Six degrees of separation: an exploratory network analysis of mentoring relationships in pediatric psychology.

OBJECTIVE The present study is an exploratory social network analysis of mentee-mentor relationships in the field of pediatric psychology. METHOD An online survey was distributed to members of the Division 54 Society of Pediatric Psychology (SPP) listserv asking them to name up to 10 psychologists from whom they had "received mentoring" and who influenced their careers. Directed network analyses were conducted to examine features of the resulting mentoring network. RESULTS Participants reported receiving mentoring in a wide variety of relationships and settings. The average "degrees of separation" between individuals in the network was 5.30. CONCLUSION : The field of pediatric psychology is interconnected with professionals learning from multiple mentors in multiple settings, extending beyond just graduate student advisors. Overall, many different mentors were listed, and there does not appear to be only one or two individuals providing the majority of mentoring within the field.

[1]  Brian C. Ladd,et al.  Another Hundred Days: Social Contacts in a Senior Class 1 , 2007 .

[2]  G. Koocher,et al.  Readings in Pediatric Psychology , 1993 .

[3]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[4]  Marilyn J. Amey,et al.  Some faculty leaders are born women , 1988 .

[5]  M. Roberts.  Introduction to Pediatric Psychology , 1993 .

[6]  M. Roberts.  Introduction to Pediatric Psychology An Historical Perspective , 1993 .

[7]  Michael C. Roberts,et al.  Handbook of pediatric psychology , 1995 .

[8]  W. Brad Johnson,et al.  Core Virtues for the Practice of Mentoring , 2001 .

[9]  Mark E. Swerdlik,et al.  A Survey of Mentoring Experiences in School Psychology. , 1988 .

[10]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The small-world phenomenon: an algorithmic perspective , 2000, STOC '00.

[11]  Mentoring reviewers: the Journal of Pediatric Psychology experience. , 2011, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[12]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Structural Analysis of Co-Author Relationships and Author Productivity in Selected Outlets for Consumer Behavior Research , 1999 .

[13]  Bethany S. Dohleman.  Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek , 2006 .

[14]  David Easley,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: The Small-World Phenomenon , 2010 .

[15]  Stanley Milgram,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem , 1969 .

[16]  D. Drotar.  Pioneers in pediatric psychology: between two professional worlds: personal reflections on a career in a pediatric setting. , 2001, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[17]  D. Drotar.  Martin P. Levin Distinguished Mentorship Award: reflections on mentorship in pediatric psychology: key issues and implications. , 2003, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[18]  W. Brad Johnson,et al.  Mentor Relationships in Clinical Psychology Doctoral Training: Results of a National Survey , 2000 .

[19]  Ronald T. Brown,et al.  Society of pediatric psychology task force report: recommendations for the training of pediatric psychologists. , 2003, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[20]  D. Watts,et al.  An Experimental Study of Search in Global Social Networks , 2003, Science.

[21]  David Liben-Nowell,et al.  An algorithmic approach to social networks , 2005 .

[22]  Cathleen C. Odar,et al.  Perceived benefits of mentoring in pediatric psychology: a qualitative approach. , 2012, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[23]  M. Black,et al.  Commentary: mentoring--benchmarks for work performance. , 2006, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[24]  Steven Walfish,et al.  Succeeding in Graduate School: The Career Guide for Psychology Students , 2001 .

[25]  Georgia T Chao.  Formal Mentoring: Lessons Learned From Past Practice , 2009 .