Prosthetic Mitral Valve Thrombosis: Can Fluoroscopy Predict the Efficacy of Thrombolytic Treatment?

BackgroundThrombolysis (T) is an effective therapy for prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT). Debate still exists as to which clinical or noninvasive finding best predict the result of T. The aim of the study was to investigate the role of fluoroscopy (F) to predict efficacy of T in pts with mitral PVT. MethodsWe evaluated 17 consecutive pts with bileaflet mitral PVT. F criteria for PVT were: abnormal disc motion and calculated opening angle >25°. T was carried out with tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA; 100 mg over 3 hours followed by heparin infusion for 24 hours) and was considered successful when normalization of leaflet motion and opening angle occurred. Results were evaluated according to symptom duration (<21 days, early PVT; >21 days, late PVT) and to F pattern of PVT (blocked leaflet versus hypomobile leaflet). ResultsF showed disc motion alteration in 24 of 34 leaflets: 8 leaflets were blocked, whereas 16 were hypomobile. Early (12.7±6.1 days, range 3–21) and late (113±114 days, range 28–365) PVT was present in 8 and 7 pts, respectively. Thrombolysis was successful in 20 of 24 leaflets. Blocked leaflet fully recovered only in early PVT (n=4) pts, whereas they remained blocked in late PVT (n=4). On the contrary, in all of the cases with hypomobile leaflet, disc motion normalized regardless duration of symptoms and extent of disc motion reduction. Interestingly, 4 leaflets with late PVT was diagnosed as blocked by trans-thoracic (TTE). F showed a residual disc movement in all: they fully recovered after T. Two pts with late PVT had both leaflets affected (1 blocked +1 hypomobile); although blocked leaflet did not respond to T, the normalization of hypomobile significantly improved clinical condition. ConclusionsF can predict result of T in mitral PVT. PVT with F evidence of hypomobile leaflet always recovers regardless of symptom duration and extent of disc motion reduction, suggesting that the small amount of thrombus needed to interfere with discs motion in bileaflet prostheses remains sensitive to T even after a long time. PVT with F evidence of blocked leaflet has a favorable response to T only in case of early PVT. Late PVT with blocked leaflet does not respond to T, suggesting a larger and stratified thrombus and the coexistence of pannus and, in our series, always required surgery. However, if a hypomobile leaflet coexists, T may be used to restore normal movement of hypomobile leaflet so that to improve patient clinical and hemodynamic condition before operation.

[1]  D Horstkotte,et al.  Prosthetic valve thrombosis. , 1995, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[2]  T. Wisenbaugh,et al.  Obstruction of mechanical heart valve prostheses: clinical aspects and surgical management. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  R. Gibbons,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). , 1998, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[4]  Y. Adler,et al.  Thrombolysis is an effective and safe therapy in stuck bileaflet mitral valves in the absence of high-risk thrombi. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  J Ross,et al.  Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  P. Gosse,et al.  Mechanical Cardiac Valve Thrombosis: Is Fibrinolysis Justified? , 1992, Circulation.

[7]  M. Quiñones,et al.  Differentiating thrombus from pannus formation in obstructed mechanical prosthetic valves: an evaluation of clinical, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic parameters. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  M. Pepi,et al.  Role of cine-fluoroscopy, transthoracic, and transesophageal echocardiography in patients with suspected prosthetic heart valve thrombosis. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  H. Schieffer,et al.  Cineradiography for determination of normal and abnormal function in mechanical heart valves. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  B. Raju,et al.  Thrombolysis in left-sided prosthetic valve occlusion: immediate and follow-up results. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  H. Schaff,et al.  Thrombotic obstruction of disc valves: clinical recognition and surgical management. , 1989, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  R. Gibbons,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). , 1998, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[13]  Randolph P. Martin,et al.  Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography for detection of abnormalities of prosthetic and bioprosthetic valves in the mitral and aortic positions. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  K. Smolle,et al.  [Thrombolytic therapy of acute pulmonary embolism]. , 1996, Der Internist.

[15]  Steven S. Khan,et al.  The St. Jude Valve Thrombolysis as the First Line of Therapy for Cardiac Valve Thrombosis , 1993, Circulation.

[16]  F. Carreras,et al.  Short-course thrombolysis as the first line of therapy for cardiac valve thrombosis. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  P. Guéret,et al.  Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Diagnosis and Management of Nonobstructive Thrombosis of Mechanical Mitral Valve Prosthesis , 1995, Circulation.

[18]  J. Chambers,et al.  Treatment of left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis: thrombolysis or surgery? , 2002, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[19]  N. Ozdemir,et al.  Intravenous thrombolytic treatment of mechanical prosthetic valve thrombosis: a study using serial transesophageal echocardiography. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  M. Pepi,et al.  Diagnosing prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis and the effect of the type of prosthesis. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  Ş. Yavuz,et al.  The use of transesophageal echocardiography guidance of thrombolytic therapy in prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis. , 2000, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[22]  J. Fontcuberta,et al.  Thrombolysis as the first line of therapy for cardiac valve thrombosis. , 1993, Circulation.

[23]  M. Sands,et al.  Diagnostic value of cinefluoroscopy in the evaluation of prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. , 1982, American heart journal.

[24]  J. Ross,et al.  Noninvasive evaluation of normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  A. Bartorelli,et al.  Valve design characteristics and cine-fluoroscopic appearance of five currently available bileaflet prosthetic heart valves. , 1996, American journal of cardiac imaging.

[26]  A. Bolger,et al.  Transesophageal two-dimensional echocardiography and color Doppler flow velocity mapping in the evaluation of cardiac valve prostheses. , 1988, Circulation.

[27]  V. Fuster,et al.  Guidelines for management of left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis: a role for thrombolytic therapy. Consensus Conference on Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  J. Loscalzo,et al.  Thrombolytic therapy of acute pulmonary embolism: current status and future potential. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.