A public and patient consultation process as an aid to design a person‐centred randomized clinical trial

Involving patients and members of the public, together with researchers, in decisions about how studies are designed and conducted can create a study that is more person‐centred. The aim of this consultation process was to explore ways of designing a study which takes the person into consideration for the randomized clinical study entitled ‘Biomechanical Effects of Manual Therapy—A Feasibility Study’ using the novel approach of usability testing.

[1]  A. Breen,et al.  Stakeholder involvement in the development of trial material for a clinical trial , 2020, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[2]  I. Boutron,et al.  The research burden of randomized controlled trial participation: a systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence , 2020, BMC Medicine.

[3]  A. Anderson,et al.  A Novel Collaborative Approach to Building Better Clinical Trials: New Insights From a Patient Engagement Workshop to Propel Patient-Centricity Forward , 2019, Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science.

[4]  Eirik Årsand,et al.  Employing a user-centered cognitive walkthrough to evaluate a mHealth diabetes self-management application: A case study and beginning method validation , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[5]  M. Hughes,et al.  Public involvement in health and social sciences research: A concept analysis , 2018, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[6]  A. Hannigan.  Public and patient involvement in quantitative health research: A statistical perspective , 2018, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[7]  J. Kim,et al.  Patient-centered recruitment and retention for a randomized controlled study , 2018, Trials.

[8]  C. Gamble,et al.  ‘Recruitment, recruitment, recruitment’ – the need for more focus on retention: a qualitative study of five trials , 2018, Trials.

[9]  A. Kivitz,et al.  Simulating clinical trial visits yields patient insights into study design and recruitment , 2017, Patient preference and adherence.

[10]  Tim Sprosen,et al.  Priorities for methodological research on patient and public involvement in clinical trials: A modified Delphi process , 2017, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[11]  V. Montori,et al.  When patient-centred care is worth doing well: informed consent or shared decision-making , 2016, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[12]  N. Sharma.  Patient centric approach for clinical trials: Current trend and new opportunities , 2015, Perspectives in clinical research.

[13]  F. B. Pereira,et al.  Impact of gender on the decision to participate in a clinical trial: a cross-sectional study , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[14]  Karen L. Schmidt,et al.  A New Measure of Research Participant Burden , 2014, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[15]  Zhiyuan Zheng,et al.  Patient-centeredness in the design of clinical trials. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[16]  D. Lavallee,et al.  Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. , 2012, JAMA.

[17]  J. Tritter,et al.  Revolution or evolution: the challenges of conceptualizing patient and public involvement in a consumerist world , 2009, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[18]  James Flory,et al.  Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. , 2004, JAMA.

[19]  Barbara Starfield,et al.  Is patient-centered care the same as person-focused care? , 2011, The Permanente journal.