The Social Entropy Process: Axiomatising theAggregation of Probabilistic Beliefs

The present work stems from a desire to combine ideas arising from two historically different schemes of probabilistic reasoning, each having its own axiomatic traditions, into a single broader axiomatic framework, capable of providing general new insights into the nature of probabilistic inference in a multiagent context. In the present sketch of our work we first describe briefly the background context, and we then present a set of natural principles to be satisfied by any general method of aggregating the partially defined probabilistic beliefs of several agents into a single probabilistic belief function. We will call such a general method of aggregation a social inference process. Finally we define a particular social inference process, the Social Entropy Process (abbreviated to SEP), which satisfies the principles formulated earlier. SEP has a natural justification in terms of information theory, and is closely related to the maximum entropy inference process: indeed it can be regarded as a natural extension of that inference process to the multiagent context.

[1]  Jeff B. Paris,et al.  A note on the inevitability of maximum entropy , 1990, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[2]  M. Schervish,et al.  Characterization of Externally Bayesian Pooling Operators , 1986 .

[3]  Jeff B. Paris,et al.  In defense of the maximum entropy inference process , 1997, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[4]  A. Diederich,et al.  Evaluating and Combining Subjective Probability Estimates , 1997 .

[5]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Maximum Entropy Aggregation of Expert Predictions , 1996 .

[6]  Rodney W. Johnson,et al.  Axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum entropy and the principle of minimum cross-entropy , 1980, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Carl G. Wagner Aggregating subjective probabilities: some limitative theorems , 1984, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[8]  J. Paris The Uncertain Reasoner's Companion: A Mathematical Perspective , 1994 .

[9]  R. Cooke Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science , 1991 .

[10]  C. Genest,et al.  Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis , 1987 .

[11]  T. S. Jayram,et al.  Generalized Opinion Pooling , 2004, ISAIM.

[12]  William B. Levy,et al.  Maximum entropy aggregation of individual opinions , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  Peter Hawes,et al.  Investigation of Properties of Some Inference Processes , 2007 .

[14]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Graphical Models for Groups: Belief Aggregation and Risk Sharing , 2005, Decis. Anal..

[15]  Jeff B. Paris Common Sense and Maximum Entropy , 2004, Synthese.

[16]  Christian Genest,et al.  Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography , 1986 .

[17]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Aggregating disparate estimates of chance , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  C. Genest A Conflict between Two Axioms for Combining Subjective Distributions , 1984 .