Reconsideration of the simulated work task situation: a context instrument for evaluation of information retrieval interaction

The present paper reports on the initial study and the preliminary findings of how the concept of simulated work task situation is reported used in the research literature. The overall objective of the study is in a systematic manner to learn how and for what types of evaluations the concept is applied. In particular we are interested to learn whether the recommendations for how to apply simulated work task situations are followed. The preliminary findings indicate a need for clarifications of the recommendations of how to use simulated work task situations. Particularly with respect to 'realism' of the simulated work task situations, which is emphasised through the need for tailoring of the simulated work task situations towards the group of study participant to ensure the depicted situations are realistic and interesting from the participants' point of view. Likewise it seems that the recommendation to involve the study participants' own information needs (to function as baseline of search interaction) is generally neglected in the reported studies.

[1]  Orland Hoeber ExploringWeb Search Results by Visually Specifying Utility Functions , 2007 .

[2]  Preben Hansen,et al.  SICS at iCLEF 2002: Cross-Language Relevance Assessment and Task Context , 2002, CLEF.

[3]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 1997, J. Documentation.

[4]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Enterprise search behaviour of software engineers , 2006, SIGIR.

[5]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  On the role of user-centred evaluation in the advancement of interactive information retrieval , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  An analysis of two approaches in information retrieval: From frameworks to study designs , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies: Book Reviews , 2005 .

[8]  Jenny Craven,et al.  A task-based approach to assessing the accessibility of web sites , 2007 .

[9]  Raya Fidel,et al.  Ranking expansion terms using partial and ostensive evidence , 2002 .

[10]  Robert Villa,et al.  FacetBrowser: a user interface for complex search tasks , 2008, ACM Multimedia.

[11]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  An examination of automatic video retrieval technology on access to the contents of an historical video archive , 2008, Program.

[12]  Jenny Craven Access to electronic resources by visually impaired people , 2003, Inf. Res..

[13]  Renata Pontin de Mattos Fortes,et al.  System Description: An Orienteering Strategy to Browse Semantically-Enhanced Educational Wiki Pages , 2007, ESWC.

[14]  C. Benito Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) , 2003 .

[15]  Ian Ruthven,et al.  Searcher's Assessments of Task Complexity for Web Searching , 2004, ECIR.

[16]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Investigating the use of summarisation for interactive XML retrieval , 2006, SAC.

[17]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Binary and graded relevance in IR evaluations--Comparison of the effects on ranking of IR systems , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Using top-ranking sentences to facilitate effective information access: Book Reviews , 2005 .

[19]  Ivan Koychev,et al.  Query-Based Document Skimming: A User-Centred Evaluation of Relevance Profiling , 2003, ECIR.

[20]  Birger Larsen,et al.  Report on the INEX 2005 interactive track , 2007, SIGF.

[21]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  Spatial querying for image retrieval: a user-oriented evaluation , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[22]  Lois M. L. Delcambre,et al.  Semantic components enhance retrieval of domain-specific documents , 2007, CIKM '07.

[23]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  Searchers' criteria For assessing web pages , 2003, SIGIR '03.

[24]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Cognitive shifts related to interactive information retrieval , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..

[25]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  Effectiveness of additional representations for the search result presentation on the web , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[26]  Kerry Rodden,et al.  Does organisation by similarity assist image browsing? , 2001, CHI.

[27]  Ralf Bierig,et al.  Time, location and interest: an empirical and user-centred study , 2006, IIiX.

[28]  Pia Borlund Interactive Information Retrieval in Digital Environments , 2009 .

[29]  Xiaojun Jenny Yuan,et al.  Supporting Multiple Information-Seeking Strategies in a Single System Framework , 2006, NAACL.

[30]  Nina Wacholder,et al.  Using interview data to identify evaluation criteria for interactive, analytical question-answering systems , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Qi Li,et al.  How Up-to-date should it be? the Value of Instant Profiling and Adaptation in Information Filtering , 2007, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07).

[32]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Word Association Methodology - A Gateway to Work-Task Based Retrieval , 1999, MIRA.

[33]  Ryen W. White,et al.  A study of interface support mechanisms for interactive information retrieval , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[34]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Finding relevant documents using top ranking sentences: an evaluation of two alternative schemes , 2002, SIGIR '02.

[35]  Birger Larsen,et al.  Report on the INEX 2004 interactive track , 2005, SIGF.

[36]  Erik Frøkjær,et al.  Improving web search transparency by using a Venn diagram interface , 2008, NordiCHI.

[37]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Web document summarisation: a task-oriented evaluation , 2001, 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[38]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Task Effects on Interactive Search: The Query Factor , 2008, INEX.

[39]  Luanne Freund,et al.  Exploiting task-document relations in support of information retrieval in the workplace , 2008, SIGF.

[40]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Mette Skov,et al.  Exploring information seeking behaviour in a digital museum context , 2008, IIiX.

[42]  Norbert Fuhr,et al.  Designing a User Interface for Interactive Retrieval of Structured Documents - Lessons Learned from the INEX Interactive Track , 2006, ECDL.

[43]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Using top-ranking sentences to facilitate effective information access , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[44]  Diane Kelly,et al.  Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users , 2009, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[45]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Users can change their web search tactics: Design guidelines for categorized overviews , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[46]  Birger Larsen,et al.  The Interactive Track at INEX 2004 , 2004, INEX.

[47]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Query-biased web page summarisation: a task-oriented evaluation , 2001, SIGIR '01.

[48]  Ryen W. White,et al.  NewsFlash: Adaptive TV News Delivery on the Web , 2003, Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval.

[49]  Eija Airio,et al.  Who benefits from CLIR in web retrieval? , 2008, J. Documentation.

