Reconsideration of the simulated work task situation: a context instrument for evaluation of information retrieval interaction
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Orland Hoeber. ExploringWeb Search Results by Visually Specifying Utility Functions , 2007 .
[2] Preben Hansen,et al. SICS at iCLEF 2002: Cross-Language Relevance Assessment and Task Context , 2002, CLEF.
[3] Peter Ingwersen,et al. The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 1997, J. Documentation.
[4] Elaine Toms,et al. Enterprise search behaviour of software engineers , 2006, SIGIR.
[5] Daniela Petrelli,et al. On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..
[6] Kalervo Järvelin,et al. An analysis of two approaches in information retrieval: From frameworks to study designs , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[7] Preben Hansen,et al. Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies: Book Reviews , 2005 .
[8] Jenny Craven,et al. A task-based approach to assessing the accessibility of web sites , 2007 .
[9] Raya Fidel,et al. Ranking expansion terms using partial and ostensive evidence , 2002 .
[10] Robert Villa,et al. FacetBrowser: a user interface for complex search tasks , 2008, ACM Multimedia.
[11] Daniela Petrelli,et al. An examination of automatic video retrieval technology on access to the contents of an historical video archive , 2008, Program.
[12] Jenny Craven. Access to electronic resources by visually impaired people , 2003, Inf. Res..
[13] Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes,et al. System Description: An Orienteering Strategy to Browse Semantically-Enhanced Educational Wiki Pages , 2007, ESWC.
[14] C. Benito. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) , 2003 .
[15] Ian Ruthven,et al. Searcher's Assessments of Task Complexity for Web Searching , 2004, ECIR.
[16] Mounia Lalmas,et al. Investigating the use of summarisation for interactive XML retrieval , 2006, SAC.
[17] Jaana Kekäläinen,et al. Binary and graded relevance in IR evaluations--Comparison of the effects on ranking of IR systems , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..
[18] Ryen W. White,et al. Using top-ranking sentences to facilitate effective information access: Book Reviews , 2005 .
[19] Ivan Koychev,et al. Query-Based Document Skimming: A User-Centred Evaluation of Relevance Profiling , 2003, ECIR.
[20] Birger Larsen,et al. Report on the INEX 2005 interactive track , 2007, SIGF.
[21] Joemon M. Jose,et al. Spatial querying for image retrieval: a user-oriented evaluation , 1998, SIGIR '98.
[22] Lois M. L. Delcambre,et al. Semantic components enhance retrieval of domain-specific documents , 2007, CIKM '07.
[23] Joemon M. Jose,et al. Searchers' criteria For assessing web pages , 2003, SIGIR '03.
[24] Amanda Spink,et al. Cognitive shifts related to interactive information retrieval , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..
[25] Joemon M. Jose,et al. Effectiveness of additional representations for the search result presentation on the web , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..
[26] Kerry Rodden,et al. Does organisation by similarity assist image browsing? , 2001, CHI.
[27] Ralf Bierig,et al. Time, location and interest: an empirical and user-centred study , 2006, IIiX.
[28] Pia Borlund. Interactive Information Retrieval in Digital Environments , 2009 .
[29] Xiaojun Jenny Yuan,et al. Supporting Multiple Information-Seeking Strategies in a Single System Framework , 2006, NAACL.
[30] Nina Wacholder,et al. Using interview data to identify evaluation criteria for interactive, analytical question-answering systems , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[31] Qi Li,et al. How Up-to-date should it be? the Value of Instant Profiling and Adaptation in Information Filtering , 2007, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07).
[32] Peter Ingwersen,et al. The Word Association Methodology - A Gateway to Work-Task Based Retrieval , 1999, MIRA.
[33] Ryen W. White,et al. A study of interface support mechanisms for interactive information retrieval , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[34] Ryen W. White,et al. Finding relevant documents using top ranking sentences: an evaluation of two alternative schemes , 2002, SIGIR '02.
[35] Birger Larsen,et al. Report on the INEX 2004 interactive track , 2005, SIGF.
