Genetics of body condition score in New Zealand dairy cows.

Body condition score (BCS) data were collected on 169,661 first-parity cows from herds participating in progeny testing schemes and linear type assessment. Genetic and residual variances for BCS estimated across time using a quadratic random regression model were found to be largest at the start of lactation. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.32 to 0.23 from d 1 to 200 of lactation, with a mean of 0.26. Genetic correlations between BCS and other traits were estimated using 2 approaches: 1) a multivariate analysis that included BCS and live weight, both adjusted for stage of lactation; 270-d cumulative yields of milk, fat, and protein; average somatic cell score; and 2 measures of fertility; and 2) a bivariate random regression analysis in which BCS was considered to be a longitudinal trait across time, with the same measurements as in approach 1 for all other traits. Genetic correlations of BCS with the 2 fertility traits were 0.43 and 0.50 using the multivariate analysis; the corresponding random regression estimates between BCS as a longitudinal trait across time and 2 measures of fertility were 0.35 to 0.44 and 0.40 to 0.49, and tended to increase with stage of lactation. Genetic correlations estimated using the random regression model fluctuated around the multivariate estimates for live weight and somatic cell score, which were 0.50 and -0.12, respectively. Genetic correlations estimated using the multivariate analysis of BCS with fat and protein yields were close to zero. With the random regression model, genetic correlations between BCS and fat and protein yields were positive at d 1 of lactation (0.16 and 0.08, respectively) and were negative by d 200 of lactation (-0.25 and -0.20, respectively). In pastoral production systems, such as those typical in New Zealand, there appears to be an advantage in the total lactation yields of fat and protein for cows of higher BCS in early lactation, which is likely to be because these cows have body reserves that are available to be mobilized in later lactation, when feed resources are sometimes limited.

[1]  R. M. Koch,et al.  Heterosis retained in advanced generations of crosses among Angus and Hereford cattle. , 1985, Journal of animal science.

[2]  C. W. Holmes,et al.  Milk production from pasture. , 1987 .

[3]  P. Garnsworthy.  9 – THE EFFECT OF ENERGY RESERVES AT CALVING ON PERFORMANCE OF DAIRY COWS , 1988 .

[4]  Thomas B Farver,et al.  A Body Condition Scoring Chart for Holstein Dairy Cows , 1989 .

[5]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. , 1990, Genetics.

[6]  Robin Thompson,et al.  Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Variance Components for Univariate Animal Models Using Sparse Matrix Techniques and Average Information , 1995 .

[7]  Johnson Dl.  Estimation of lactation yield from repeated measures of test day yields , 1996 .

[8]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic covariance functions for live weight, condition score, and dry-matter intake measured at different lactation stages of Holstein Friesian heifers , 1998 .

[9]  S. Brotherstone,et al.  Genetic evaluation of Holstein Friesian sires for daughter condition-score changes using a random regression model , 1999 .

[10]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  A covariance function for feed intake, live weight, and milk yield estimated using a random regression model. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  J E Pryce,et al.  The genetic relationship between calving interval, body condition score and linear type and management traits in registered Holsteins. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic correlations among body condition score, yield, and fertility in first-parity cows estimated by random regression models. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  M. Goddard,et al.  Estimates of genetic parameters for daily somatic cell count of Australian dairy cattle. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  B. Harris,et al.  Review of Holsteinization on Intensive Pastoral Dairy Farming in New Zealand , 2001 .

[15]  G. Simm,et al.  The relationship between body condition score and reproductive performance. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  J S Clay,et al.  Heritability and correlations among body condition score loss, body condition score, production and reproductive performance. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  Robin Thompson,et al.  ASREML user guide release 1.0 , 2002 .

[18]  R F Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic parameters for level and change of body condition score and body weight in dairy cows. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  M. Keane.  Beef production from Holstein–Friesian bulls and steers of New Zealand and European/American descent, and Belgian Blue×Holstein–Friesians, slaughtered at two weights , 2003 .

[20]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic parameters for body condition score, body weight, milk yield, and fertility estimated using random regression models. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  J. Mee,et al.  The effect of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feeding system on reproductive performance in seasonal-calving milk production systems , 2004 .

[22]  Gerry C. Emmans,et al.  Prediction of body lipid change in pregnancy and lactation. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Body condition scores and dairy form evaluations as indicators of days open in US Holsteins. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  H. Kadarmideen.  Genetic correlations among body condition score, somatic cell score, milk production, fertility and conformation traits in dairy cows , 2004 .

[25]  Genetic and economic evaluation of dairy cow body condition score in New Zealand , 2004 .

[26]  B. Harris,et al.  Fertility breeding values in New Zealand, the next generation , 2005 .

[27]  J. Pryce,et al.  Breeding for body condition score in dairy cows. , 2005 .

[28]  J. Pryce,et al.  Body condition score as a candidate trait in the breeding worth dairy index , 2006 .