Design of an Algorithm for Automated, Computer-Guided PASI Measurements by Digital Image Analysis

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is the most accepted method for psoriasis severity scoring. However, a prominent level of subjectivity and a low intra- and inter-rater reproducibility was reported. Therefore, an accurate and reproducible measure of psoriasis severity is needed, especially in the setting of registration studies for systemic anti-psoriatic drugs. Herein we describe a robust, user-friendly, computer-guided technology that allows for automated PASI measurements after total body imaging and digital image analysis. For this purpose, a novel image processing software for PASI calculations was developed, which was combined with a commercially available, automated image capturing system. Our data shows, that the software was able to accurately calculate the proportion of psoriatic skin surface as well as the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation by anatomic region. In a pilot clinical validation the time-efficient technology showed a high reproducibility and high levels of agreement to results attained by PASI-trained physicians. Therefore, automated computer-guided PASI measurements hold the promise of significantly reducing the physicians’ workload while ensuring a high level of reproducibility and standardization.

[1]  Nhs Trust A study examining inter-and intrarater reliability of three scales for measuring severity of psoriasis:Psoriasis Area and Severity Index,Physician's Global Assessment and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment , 2006 .

[2]  D. DuBois,et al.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known , 1989 .

[3]  C. Oh,et al.  Objective assessment of involved surface area in patients with psoriasis , 2003, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[4]  Marko Kreft,et al.  Computer-aided measurement of psoriatic lesion area in a multicenter clinical trial--comparison to physician's estimations. , 2006, Journal of dermatological science.

[5]  F. Aubin,et al.  What are the best outcome measures for assessing plaque psoriasis severity? A systematic review of the literature , 2010, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[6]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Measurement of involved surface area in patients with psoriasis , 1991, The British journal of dermatology.

[7]  D. D. Bois,et al.  CLINICAL CALORIMETRY: TENTH PAPER A FORMULA TO ESTIMATE THE APPROXIMATE SURFACE AREA IF HEIGHT AND WEIGHT BE KNOWN , 1916 .

[8]  D. Loulmet,et al.  Results of the prospective multicenter trial of robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Efficient edge matching using improved hierarchical chamfer matching , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[10]  L. Naldi,et al.  Comparators, study duration, outcome measures and sponsorship in therapeutic trials of psoriasis: update of the EDEN Psoriasis Survey 2001–2006 , 2010, The British journal of dermatology.

[11]  Juan Lu,et al.  A quantitative technique for assessing the change in severity over time in psoriatic lesions using computer aided image analysis , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[12]  K. Reich,et al.  Psoriasis--new insights into pathogenesis and treatment. , 2009, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[13]  H. Orzechowski,et al.  S3 – Guidelines on the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris (English version). Update , 2012, Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG.

[14]  Rafael García,et al.  A New Total Body Scanning System for Automatic Change Detection in Multiple Pigmented Skin Lesions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  T. Smith,et al.  The C.I.E. colorimetric standards and their use , 1931 .

[16]  R. Langley,et al.  Evaluating psoriasis with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Psoriasis Global Assessment, and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[17]  Ahmad Hani Surface Imaging for Biomedical Applications , 2014 .

[18]  T Fredriksson,et al.  Severe psoriasis--oral therapy with a new retinoid. , 1978, Dermatologica.

[19]  H. Haenssle,et al.  Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[20]  K. Mclaren XIII—The Development of the CIE 1976 (L* a* b*) Uniform Colour Space and Colour‐difference Formula , 2008 .

[21]  H. Haenssle,et al.  Non‐invasive tools for the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma , 2017, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[22]  Josep Malvehy,et al.  Benefits of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy ("two-step method of digital follow-up") in the early diagnosis of melanoma in patients at high risk for melanoma. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[23]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature.

[24]  A M Tomé,et al.  A tool to automatically analyze electromagnetic tracking data from high dose rate brachytherapy of breast cancer patients , 2017, PloS one.

[25]  H. Orzechowski,et al.  S3 – Guidelines on the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris Update 2011 , 2011 .