[50]  Birger Larsen,et al.  The Interactive Track at INEX 2005 , 2005, INEX.

[51]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of and patterns of interactions with automated searching assistance: Research Articles , 2005 .

[52]  George Buchanan,et al.  The PRET A Rapporter framework: Evaluating digital libraries from the perspective of information work , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[53]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Studying the use of popular destinations to enhance web search interaction , 2007, SIGIR.

[54]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Observing users, designing clarity: A case study on the user-centered design of a cross-language information retrieval system , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[55]  Nina Wacholder,et al.  A model for quantitative evaluation of an end-to-end question-answering system , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[56]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Feature- and Query-Based Table of Contents Generation for XML Documents , 2007, ECIR.

[57]  Colleen Cool The Concept of Situation in Information Science. , 2001 .

[58]  Birger Larsen,et al.  Users, structured documents and overlap: interactive searching of elements and the influence of context on search behaviour , 2006, IIiX.

[59]  Lei Wen,et al.  The Effects on Topic Familiarity on Online Search Behaviour and Use of Relevance Criteria , 2006, ECIR.

[60]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Search Result Presentation on the Web , 2006, ECIR.

[61]  Marianne Lykke,et al.  Task-based evaluation of associative thesaurus in real-life environment , 2004, ASIST.

[62]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Ontology as a Search-Tool: A Study of Real Users' Query Formulation With and Without Conceptual Support , 2005, ECIR.

[63]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  Incorporating user search behavior into relevance feedback , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[64]  Guisseppi A. Forgionne,et al.  Testing a decision-theoretic approach to the evaluation of information retrieval systems , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[65]  Stefano Mizzaro,et al.  How many relevances in information retrieval? , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[66]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  How users assess Web pages for information seeking , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[67]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Human versus machine in the topic distillation task , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[68]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[69]  Jeonghyun Kim,et al.  Task as a Context of Information Seeking: An Investigation of Daily Life Tasks on the Web , 2008 .

[70]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Which user interaction for cross-language information retrieval? Design issues and reflections , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[71]  Ian Ruthven,et al.  Abduction, explanation and relevance feedback , 1999 .

[72]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  The Use of Summaries in XML Retrieval , 2006, ECDL.

[73]  Pia Borlund,et al.  Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2000, J. Documentation.

[74]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  A study of real-time query expansion effectiveness , 2006, SIGIR '06.

[75]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  Hierarchical summarization for delivering information to mobile devices , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[76]  Nils Pharo,et al.  Context Matters: An Analysis of Assessments of XML Documents , 2005, CoLIS.

[77]  Ryen W. White,et al.  A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[78]  Katriina Byström,et al.  Evaluation of an Information System in an Information Seeking Process , 2004, ECDL.

[79]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Query Translation when Searching Cross-Language , 2002, CLEF.

[80]  Yiming Yang,et al.  An evaluation of adaptive filtering in the context of realistic task-based information exploration , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[81]  Ayse Göker,et al.  Evaluation of a mobile information system in context , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[82]  Ryen W. White,et al.  An implicit feedback approach for interactive information retrieval , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[83]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  Comparing collaborative and independent search in a recall-oriented task , 2008, IIiX.

[84]  Ryen W. White,et al.  A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[85]  Alistair G. Sutcliffe,et al.  Empirical studies of end-user information searching , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[86]  Nils Pharo The effect of granularity and order in XML element retrieval , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[87]  Birger Larsen,et al.  Exploiting citation overlaps for Information Retrieval: Generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers , 2002, Scientometrics.

[88]  Pia Borlund,et al.  User-Centred Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems , 2009, Information Retrieval.

[89]  Kuang-hua Chen Evaluating Chinese text retrieval with multilingual queries , 2002 .

[90]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Information Retrieval Interaction , 1992 .

[91]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Subject knowledge improves interactive query expansion assisted by a thesaurus , 2004, J. Documentation.

[92]  John Davies,et al.  Information Retrieval: Searching in the 21st Century , 2009, Information Retrieval.

[93]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  Affective feedback: an investigation into the role of emotions in the information seeking process , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[94]  Mette Skov,et al.  Inter and intra-document contexts applied in polyrepresentation for best match IR , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[95]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[96]  Keith van Rijsbergen,et al.  Ranking expansion terms with partial and ostensive evidence , 2002 .

[97]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  User evaluation of ontology as query construction tool , 2006, Information Retrieval.

[98]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Searchers' relevance judgments and criteria in evaluating web pages in a learning style perspective , 2008, IIiX.

[99]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Measures of relative relevance and ranked half-life: performance indicators for interactive IR , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[100]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Leveraging popular destinations to enhance Web search interaction , 2008, TWEB.

[101]  Bradford Lee Eden Interactive Information Retrieval in Digital Environments , 2009 .

[102]  Stefano Mizzaro,et al.  Strategic help in user interfaces for information retrieval , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[103]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[104]  Ioannis Arapakis Affective feedback: an investigation into the role of emotions in the information seeking process , 2008, SIGIR.

[105]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Model-driven formative evaluation of exploratory search: A study under a sensemaking framework , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[106]  Jaap Kamps,et al.  Access to archival material in context , 2008, IIiX.

[107]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[108]  Ralf Bierig,et al.  Event and map content personalisation in a mobile and context-aware-environment , 2010, SIGF.

[109]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  Slicing and dicing the information space using local contexts , 2006, IIiX.

[110]  Pia Borlund,et al.  Evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2000 .

[111]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Application of Work Tasks in Connection with the Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems: Empirical Results , 1999, MIRA.

[112]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of and patterns of interactions with automated searching assistance , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..