Routine and the perception of time.

The authors investigated the influence of routine on people's estimation of time, testing the hypothesis that duration is remembered as being shorter when time is spent in a routine activity. In 4 experiments and 2 field studies, the authors compared time estimations in routine and nonroutine conditions. Routine was established by a sequence of markers (Study 1), variation of the task (Studies 2 and 3), or the number of repetitive blocks (Study 4). As hypothesized, the duration of the task was remembered as being shorter in routine conditions than in nonroutine ones. This trend was reversed in experienced (prospective) judgments when participants were informed beforehand of the duration-judgment task (Study 3). In Studies 5 and 6, the authors examined remembered duration judgments of vacationers and kibbutz members, which provided further support for the main hypothesis.

[1]  Noah Webster,et al.  Webster's new collegiate dictionary , 1936 .

[2]  P. Fraisse The psychology of time , 1963 .

[3]  Douglas Poynter,et al.  Chapter 8 Judging the Duration of Time Intervals: A Process of Remembering Segments of Experience , 1989 .

[4]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[5]  D. Avni-Babad Mental undoing of actions and inactions in the absence of counterfactuals. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[6]  R. Byrne,et al.  Counterfactual thinking about actions and failures to act. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Richard A. Block,et al.  Contextual Coding in Memory: Studies of Remembered Duration , 1985 .

[8]  Richard A. Block,et al.  Chapter 9 Experiencing and Remembering Time: Affordances, Context, and Cognition , 1989 .

[9]  Y Tsal,et al.  The role of segmentation in prospective and retrospective time estimation processes , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[11]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Judgments of Affect , 1990 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[13]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[14]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Teachers' brief nonverbal behaviors in defined instructional situations can predict students' evaluations. , 2003 .

[15]  Jeffrey M. Quinn,et al.  Habits in everyday life: thought, emotion, and action. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  R. Block Temporal judgments and contextual change. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  D. Gopher,et al.  Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. , 1999 .

[18]  D. Homa,et al.  Duration judgment and the experience of change , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  J. Landman Regret and Elation Following Action and Inaction , 1987 .

[20]  R. Ornstein,et al.  The experience of time , 1986 .

[21]  D. Zakay Time Estimation Methods—Do They Influence Prospective Duration Estimates? , 1993, Perception.

[22]  W. Poynter,et al.  Duration judgment and the segmentation of experience , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[23]  I. Ritov The role of expectations in comparisons. , 2000, Psychological review.

[24]  J. Baron,et al.  Outcome Knowledge, Regret, and Omission Bias , 1995 .

[25]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[26]  Richard A. Block,et al.  Remembered Duration: Evidence for a Contextual-Change Hypothesis , 2005 .

[27]  Richard A. Block,et al.  Remembered duration: Effects of event and sequence complexity , 1978 .

[28]  R. Block,et al.  Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.