Evaluation of Quality Attribute Variability in Software Product Families

Software product family or line is a software engineering paradigm that systematizes reuse. In software product line engineering, two phases are distinguished: domain engineering which is in charge of developing a common infrastructure and assets and application engineering which makes use of those assets to generate the products. One of the key aspects of product lines is variability and its management. However, the main focus has been on functional variability and quality variability in software product lines has not received so much attention by researchers. In a product line different members of the line may require different levels of a quality requirement, for instance they could differ in terms of their availability, security, reliability, etc. Due to this variability, quality evaluation in software product lines is much more complicated that in single-systems. One alternative is to evaluate all the products of a line but it is very expensive and ways of reducing evaluation efforts are necessary. In this direction, the paper presents a method for facilitating cost-effective quality evaluation of a product line taking into consideration variability on quality attributes.

[1]  Antonio Ruiz Cortés,et al.  Automated Reasoning on Feature Models , 2005, CAiSE.

[2]  Arie van Deursen,et al.  Evaluating an embedded software reference architecture - industrial experience report , 2005, Ninth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering.

[3]  Goiuria Sagardui,et al.  Product-line architecture: new issues for evaluation , 2005 .

[4]  Don S. Batory,et al.  Feature Models, Grammars, and Propositional Formulas , 2005, SPLC.

[5]  Jan Bosch,et al.  Architecture-level modifiability analysis (ALMA) , 2004, J. Syst. Softw..

[6]  Connie U. Smith,et al.  New Book - Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software , 2001, Int. CMG Conference.

[7]  Marco Sinnema,et al.  COVAMOF: A Framework for Modeling Variability in Software Product Families , 2004, SPLC.

[8]  Peter Heidl,et al.  Reviewing Product Line Architectures: Experience Report of ATAM in an Automotive Context , 2001, PFE.

[9]  G. Turnbull.  Industrial Experience Report , 1999, EUROMICRO.

[10]  Bo Yang,et al.  Addressing quality attributes in domain analysis for product lines , 2006, IEE Proc. Softw..

[11]  Tomi Männistö,et al.  Quality Attribute Variability within a Software Product Family Architecture , 2006 .

[12]  Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite,et al.  On Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering , 2009, Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications.

[13]  Connie U. Smith,et al.  PASASM: a method for the performance assessment of software architectures , 2002, WOSP '02.

[14]  Felix Bachmann,et al.  SACAM: The Software Architecture Comparison Analysis Method , 2003 .

[15]  Krzysztof Czarnecki,et al.  Formalizing cardinality-based feature models and their specialization , 2005, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[16]  Brian P. Gallagher,et al.  Using the Architecture Tradeoff Analysis Method SM to Evaluate a Reference Architecture: A Case Study , 2000 .

[17]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Communicating the variability of a software-product family to customers , 2004, Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung.

[18]  Robyn R. Lutz,et al.  An approach to architectural analysis of product lines , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium.

[19]  Jan Bosch,et al.  Scenario-based software architecture reengineering , 1998, Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse (Cat. No.98TB100203).

[20]  Vojislav B. Misic,et al.  Extending the ATAM Architecture Evaluation to Product Line Architectures , 2005, 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'05).

[21]  Jan Bosch,et al.  Scenario-based Assessment of Software Architecture Usability , 2003, ICSE Workshop on SE-HCI.

[22]  Tommi Mikkonen,et al.  Assessing systems adaptability to a product family , 2004, J. Syst. Archit..

[23]  Marco Sinnema,et al.  COSVAM: a technique for assessing software variability in software product families , 2004, 20th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2004. Proceedings..

[24]  Krzysztof Czarnecki,et al.  Generative programming - methods, tools and applications , 2000 .

[25]  Alessandro Maccari.  Experiences in assessing product family software architecture for evolution , 2002, ICSE '02.

[26]  Rick Kazman,et al.  Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies , 2001 .

[27]  Jaejoon Lee,et al.  FORM: A feature-;oriented reuse method with domain-;specific reference architectures , 1998, Ann. Softw. Eng..

[28]  Stefan Kowalewski,et al.  Reliability-Oriented Product Line Engineering of Embedded Systems , 2001, PFE.

[29]  Jan Bosch,et al.  Architecture level prediction of software maintenance , 1999, Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (Cat. No. PR00090).

[30]  Kyo Chul Kang,et al.  Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study , 1990 .

[31]  Paul Clements,et al.  Software product lines - practices and patterns , 2001, SEI series in software engineering.

[32]  Stan Jarzabek,et al.  Quality Prediction and Assessment for Product Lines , 2003, CAiSE.

[33]  Martin L. Griss,et al.  Integrating feature modeling with the RSEB , 1998, Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse (Cat. No.98TB100203).

[34]  Claudio Riva,et al.  Experiences with software product family evolution , 2003, Sixth International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, 2003. Proceedings..

[35]  Eila Niemelä,et al.  Quality-driven architecture design and quality analysis method: A revolutionary initiation approach to a product line architecture , 2002 .

[36]  Jan Gerben Wijnstra.  Evolving a Product Family in a Changing Context , 2003, PFE.