treatments on response. Over half of surveyed participating households reported that they had made a great deal of effort to adjust their electricity consumption to the rate. Despite this, load data analysis revealed only minimal price effects; and, though households subjected to information treatments seemed to have learned from these treatments, load data analysis againmore » detected only minimal effects on load. Given the currently high hopes for behavioral intervention and residential TOU rates, these unexpected results require explanation. We suggest a number of possibilities and discuss some implications for TOU programs, and for understanding demand response behavior and approaches to experiments with TOU rates.« less
[1]
William J. Hausman,et al.
Time-of-Day Pricing in the U.S. Electric Power Industry at the Turn of the Century
,
1984
.
[2]
D. Aigner,et al.
The Residential Electricity Time-of-Use Pricing Experiments: What Have We Learned?
,
1985
.
[3]
Catherine L. Kling,et al.
Conservation and Welfare Effects of Information in a Time-Of-Day Pricing Experiment (The)
,
1989
.
[4]
D. McKenzie‐Mohr,et al.
Promoting Sustainable Behavior : An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing
,
2000
.
[5]
Kathryn B. Janda,et al.
Understanding the response of commercial and institutional organizations to the California energy crisis. A report to the California Energy Commission - Sylvia Bender, Project Manager
,
2002
.
[6]
Sarah C. Darby,et al.
New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information and Voluntary Measures
,
2003
.
[7]
Ahmad Faruqui,et al.
Demand Response and Advanced Metering
,
2006
.
[8]
A. Carlsson-kanyama,et al.
Energy efficiency in residences - Challenges for women and men in the North
,
2007
.
[9]
Barbara R. Alexander.
SMART METERS, REAL TIME PRICING, AND DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR LOW INCOME ELECTRIC CUSTOMERS
,
2007
.
[10]
S. Owens,et al.
How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy
,
2008
.
[11]
Jane S. Peters,et al.
PowerChoice Residential Customer Response to TOU Rates
,
2010
.