On the estimation of returns to scale, technical progress and monopolistic markups

A number of theoretical results on estimating returns to scale, technical progress and monopolistic markups are derived when there are multiple outputs and inputs. The choice of value added versus gross output and problems that arise in aggregation across sectors of an economy are also considered. Using US data on manufacturing, evidence is found of increasing returns to scale across all levels of aggregation. Technical progress is typically found to be insignificant implying that economic growth has been driven by increasing returns to scale rather than technical progress. Such findings have important implications for the macroeconomic modeling of economic fluctuations.

[1]  Hans P. Binswanger,et al.  The Measurement Of Technical Change Biases With Many Factors Of Production , 1973 .

[2]  E. Appelbaum.  Testing price taking behavior , 1979 .

[3]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  A. Madansky.  The fitting of straight lines when both variables are subject to error , 1959 .

[5]  Catherine J. Morrison,et al.  A microeconomic approach to the measurement of economic performance : productivity growth, capacity utilization, and related performance indicators , 1992 .

[6]  W. Diewert,et al.  New techniques in the measurement of multifactor productivity , 1990 .

[7]  P. Romer,et al.  Why, Indeed, in America? Theory, History, and the Origins of Modern Economic Growth , 1996 .

[8]  Jang‐Ting Guo.  Increasing returns, capital utilization, and the effects of government spending , 2004 .

[9]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  Parametric Productivity Measurement and Choice Among Flexible Functional Forms , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  T. W. Anderson.  Estimation of Linear Functional Relationships: Approximate Distributions and Connections with Simultaneous Equations in Econometrics , 1976 .

[11]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Returns to Scale in U.S. Production: Estimates and Implications , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Chas. H. Kummell,et al.  Reduction of Observation Equations Which Contain More Than One Observed Quantity , 1879 .

[13]  T. Haavelmo,et al.  The Probability Approach in Econometrics , 1944 .

[14]  Masao Nakamura,et al.  AN INDEX NUMBER METHOD FOR ESTIMATING SCALE ECONOMIES AND TECHNICAL PROGRESS USING TIME-SERIES OF CROSS-SECTION DATA: SOURCES OF TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH FOR JAPANESE MANUFACTURING, 1964-1988 , 1998 .

[15]  Allen C. Head,et al.  Monopolistic Competition, Increasing Returns, and the Effects of Government Spending , 1996 .

[16]  D. Burgess.  A Cost Minimization Approach to Import Demand Equations , 1974 .

[17]  Paul Schreyer,et al.  The OECD Productivity Manual: A Guide to the Measurement of Industry-Level and Aggregate Productivity , 2001 .

[18]  Dan Usher,et al.  Accounting for United States Economic Growth, 1929-1969 , 1974 .

[19]  W. Erwin Diewert,et al.  The Measurement of Waste within the Production Sector of an Open Economy , 1983 .

[20]  D. V. Lindley,et al.  Regression Lines and the Linear Functional Relationship , 1947 .

[21]  T. Haavelmo.  The Statistical Implications of a System of Simultaneous Equations , 1943 .

[22]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators When Output Prices are Unobserved and Engogenous , 1992 .

[23]  W. Roeger.  Can Imperfect Competition Explain the Difference between Primal and Dual Productivity Measures? Estimates for U.S. Manufacturing , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  R. J. Adcock.  A Problem in Least Squares , 1878 .

[25]  L. Törnqvist.  The Bank of Finland's consumption price index , 1936 .

[26]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[27]  E. Bartelsman.  Of empty boxes: Returns to scale revisited , 1995 .

[28]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[29]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the black box: Why in America? , 1994 .

[30]  Maurice G. Kendall,et al.  Inference and relationship , 1979 .

[31]  N. Rosenberg.  Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910 , 1963, The Journal of Economic History.

[32]  Robert C. Allen,et al.  Direct versus Implicit Superlative Index Number Formulae , 1981 .

[33]  Michael D. Intriligator,et al.  Frontiers of Quantitative Economics. , 1972 .

[34]  W. H. Andrews.  Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production , 1944 .

[35]  John G. Fernald,et al.  Aggregate Productivity and Aggregate Technology , 1997 .

[36]  Otto Mayr,et al.  Yankee Enterprise: The Rise of the American System of Manufactures , 1982 .

[37]  Thomas Hintermaier,et al.  On the minimum degree of returns to scale in sunspot models of the business cycle , 2003, J. Econ. Theory.

[38]  P. Beaudry,et al.  Money and the real exchange rate with sticky prices and increasing returns , 1995 .

[39]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Estimation and inference in econometrics , 1994 .

[40]  R. Frisch.  Statistical confluence analysis by means of complete regression systems , 1934 .

[41]  P. Weil.  Increasing Returns and Animal Spirits , 1989 .

[42]  R. Hall,et al.  Invariance Properties of Solow&Apos;S Productivity Residual , 1989 .

[43]  R. Shephard.  Cost and production functions , 1953 .

[44]  Ronald W. Shephard,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of the Incidence of Taxation , 1944 .

[45]  B. Dent.  On observations of points connected by a linear relation , 1935 .

[46]  P. David,et al.  Convergence and deferred catch-up. Productivity leadership and the waning of American exceptionalism , 1994 .

[47]  C. Burnside,et al.  Production function regressions, returns to scale, and externalities , 1996 .

[48]  Peter A. Diamond,et al.  Optimal Taxation and Public Production II: Tax Rules , 1971 .

[49]  Roger E. A. Farmer,et al.  Indeterminacy and Increasing Returns , 1994 .

[50]  Catherine J. Morrison.  Unraveling the Productivity Growth Slowdown in the U.S., Canada and Japan: The Effects of Subequilibrium, Scale Economies and Markup , 1989 .

[51]  M. Kendall,et al.  Regression, structure and functional relationship. Part I. , 1951, Biometrika.

[52]  Walter Diewert,et al.  Exact and superlative index numbers , 1976 .

[53]  Donald Siegel,et al.  External Capital Factors and Increasing Returns in U.S. Manufacturing , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[54]  R. G. D. Allen.  The Assumptions of Linear Regression , 1939 .

[55]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence From Patent Records, 1790–1846 , 1988, The Journal of Economic History.

[56]  Robert E. Hall,et al.  The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[57]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry , 1992 .

[58]  M. A. Creasy.  CONFIDENCE LIMITS FOR THE GRADIENT IN THE LINEAR FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP , 1956 .

[59]  M. McElroy.  Additive General Error Models for Production, Cost, and Derived Demand or Share Systems , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.