Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in VA hospitals.

BACKGROUND Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), when compared with conventional open surgical repair, has been shown to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. We performed a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data from the Department of Veterans Affairs to examine outcomes after elective aneurysm repair. STUDY DESIGN We studied 30-day mortality, 1-year survival, and postoperative complications in 1,904 patients who underwent elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR n=717 [37.7%]; open n=1,187 [62.3%]) at 123 Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals between May 1, 2001 and September 30, 2003. We investigated the influence of patient, operative, and hospital variables on outcomes. RESULTS Patients undergoing EVAR had significantly lower 30-day (3.1% versus 5.6%, p=0.01) and 1- year mortality rates (8.7% versus 12.1%, p=0.018) than patients having open repair. EVAR was associated with a decrease in 30-day postoperative mortality (adjusted odds ratio[OR]=0.59; 95% CI=0.36, 0.99; p=0.04). The risk of perioperative complications was much less after EVAR (15.5% versus 27.7%; p<0.001; unadjusted OR 0.48; 95% CI=0.38, 0.61; p<0.001). Patients operated on at low volume hospitals (25% of entire cohort) were more likely to have had open repair (31.3% compared with 15.9% EVAR; p<0.001) and a nearly two-fold increase in adjusted 30-day mortality risk (OR=1.9; 95% CI=1.19, 2.98; p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS In routine daily practice, veterans who undergo elective EVAR have substantially lower perioperative mortality and morbidity rates compared with patients having open repair. The benefits of a minimally invasive approach were readily apparent in this cohort, but we recommend using caution in choosing EVAR for all elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs until longer-term data on device durability are available.

[1]  Erik Buskens,et al.  Two-Year Outcomes after Conventional or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2005 .

[2]  G. Soulez,et al.  Pain and quality of life assessment after endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients at low risk. , 2005, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[3]  G Scott Gazelle,et al.  Elective endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: systematic review of short-term results. , 2002, Radiology.

[4]  F. Grover,et al.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[5]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. , 2001, Surgery.

[6]  Peter L Harris,et al.  Outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with conditions considered unfit for an open procedure: a report on the EUROSTAR experience. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  Erik Buskens,et al.  A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  G. Moneta,et al.  Comparison of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With Open Repair in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1), 30-Day Operative Mortality Results: Randomised Controlled Trial , 2006 .

[9]  S. Fisher,et al.  Mortality ascertainment in the veteran population: alternatives to the National Death Index. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Endovascular Repair Reduces Early and Late Morbidity Compared to Open Surgery for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2002 .

[11]  P. Desgranges,et al.  Mid-term results of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients anatomically suitable for endovascular repair. , 2000, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[12]  D. Hosmer,et al.  A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  D. Baker,et al.  Haemodynamic and metabolic response to endovascular repair of infra-renal aortic aneurysms. , 1996, British journal of anaesthesia.

[15]  J. Parodi,et al.  Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms , 1991, Annals of vascular surgery.

[16]  S. Money,et al.  Comparison of open transabdominal AAA repair with endovascular AAA repair in reduction of postoperative stress response , 2001 .

[17]  T. Huber,et al.  Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States during 2001. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  S Lemeshow,et al.  The importance of assessing the fit of logistic regression models: a case study. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[19]  Jan D. Blankensteijn,et al.  Two-Year Outcomes After Conventional or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2005 .

[20]  F. Harrell,et al.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests. , 1982, JAMA.

[21]  E F Cook,et al.  Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. , 1999, Circulation.

[22]  N. Labropoulos,et al.  Predictors of Early Discharge following Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair , 2004, Annals of vascular surgery.

[23]  Stephane Elkouri,et al.  Most Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Are Not Suitable for Endovascular Repair Using Currently Approved Bifurcated Stent-Grafts , 2004, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[24]  B. Perler,et al.  Results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the 1990s: A population-based analysis of 2335 cases. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[25]  D. Zelt,et al.  Selective management of abdominal aortic aneurysms in a prospective measurement program. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  C. Ashton,et al.  Hospital use and survival among Veterans Affairs beneficiaries. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  F. Petersen,et al.  Quality of life before and after endovascular and retroperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  C. Mestres,et al.  Endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a comparison of early and intermediate results in patients suitable for both techniques. , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[29]  C. Maynard,et al.  Assessment of vital status in Department of Veterans Affairs national databases. comparison with state death certificates. , 2001, Annals of epidemiology.

[30]  B. McNeil,et al.  Outcome of myocardial infarction in Veterans Health Administration patients as compared with medicare patients. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  J. Boyle,et al.  Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses during endovascular and conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. , 1999, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[32]  Donald Rubin,et al.  Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[33]  S. Travis,et al.  Suitability for endovascular aneurysm repair in an unselected population , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[34]  R. Laheij,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes following Elective Open or Endovascular AAA Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2004, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[35]  E. Buskens,et al.  Quality of Life after Endovascular and Open AAA Repair. Results of a Randomised Trial , 2004 .

[36]  W S Moore,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 6-year comparison of endovascular versus transabdominal repair. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[37]  G. White,et al.  Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of 303 patients by life table method. , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[38]  Ethan A Halm,et al.  Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[39]  G. Cherr,et al.  Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[40]  Rodney A. White,et al.  The AneuRx stent graft: four-year results and worldwide experience 2000. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[41]  Rodney A. White,et al.  AneuRx stent graft versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: multicenter prospective clinical trial. , 1999, Journal of vascular surgery.

[42]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Health Status in VA Patients: Results from the Veterans Health Study , 1999, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.