Males Shorten the Life Span of C. elegans Hermaphrodites via Secreted Compounds

Battle of the Sexes In many species, males compete with one another to propagate their own DNA, often to the detriment of females (see the Perspective by Promislow and Kaeberlein). Shi and Murphy (p. 536, published online 19 December) discovered that mating in Caenorhabditis species causes mothers to shrink and die soon after they have ceased producing progeny. Males appear to hijack the longevity and stress resistance pathways normally employed by the mothers to slow reproduction and somatic aging in times of stress. Maures et al. (p. 541, published online 29 November) explored why the presence of abundant mating-competent males causes a decrease in the life span of nematodes of the opposite sex and found that a secreted substance, possibly a pheromone, reproduced the effect of the males when transferred in the culture medium. Detection of pheromones from a female fruit fly is enough to cause changes in metabolism, reduce resistance to starvation, and shorten the life span of male flies. Gendron et al. (p. 544, published online 29 November) report that the signals from the female appear to be recognized by sensory receptors on the legs of male flies. Male nematodes produce a soluble signal that shortens the life span of worms of the opposite sex. [Also see Perspective by Promislow and Kaeberlein] How an individual’s longevity is affected by the opposite sex is still largely unclear. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, the presence of males accelerated aging and shortened the life span of individuals of the opposite sex (hermaphrodites), including long-lived or sterile hermaphrodites. The male-induced demise could occur without mating and required only exposure of hermaphrodites to medium in which males were once present. Such communication through pheromones or other diffusible substances points to a nonindividual autonomous mode of aging regulation. The male-induced demise also occurred in other species of nematodes, suggesting an evolutionary conserved process whereby males may induce the disposal of the opposite sex to save resources for the next generation or to prevent competition from other males.

[1]  J. Yew,et al.  Drosophila Life Span and Physiology Are Modulated by Sexual Perception and Reward , 2014, Science.

[2]  Donald L Riddle,et al.  Pheromone sensing regulates Caenorhabditis elegans lifespan and stress resistance via the deacetylase SIR-2.1 , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  A. Ludewig,et al.  Ascaroside signaling in C. elegans. , 2013, WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology.

[4]  Paul W Sternberg,et al.  Targeted metabolomics reveals a male pheromone and sex-specific ascaroside biosynthesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2012, ACS chemical biology.

[5]  E. Greer,et al.  The H3K27 demethylase UTX‐1 regulates C. elegans lifespan in a germline‐independent, insulin‐dependent manner , 2011, Aging cell.

[6]  Christian Braendle,et al.  A phylogeny and molecular barcodes for Caenorhabditis, with numerous new species from rotting fruits , 2011, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[7]  Cornelia I. Bargmann,et al.  Parallel evolution of domesticated Caenorhabditis species targets pheromone receptor genes , 2011, Nature.

[8]  Zheng Yan,et al.  Histone demethylase UTX-1 regulates C. elegans life span by targeting the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway. , 2011, Cell metabolism.

[9]  Simon Melov,et al.  Loss of intestinal nuclei and intestinal integrity in aging C. elegans , 2011, Aging cell.

[10]  M. Chalfie,et al.  Enhanced neuronal RNAi in C. elegans using SID-1 , 2010, Nature Methods.

[11]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  A Hub-and-Spoke Circuit Drives Pheromone Attraction and Social Behavior in C. elegans , 2009, Nature.

[12]  Paul W. Sternberg,et al.  A blend of small molecules regulates both mating and development in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2008, Nature.

[13]  A. Cutter Divergence times in Caenorhabditis and Drosophila inferred from direct estimates of the neutral mutation rate. , 2008, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  S. Gygi,et al.  An AMPK-FOXO Pathway Mediates Longevity Induced by a Novel Method of Dietary Restriction in C. elegans , 2007, Current Biology.

[15]  R. Butcher,et al.  Small-molecule pheromones that control dauer development in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.

[16]  S. Pletcher,et al.  Regulation of Drosophila Life Span by Olfaction and Food-Derived Odors , 2007, Science.

[17]  Hidetoshi Shimodaira,et al.  Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering , 2006, Bioinform..

[18]  Ilya G. Goldberg,et al.  Sarcopenia in the Caenorhabditis elegans pharynx correlates with muscle contraction rate over lifespan , 2006, Experimental Gerontology.

[19]  Weontae Lee,et al.  Chemical structure and biological activity of the Caenorhabditis elegans dauer-inducing pheromone , 2005, Nature.

[20]  I. Goldberg,et al.  Behavioral deficits during early stages of aging in Caenorhabditis elegans result from locomotory deficits possibly linked to muscle frailty. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[21]  Benjamin M. Bolstad,et al.  affy - analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level , 2004, Bioinform..

[22]  C. Kenyon,et al.  Regulation of C. elegans Longevity by Specific Gustatory and Olfactory Neurons , 2004, Neuron.

[23]  D. Hall,et al.  Stochastic and genetic factors influence tissue-specific decline in ageing C. elegans , 2002, Nature.

[24]  B. van Swinderen,et al.  A Caenorhabditis elegans pheromone antagonizes volatile anesthetic action through a go-coupled pathway. , 2002, Genetics.

[25]  Michael A. Costa,et al.  Regulation of DAF-2 receptor signaling by human insulin and ins-1, a member of the unusually large and diverse C. elegans insulin gene family. , 2001, Genes & development.

[26]  D L Riddle,et al.  Genetic, behavioral and environmental determinants of male longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2000, Genetics.

[27]  J. Apfeld,et al.  Regulation of lifespan by sensory perception in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1999, Nature.

[28]  D. Riddle,et al.  Control of C. elegans Larval Development by Neuronal Expression of a TGF-β Homolog , 1996, Science.

[29]  D. Riddle,et al.  Longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans reduced by mating but not gamete production , 1996, Nature.

[30]  L. Partridge,et al.  Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products , 1995, Nature.

[31]  C. Der,et al.  GTP-binding mutants of rab1 and rab2 are potent inhibitors of vesicular transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi complex , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  J. Hodgkin,et al.  More is not better: brood size and population growth in a self-fertilizing nematode , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Cori Bargmann,et al.  Control of larval development by chemosensory neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1991, Science.

[34]  J. N. Thomson,et al.  Mutant sensory cilia in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1986, Developmental biology.

[35]  T. Kirkwood Evolution of ageing , 1977, Nature.

[36]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[37]  Cheng Li,et al.  Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. , 2007, Biostatistics.