Product Quality and New Product Performance: The Role of Network Externalities and Switching Costs*

Research about the critical drivers of new product success is perhaps one of the thorniest issues confronting academic research in the field. Among them, product quality is considered a crucial element to obtain a competitive advantage. However, empirical evidence suggests low returns on product quality investments in new products, and consequent manager claims for an explanation of whether quality investments are fruitful for the firm. Recently, a new research stream has suggested that the role of other complementary products (indirect network externalities) and the critical mass of adopters (direct network externalities) lead to higher market returns than quality itself. Moreover, researchers disagree about the perverse or positive effects that the switching costs associated with the product have on the short- and long-term performance of the firm. In this paper, we propose that, as products and technologies become more interconnected, the associated network effects and switching costs will play an important role with regard to new product performance, both independently and in conjunction with its quality. We empirically test a model that relates product quality, network effects, and switching costs to short-term/long-term new product performance, using data collected from 255 innovative products. The data analysis indicates that network effects, and consumers' switching costs, can modify previous findings with regard to the isolated product quality consequences concerning new product performance. Overall, the results of this study may help firms manage the relationship between quality, network externalities, and switching costs more efficiently, both in the short term and in the long term.

[1]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[2]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Dynamic Competition with Switching Costs , 1988 .

[3]  R. Calantone,et al.  The Critical Role of Product Quality in the International Performance of Industrial Firms , 2000 .

[4]  Arvind Sahay,et al.  The Role of Resource Access, Market Considerations, and the Nature of Innovation in Pursuit of Standards in the New Product Development Process , 2003 .

[5]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Price Competition and Compatibility in the Presence of Positive Demand Externalities , 1995 .

[6]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[7]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Product Introduction with Network Externalities , 1992 .

[8]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Exploring Mediating and Moderating Influences on the Links between Cycle Time, Proficiency in Entry Timing and New Product Profitability , 2008 .

[9]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[10]  Michael Song,et al.  Marketing and technology resource complementarity : An analysis of their Interaction Effect in two environmental contexts , 2005 .

[11]  Amiya K. Basu,et al.  Indirect Network Externality Effects on Product Attributes , 2003 .

[12]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  Product Complements and Substitutes in the Real World: The Relevance of “Other Products” , 2004 .

[13]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[14]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  Getting Return on Quality: Revenue Expansion, Cost Reduction, or Both? , 2002 .

[15]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[16]  V. Pucik,et al.  Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value , 2005 .

[17]  V. Zeithaml Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[18]  Willow A. Sheremata Competing Through Innovation in Network Markets: Strategies for Challengers , 2004 .

[19]  S. Stremersch,et al.  Indirect Network Effects in New Product Growth , 2007 .

[20]  S. Vickery,et al.  An empirical analysis of the competitive dimensions of quality performance in the automotive supply industry , 2000 .

[21]  G. Soutar,et al.  Measuring new product success: an empirical investigation of Australian SMEs , 2004 .

[22]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[23]  Mariëlle E. H. Creusen,et al.  The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[24]  H. Bansal,et al.  “Migrating” to new service providers: Toward a unifying framework of consumers’ switching behaviors , 2005 .

[25]  D. Jain,et al.  Modeling the Evolution of Markets with Indirect Network Externalities: An Application to Digital Television , 1999 .

[26]  R. Jacobson,et al.  Market Share and Customers’ Perceptions of Quality: When Can Firms Grow Their Way to Higher versus Lower Quality? , 1999 .

[27]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  Network externality : an uncommon tragedy , 1994 .

[28]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[29]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Home Video Game Industry , 2002 .

[30]  P. N. Golder,et al.  How Does Objective Quality Affect Perceived Quality? Short-Term Effects, Long-Term Effects, and Asymmetries , 2006 .

[31]  Ambar G. Rao,et al.  Too Little, Too Early: Introduction Timing and New Product Performance in the Personal Digital Assistant Industry , 1997 .

[32]  H. Varian,et al.  The Art of Standards Wars , 1999 .

[33]  R. Rust,et al.  Why Improving Quality Doesn't Improve Quality (or Whatever Happened to Marketing?) , 1993 .

[34]  P. Larson,et al.  Total cost/response rate trade-offs in mail survey research: impact of follow-up mailings and monetary incentives , 2003 .

[35]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables , 2000 .

[36]  G. Tellis,et al.  Why and How Quality Wins over Network Effects and What it Means , 2008 .

[37]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes , 2002 .

[38]  Yikuan Lee,et al.  New product launch strategy for network effects products , 2003 .

[39]  Everett E. Adam,et al.  Quality improvement approach and performance: multisite analysis within a firm , 2000 .

[40]  Value pricing in presence of network effects , 2002 .

[41]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  The Contingent Value of Responsive and Proactive Market Orientations for New Product Program Performance , 2005 .

[42]  G. Tellis,et al.  The Value of Quality: Stock Market Returns to Published Quality Reviews , 2007 .

[43]  Yikuan Lee,et al.  The Impact of Communication Strategy on Launching New Products: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness , 2003 .

[44]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Indirect Network Effects in the Market for Personal Digital Assistants , 2004 .

[45]  J. Pae,et al.  The impact of technology advancement strategies on consumers' patronage decisions , 2002 .

[46]  D. Garvin Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality , 1987 .

[47]  Judy K. Frels,et al.  Consumer switching costs: A typology, antecedents, and consequences , 2003 .

[48]  N. Economides The Economics of Networks , 1995 .

[49]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  New Product Preannouncing Behavior: A Market Signaling Study , 1988 .

[50]  M. Shurmer An investigation into sources of network externalities in the packaged PC software market , 1993 .

[51]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[52]  F. Dwyer,et al.  An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes , 2000 .

[53]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  R. Teas,et al.  The effects of extrinsic product cues on consumers’ perceptions of quality, sacrifice, and value , 2000 .

[55]  Raji Srinivasan,et al.  Sources, characteristics and effects of emerging technologies: Research opportunities in innovation , 2008 .

[56]  Chiranjeev Kohli,et al.  Signaling New Product Introductions: A Framework Explaining the Timing of Preannouncements , 1999 .

[57]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Commentaries and Rejoinder to “Does Quality Win? Network Effects versus Quality in High-Tech Markets” , 2009 .

[58]  S. Bell,et al.  Customer relationship dynamics: Service quality and customer loyalty in the context of varying levels of customer expertise and switching costs , 2005 .

[59]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  First in, First out? The Effects of Network Externalities on Pioneer Survival , 2004 .

[60]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  Vendor Consideration and Switching Behavior for Buyers in High-Technology Markets , 1995 .

[61]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[62]  G. Tellis,et al.  Does Quality Win? Network Effects versus Quality in High-Tech Markets , 2009 .