[36] Erik Frøkjær,et al. Improving web search transparency by using a Venn diagram interface , 2008, NordiCHI.
[37] Ryen W. White,et al. Web document summarisation: a task-oriented evaluation , 2001, 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.
[38] Elaine Toms,et al. Task Effects on Interactive Search: The Query Factor , 2008, INEX.
[39] Luanne Freund,et al. Exploiting task-document relations in support of information retrieval in the workplace , 2008, SIGF.
[40] Pia Borlund,et al. The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[41] Mette Skov,et al. Exploring information seeking behaviour in a digital museum context , 2008, IIiX.
[42] Norbert Fuhr,et al. Designing a User Interface for Interactive Retrieval of Structured Documents - Lessons Learned from the INEX Interactive Track , 2006, ECDL.
[43] Ryen W. White,et al. Using top-ranking sentences to facilitate effective information access , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[44] Diane Kelly,et al. Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users , 2009, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..
[45] Ben Shneiderman,et al. Users can change their web search tactics: Design guidelines for categorized overviews , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..
[46] Birger Larsen,et al. The Interactive Track at INEX 2004 , 2004, INEX.
[47] Ryen W. White,et al. Query-biased web page summarisation: a task-oriented evaluation , 2001, SIGIR '01.
[48] Ryen W. White,et al. NewsFlash: Adaptive TV News Delivery on the Web , 2003, Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval.
[49] Eija Airio,et al. Who benefits from CLIR in web retrieval? , 2008, J. Documentation.
[50] Birger Larsen,et al. The Interactive Track at INEX 2005 , 2005, INEX.
[51] Bernard J. Jansen,et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of and patterns of interactions with automated searching assistance: Research Articles , 2005 .
[52] George Buchanan,et al. The PRET A Rapporter framework: Evaluating digital libraries from the perspective of information work , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..
[53] Ryen W. White,et al. Studying the use of popular destinations to enhance web search interaction , 2007, SIGIR.
[54] Daniela Petrelli,et al. Observing users, designing clarity: A case study on the user-centered design of a cross-language information retrieval system , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[55] Nina Wacholder,et al. A model for quantitative evaluation of an end-to-end question-answering system , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[56] Mounia Lalmas,et al. Feature- and Query-Based Table of Contents Generation for XML Documents , 2007, ECIR.
[57] Colleen Cool. The Concept of Situation in Information Science. , 2001 .
[58] Birger Larsen,et al. Users, structured documents and overlap: interactive searching of elements and the influence of context on search behaviour , 2006, IIiX.
[59] Lei Wen,et al. The Effects on Topic Familiarity on Online Search Behaviour and Use of Relevance Criteria , 2006, ECIR.
[60] Joemon M. Jose,et al. A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Search Result Presentation on the Web , 2006, ECIR.
[61] Marianne Lykke,et al. Task-based evaluation of associative thesaurus in real-life environment , 2004, ASIST.
[62] Jaana Kekäläinen,et al. Ontology as a Search-Tool: A Study of Real Users' Query Formulation With and Without Conceptual Support , 2005, ECIR.
[63] C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al. Incorporating user search behavior into relevance feedback , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[64] Guisseppi A. Forgionne,et al. Testing a decision-theoretic approach to the evaluation of information retrieval systems , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..
[65] Stefano Mizzaro,et al. How many relevances in information retrieval? , 1998, Interact. Comput..
[66] Joemon M. Jose,et al. How users assess Web pages for information seeking , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[67] Nicholas J. Belkin,et al. Human versus machine in the topic distillation task , 2004, SIGIR '04.
[68] Pia Borlund,et al. The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..
[69] Jeonghyun Kim,et al. Task as a Context of Information Seeking: An Investigation of Daily Life Tasks on the Web , 2008 .
[70] Daniela Petrelli,et al. Which user interaction for cross-language information retrieval? Design issues and reflections , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[71] Ian Ruthven,et al. Abduction, explanation and relevance feedback , 1999 .
[72] Mounia Lalmas,et al. The Use of Summaries in XML Retrieval , 2006, ECDL.
