Nanoconfinement of spider silk fibrils begets superior strength, extensibility, and toughness.

Silk is an exceptionally strong, extensible, and tough material made from simple protein building blocks. The molecular structure of dragline spider silk repeat units consists of semiamorphous and nanocrystalline β-sheet protein domains. Here we show by a series of computational experiments how the nanoscale properties of silk repeat units are scaled up to create macroscopic silk fibers with outstanding mechanical properties despite the presence of cavities, tears, and cracks. We demonstrate that the geometric confinement of silk fibrils to diameters of 50 ± 30 nm is critical to facilitate a powerful mechanism by which hundreds of thousands of protein domains synergistically resist deformation and failure to provide enhanced strength, extensibility, and toughness at the macroscale, closely matching experimentally measured mechanical properties. Through this mechanism silk fibers exploit the full potential of the nanoscale building blocks, regardless of the details of microscopic loading conditions and despite the presence of large defects. Experimental results confirm that silk fibers are composed of silk fibril bundles with diameters in the range of 20-150 nm, in agreement with our predicted length scale. Our study reveals a general mechanism to map nanoscale properties to the macroscale and provides a potent design strategy toward novel fiber and bulk nanomaterials through hierarchical structures.

[1]  B. Swanson,et al.  The evolution of complex biomaterial performance: The case of spider silk. , 2009, Integrative and comparative biology.

[2]  Zhiping Xu,et al.  Nanoconfinement Controls Stiffness, Strength and Mechanical Toughness of Β-sheet Crystals in Silk , 2010 .

[3]  Yang Li,et al.  Structural Origin of the Strain‐Hardening of Spider Silk , 2011 .

[4]  F. Vollrath Silk evolution untangled , 2010, Nature.

[5]  Randolph V Lewis,et al.  Spider silk: ancient ideas for new biomaterials. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[6]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[7]  M. Elices,et al.  Fractographic analysis of silkworm and spider silk , 2002 .

[8]  J. Gosline,et al.  The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  Frische,et al.  Elongate cavities and skin–core structure in Nephila spider silk observed by electron microscopy , 1998 .

[10]  D. Kunkel,et al.  Physical and chemical microstructure of spider dragline: A study by analytical transmission electron microscopy , 1994 .

[11]  Baohua Ji,et al.  Mechanical properties of nanostructure of biological materials , 2004 .

[12]  M. E. Demont,et al.  Spider silk as rubber , 1984, Nature.

[13]  Todd A. Blackledge,et al.  Variation in the material properties of spider dragline silk across species , 2006 .

[14]  H Goncalves,et al.  Scanning , 2004, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[15]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[16]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Nanoscale toughness of spider silk , 2007 .

[17]  David L. Kaplan,et al.  New Opportunities for an Ancient Material , 2010, Science.

[18]  S. Rammensee,et al.  Assembly mechanism of recombinant spider silk proteins , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  F. Vollrath,et al.  Structural organization of spider silk , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  D. H. Tsai The virial theorem and stress calculation in molecular dynamics , 1979 .

[21]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Dynamical fracture instabilities due to local hyperelasticity at crack tips , 2006, Nature.

[22]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SPIDER'S SILK AND THEIR ROLE IN THE DESIGN OF ORB-WEBS , 1976 .

[23]  Y. Termonia Molecular modeling of spider silk elasticity , 1994 .

[24]  B. Ji A study of the interface strength between protein and mineral in biological materials. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  G. Plaza,et al.  Fracture surfaces and tensile properties of UV‐irradiated spider silk fibers , 2007 .

[26]  A. A. Griffith The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids , 1921 .

[27]  Hiroshi Tada,et al.  The stress analysis of cracks handbook , 2000 .

[28]  Tsu-Wei Chou,et al.  Microstructural design of fiber composites: Short-fiber composites , 1992 .

[29]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Deformation and failure of protein materials in physiologically extreme conditions and disease. , 2009, Nature materials.

[30]  H. Hansma,et al.  Molecular nanosprings in spider capture-silk threads , 2003, Nature materials.

[31]  C. Viney,et al.  Spider major ampullate silk (drag line): smart composite processing based on imperfect crystals , 1997 .

[32]  Baohua Ji,et al.  Cracking and adhesion at small scales: atomistic and continuum studies of flaw tolerant nanostructures , 2006, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering.

[33]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk , 2001, Nature.

[34]  D. Porter,et al.  Spider silk as a model biomaterial , 2006 .

[35]  Steve Plimpton,et al.  Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics , 1993 .

[36]  F. Kremer,et al.  Hierarchies in the structural organization of spider silk—a quantitative model , 2009 .

[37]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Geometric confinement governs the rupture strength of H-bond assemblies at a critical length scale. , 2008, Nano letters.

[38]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Silk polymers : materials science and biotechnology , 1993 .

[39]  Francois Barthelat,et al.  Merger of structure and material in nacre and bone - Perspectives on de novo biomimetic materials , 2009 .

[40]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: Lessons from nature , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Lian Li,et al.  Design of superior spider silk: from nanostructure to mechanical properties. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[42]  P. Muehlig,et al.  Glycoproteins and skin-core structure in Nephila clavipes spider silk observed by light and electron microscopy. , 2006, Scanning.

[43]  R. Lewis,et al.  Molecular mechanism of spider silk elasticity. , 1991, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[44]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Nanostructure and molecular mechanics of spider dragline silk protein assemblies , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[45]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Flaw Tolerance in a Thin Strip Under Tension , 2005 .

[46]  S. Tang,et al.  New internal structure of spider dragline silk revealed by atomic force microscopy. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[47]  M. Boyce,et al.  Constitutive Modeling of the Finite Deformation Behavior of Membranes Possessing a Triangulated Network Microstructure , 2006 .

[48]  Alberto Redaelli,et al.  Molecular and nanostructural mechanisms of deformation, strength and toughness of spider silk fibrils. , 2010, Nano letters.