Investigating the role of educational robotics in formal mathematics education: the case of geometry for 15-year-old students

Research has shown that Educational Robotics (ER) enhances student performance, interest, engagement and collaboration. However, until now, the adoption of robotics in formal education has remained relatively scarce. Among other causes, this is due to the difficulty of determining the alignment of educational robotic learning activities with the learning outcomes envisioned by the curriculum, as well as their integration with traditional, non-robotics learning activities that are well established in teachers’ practices. This work investigates the integration of ER into formal mathematics education, through a quasi-experimental study employing the Thymio robot and Scratch programming to teach geometry to two classes of 15-year-old students, for a total of 26 participants. Three research questions were addressed: (1) Should an ER-based theoretical lecture precede, succeed or replace a traditional theoretical lecture? (2) What is the students’ perception of and engagement in the ER-based lecture and exercises? (3) Do the findings differ according to students’ prior appreciation of mathematics? The results suggest that ER activities are as valid as traditional ones in helping students grasp the relevant theoretical concepts. Robotics activities seem particularly beneficial during exercise sessions: students freely chose to do exercises that included the robot, rated them as significantly more interesting and useful than their traditional counterparts, and expressed their interest in introducing ER in other mathematics lectures. Finally, results were generally consistent between the students that like and did not like mathematics, suggesting the use of robotics as a means to broaden the number of students engaged in the discipline.

[1]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Bringing Robotics to Formal Education: The Thymio Open-Source Hardware Robot , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[2]  Sung Eun Jung,et al.  Systematic Review of Research Trends in Robotics Education for Young Children , 2018 .

[3]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation , 1995 .

[4]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[5]  Dimitris Alimisis,et al.  Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges , 2013 .

[6]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  A review: Can robots reshape K-12 STEM education? , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[7]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Feedback in Computer-Based Instruction , 1995 .

[8]  Hee-jeong Kim Concreteness Fading Strategy: A Promising and Sustainable Instructional Model in Mathematics Classrooms , 2020, Sustainability.

[9]  M. Heidmets,et al.  The Impact of Educational Robots as Learning Tools on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Basic Education , 2019, Digital Turn in Schools—Research, Policy, Practice.

[10]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Designing Technology Activities that Teach Mathematics , 2010 .

[11]  Sue Fitzgerald,et al.  Pair programming in education: a literature review , 2011, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[12]  Amy Eguchi,et al.  Educational Robotics Theories and Practice: Tips for how to do it Right , 2012 .

[13]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: a model for creative computational problem solving , 2020, International Journal of STEM Education.

[14]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  What Teachers Need for Orchestrating Robotic Classrooms , 2020, EC-TEL.

[15]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Pedagogical Uses of Thymio II: How Do Teachers Perceive Educational Robots in Formal Education? , 2016, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[16]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  A computer science and robotics integration model for primary school: evaluation of a large-scale in-service K-4 teacher-training program , 2021, Educ. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Merredith Portsmore,et al.  Bringing Engineering to Elementary School , 2004 .

[18]  David P. Miller,et al.  Robotics for Education , 2016, Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2nd Ed..

[19]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[20]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[21]  Paola Ferrarelli,et al.  Methodology and Results on Teaching Maths Using Mobile Robots , 2017, ROBOT.

[22]  Klaus-Tycho Foerster Integrating Programming into the Mathematics Curriculum: Combining Scratch and Geometry in Grades 6 and 7 , 2016, SIGITE.

[23]  Newton Spolaôr,et al.  How Have Robots Supported STEM Teaching , 2017 .

[24]  Baichang Zhong,et al.  A Systematic Review on Exploring the Potential of Educational Robotics in Mathematics Education , 2018, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

[25]  O. Iskrenovic-Momcilovic Improving Geometry Teaching with Scratch , 2020 .

[26]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Teaching Partnerships: Early Childhood and Engineering Students Teaching Math and Science Through Robotics , 2005 .

[27]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  The symbiotic relationship between educational robotics and computer science in formal education , 2021, Educ. Inf. Technol..

[28]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..