Positive Emotions, More Than Anxiety or Other Negative Emotions, Predict Willingness to Interact With Robots

Like early work on human intergroup interaction, previous research on people’s willingness to interact with robots has focused mainly on effects of anxiety. However, existing findings suggest that other negative emotions as well as some positive emotions also have effects. This article systematically examines the roles of positive and negative emotions in predicting willingness to interact with robots, using an integrative analysis of data across five studies that use diverse interaction conditions and several types of robots. We hypothesize and find that positive emotions account for more variance than negative emotions. Practically, the findings suggest new strategies for interventions, aimed at increasing positive emotions to increase willingness to engage in intergroup interaction. No existing work has examined whether positive emotions are stronger predictors than negative emotions for willingness for human intergroup interaction, an important topic for future research.

[1]  P. Rochat,et al.  The Uncanny Valley: Existence and Explanations , 2015 .

[2]  E. Broadbent Interactions With Robots: The Truths We Reveal About Ourselves , 2017, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  T. Partonen,et al.  Comparison of verbal and emotional responses of elderly people with mild/moderate dementia and those with severe dementia in responses to seal robot, PARO , 2014 .

[4]  E. Halperin Emotion, Emotion Regulation, and Conflict Resolution , 2014 .

[5]  E. Plant Responses to Interracial Interactions Over Time , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration , 2018, Social and Personality Psychology Compass.

[8]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Rabble of Robots Effects: Number and Type of Robots Modulates Attitudes, Emotions, and Stereotypes , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Intergroup Emotions Theory: Production, Regulation, and Modification of Group-Based Emotions , 2018 .

[10]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[11]  Ken Kelley,et al.  Fixed effects models versus mixed effects models for clustered data: Reviewing the approaches, disentangling the differences, and making recommendations. , 2019, Psychological methods.

[12]  Jonah Gabry,et al.  User-friendly Bayesian regression modeling: A tutorial with rstanarm and shinystan , 2018 .

[13]  Jens F. Binder,et al.  Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  The Uncanny Valley [From the Field] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[15]  K. Karasawa,et al.  Determinants of the intention to participate in the judicial system in undergraduates: Using the factor relation model , 2018 .

[16]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  When Groups Meet: The Dynamics of Intergroup Contact , 2011 .

[17]  Gordon Hodson,et al.  Intergroup Contact as an Agent of Cognitive Liberalization , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[18]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  “I Love This Dog”—Children’s Emotional Attachment to the Robotic Dog AIBO , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[19]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Threatening Flocks and Mindful Snowflakes: How Group Entitativity Affects Perceptions of Robots , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[21]  L. Gaertner,et al.  In Harm’s Way: On Preferential Response to Threatening Stimuli , 2017, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  Andrea M Hussong,et al.  Integrative data analysis: the simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[23]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Experiments with More Than One Random Factor: Designs, Analytic Models, and Statistical Power , 2017, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  T. Pettigrew Intergroup contact theory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Human emotion and the uncanny valley: A GLM, MDS, and Isomap analysis of robot video ratings , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  Joseph E LeDoux Rethinking the Emotional Brain , 2012, Neuron.

[27]  J. Dovidio,et al.  The Role of Emotions in Determining Willingness to Engage in Intergroup Contact , 2002 .

[28]  F. Eyssel,et al.  Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. , 2012, The British journal of social psychology.

[29]  D. Butz,et al.  Interethnic Interactions: Expectancies, Emotions, and Behavioral Intentions , 2008 .

[30]  A. Aron,et al.  Shared Activities and Marital Satisfaction: Causal Direction and Self-Expansion versus Boredom , 1993 .

[31]  K. Burns,et al.  Suppressing Emotions Toward Stereotyped Targets: The Impact on Willingness to Engage in Contact , 2008 .

[32]  F. Eyssel,et al.  (S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots1 , 2012 .

[33]  C. Weaver Social Distance as a Measure of Prejudice Among Ethnic Groups in the United States , 2008 .

[34]  Dylan F. Glas,et al.  Persistence of the uncanny valley: the influence of repeated interactions and a robot's attitude on its perception , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[35]  E. Halperin,et al.  Can Emotion Regulation Change Political Attitudes in Intractable Conflicts? From the Laboratory to the Field , 2013, Psychological science.

[36]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[37]  C.D. Martin,et al.  The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places [Book Review] , 1997, IEEE Spectrum.

[38]  E. Halperin,et al.  Indirect emotion regulation in intractable conflicts: A new approach to conflict resolution , 2014 .

[39]  Markus Brauer,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models and the Analysis of Nonindependent Data: A Unified Framework to Analyze Categorical and Continuous Independent Variables that Vary Within-Subjects and/or Within-Items , 2017, Psychological methods.

[40]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Specific emotions as mediators of the effect of intergroup contact on prejudice: findings across multiple participant and target groups , 2017, Cognition & emotion.

[41]  C. Sibley,et al.  Why Do We Hold Mixed Emotions About Racial Out-Groups? A Case for Affect Matching , 2019, Psychological science.

[42]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Comparison of Verbal and Emotional Responses of Elderly People with Mild/Moderate Dementia and Those with Severe Dementia in Responses to Seal Robot, PARO , 2014, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[43]  A. Aron,et al.  Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. , 1997 .

[44]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Effects of Intergroup Contact and Political Predispositions on Prejudice: Role of Intergroup Emotions , 2004 .

[45]  S. Mineka,et al.  Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. , 2001, Psychological review.

[46]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[47]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[48]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication. , 2019, Psychological methods.

[49]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[50]  Steven O. Entezari,et al.  Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley , 2015 .

[51]  A. Greenwald,et al.  With malice toward none and charity for some: ingroup favoritism enables discrimination. , 2014, The American psychologist.

[52]  Michael Betancourt,et al.  A Conceptual Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo , 2017, 1701.02434.

[53]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Different Emotional Reactions to Different Groups : A Sociofunctional Threat-Based Approach to “ Prejudice ” , 2005 .

[54]  W. Stephan Intergroup Anxiety , 2014, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.