Increased variability accompanies frontal lobe damage in dementia

Performance variability on neuropsychological measures is not a unitary phenomenon, and different measures (consistency, dispersion, diversity) evaluate separate elements of variability. It has been suggested that increased variability may be a specific attribute of frontal lobe pathology. This hypothesis was tested in 2 matched groups of demented subjects, 8 with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT), 5 with frontal lobe dementia (FLD), compared with 10 elderly normal controls (ENC). A Stroop test and Reaction Time measures were administered weekly for 5 weeks to all subjects. Both measures contained three subtests varying in degree of complexity. The results from the Stroop task indicated that the FLD group showed significantly greater variability on measures of consistency (fluctuations over time) and diversity (between participant variability) regardless of the complexity of the subtest. For the Reaction Time subtests, measures of consistency and diversity showed significantly greater variability in FLD, but were affected in a different pattern. Greater variability in terms of consistency of performance was manifested only in the more attentionally demanding of the Reaction Time subtests (Choice Reaction Time, CRT). On the measure of diversity, variable performance was found to be greater on the Simple Reaction Time (SRT) subtest than on the more effortful CRT. Dispersion (within participant variability) was only assessed on the reaction time subtests. The results indicate no significant evidence for an increase in dispersion for the FLD patients. The hypothesis that variability will be increased in frontal lobe dementia is thus confirmed, and the independence of the three forms of variability measurement is demonstrated in dementia subjects. (JINS, 2002, 8, 360–372.)

[1]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[2]  Donald T. Stuss,et al.  Aging and Variability in Performance , 1998 .

[3]  John R. Hodges,et al.  Fronto-Temporal Lobar Degeneration: Fronto-Temporal Dementia, Progressive Aphasia, Semantic Dementia. , 1997 .

[4]  A. Kertesz,et al.  Frontal Behavioral Inventory: Diagnostic Criteria for Frontal Lobe Dementi , 1997, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[5]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition: An Empirical Review of PET Studies with Normal Subjects , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  K. Boone,et al.  Comparison of neuropsychological functioning in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia , 1996, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[7]  Julie S. Snowden,et al.  Fronto-Temporal Lobar Degeneration: Fronto-Temporal Dementia, Progressive Aphasia, Semantic Dementia , 1996 .

[8]  D. Balota,et al.  Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  E. Warrington,et al.  Towards a unitary account of access dysphasia: a single case study. , 1995, Memory.

[10]  Donald T. Stuss,et al.  Characterization of stability of performance in patients with traumatic brain injury: Variability and consistency on reaction time tests. , 1994 .

[11]  Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia. The Lund and Manchester Groups. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  C K Morse Does variability increase with age? An archival study of cognitive measures. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[13]  A. Brun,et al.  Frontal lobe degeneration of non‐Alzheimer type , 1992, Bailliere's clinical neurology.

[14]  R. Dixon,et al.  Intraindividual change in text recall of the elderly , 1992, Brain and Language.

[15]  A neuropsychological investigation into frontal lobe involvement in Dementia of the Alzheimer Type , 1992 .

[16]  Marcia C. Smith,et al.  A Comparison of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test with the Modified Card Sorting Test for Use with Older Adults , 1991 .

[17]  Barry Gordon,et al.  The basis for choice reaction time slowing in Alzheimer's disease , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[18]  D. Stuss,et al.  Reaction time after head injury: fatigue, divided and focused attention, and consistency of performance. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  A. Johanson,et al.  Psychometric characteristics in patients with frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type. , 1989, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[20]  J. Myerson,et al.  Age, variability, and speed: between-subjects diversity. , 1988, Psychology and aging.

[21]  J. Kwentus,et al.  Modified wisconsin sorting test in elderly normal, depressed and demented patients , 1988 .

[22]  T. Shallice,et al.  Frontal lesions and sustained attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  M. Gibson,et al.  Beyond ANOVA: Basics of Applied Statistics. , 1986 .

[24]  M. Folstein,et al.  Cognitive impairment of Alzheimer disease. , 1983, Neurobehavioral toxicology and teratology.

[25]  H. Spinnler The prefrontal cortex, Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe, J.M. Fuster. Raven Press, New York (1980), IX-222 pages , 1981 .

[26]  J. Fuster Prefrontal Cortex , 2018 .

[27]  P Rabbitt,et al.  Selective anticipation for events in old age. , 1980, Journal of gerontology.

[28]  C. Dodrill A Neuropsychological Battery for Epilepsy , 1978, Epilepsia.

[29]  N. C. Waugh,et al.  Effects of age and frequency of stimulus repetitions on two-choice reaction time. , 1976, Journal of gerontology.

[30]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[31]  E. Perret The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Arthur L. Benton,et al.  Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease , 1968 .

[33]  J. Botwinick,et al.  A research note on individual differences in reaction time in relation to age. , 1968, The Journal of Genetic Psychology.