[73] Pia Borlund,et al. Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2000, J. Documentation.
[74] Gary Marchionini,et al. A study of real-time query expansion effectiveness , 2006, SIGIR '06.
[75] Dragomir R. Radev,et al. Hierarchical summarization for delivering information to mobile devices , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..
[76] Nils Pharo,et al. Context Matters: An Analysis of Assessments of XML Documents , 2005, CoLIS.
[77] Ryen W. White,et al. A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..
[78] Katriina Byström,et al. Evaluation of an Information System in an Information Seeking Process , 2004, ECDL.
[79] Daniela Petrelli,et al. Exploring the Effect of Query Translation when Searching Cross-Language , 2002, CLEF.
[80] Yiming Yang,et al. An evaluation of adaptive filtering in the context of realistic task-based information exploration , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..
[81] Ayse Göker,et al. Evaluation of a mobile information system in context , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..
[82] Ryen W. White,et al. An implicit feedback approach for interactive information retrieval , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..
[83] Joemon M. Jose,et al. Comparing collaborative and independent search in a recall-oriented task , 2008, IIiX.
[84] Ryen W. White,et al. A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback , 2005, SIGIR '05.
[85] Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al. Empirical studies of end-user information searching , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[86] Nils Pharo. The effect of granularity and order in XML element retrieval , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..
[87] Birger Larsen,et al. Exploiting citation overlaps for Information Retrieval: Generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers , 2002, Scientometrics.
[88] Pia Borlund,et al. User-Centred Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems , 2009, Information Retrieval.
[89] Kuang-hua Chen. Evaluating Chinese text retrieval with multilingual queries , 2002 .
[90] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Information Retrieval Interaction , 1992 .
[91] Pertti Vakkari,et al. Subject knowledge improves interactive query expansion assisted by a thesaurus , 2004, J. Documentation.
[92] John Davies,et al. Information Retrieval: Searching in the 21st Century , 2009, Information Retrieval.
[93] Joemon M. Jose,et al. Affective feedback: an investigation into the role of emotions in the information seeking process , 2008, SIGIR '08.
[94] Mette Skov,et al. Inter and intra-document contexts applied in polyrepresentation for best match IR , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..
[95] Preben Hansen,et al. Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[96] Keith van Rijsbergen,et al. Ranking expansion terms with partial and ostensive evidence , 2002 .
[97] Jaana Kekäläinen,et al. User evaluation of ontology as query construction tool , 2006, Information Retrieval.
[98] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Searchers' relevance judgments and criteria in evaluating web pages in a learning style perspective , 2008, IIiX.
[99] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Measures of relative relevance and ranked half-life: performance indicators for interactive IR , 1998, SIGIR '98.
[100] Ryen W. White,et al. Leveraging popular destinations to enhance Web search interaction , 2008, TWEB.
[101] Bradford Lee Eden. Interactive Information Retrieval in Digital Environments , 2009 .
[102] Stefano Mizzaro,et al. Strategic help in user interfaces for information retrieval , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[103] Peter Ingwersen,et al. The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.
[104] Ioannis Arapakis. Affective feedback: an investigation into the role of emotions in the information seeking process , 2008, SIGIR.
[105] George W. Furnas,et al. Model-driven formative evaluation of exploratory search: A study under a sensemaking framework , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..
[106] Jaap Kamps,et al. Access to archival material in context , 2008, IIiX.
[107] Nicholas J. Belkin,et al. Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects , 2004, SIGIR '04.
[108] Ralf Bierig,et al. Event and map content personalisation in a mobile and context-aware-environment , 2010, SIGF.
[109] Joemon M. Jose,et al. Slicing and dicing the information space using local contexts , 2006, IIiX.
[110] Pia Borlund,et al. Evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2000 .
[111] Peter Ingwersen,et al. The Application of Work Tasks in Connection with the Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems: Empirical Results , 1999, MIRA.
[112] Bernard J. Jansen,et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of and patterns of interactions with automated searching assistance , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..