Iterative Learning Control for Improved Aerodynamic Load Performance of Wind Turbines With Smart Rotors

Currently, there is significant research into the inclusion of smart devices in wind turbine rotor blades, with the aim, in conjunction with collective and individual pitch control, of improving the aerodynamic performance of the rotors. The main objective is to reduce fatigue loads, although mitigating the effects of extreme loads is also of interest. The aerodynamic loads on a wind turbine blade have periodic and nonperiodic components, and the nature of these strongly suggests the application of iterative learning control. This paper employs a simple computational fluid dynamics model to represent flow past an airfoil and uses this to undertake a detailed investigation into the level of control possible by, as in other areas, combining iterative learning control with classical control action with emphasis on how performance can be effectively measured.

[1]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[2]  O. Tutty,et al.  Construction and validation of a discrete vortex method for the two-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1994 .

[3]  Kevin L. Moore,et al.  Iterative Learning Control: Brief Survey and Categorization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[4]  Michel Verhaegen,et al.  LPV identification of an aeroelastic flutter model , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[5]  J. Anderson,et al.  Fundamentals of Aerodynamics , 1984 .

[6]  A.G. Alleyne,et al.  A survey of iterative learning control , 2006, IEEE Control Systems.

[7]  Raymond Chow,et al.  On the temporal response of active load control devices , 2010 .

[8]  Matthew A. Lackner,et al.  A comparison of smart rotor control approaches using trailing edge flaps and individual pitch control , 2009 .

[9]  Lucy Pao,et al.  Comparison of wind turbine operating transitions through the use of iterative learning control , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference.

[10]  I. Houtzager,et al.  Towards Data-Driven Control for Modern Wind Turbines , 2011 .

[11]  Matthew A. Lackner,et al.  The Performance of Wind Turbine Smart Rotor Control Approaches During Extreme Loads , 2010 .

[12]  Scott J. Johnson,et al.  Active load control techniques for wind turbines. , 2008 .

[13]  Jianfei Dong,et al.  Data Driven Fault Detection and Isolation of a Wind Turbine Benchmark , 2011 .

[14]  D. M. Somers S825 and S826 Airfoils: 1994--1995 , 2005 .

[15]  S C Thomsen,et al.  Stochastic wind turbine control in multiblade coordinates , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[16]  Scott J. Johnson,et al.  An overview of active load control techniques for wind turbines with an emphasis on microtabs , 2010 .

[17]  Mac Gaunaa,et al.  Load reduction using pressure difference on airfoil for control of trailing edge flaps , 2009 .

[18]  Walter Musial,et al.  Trends in the Design, Manufacture and Evaluation of Wind Turbine Blades , 2003 .

[19]  G.A.M. van Kuik,et al.  Review of state of the art in smart rotor control research for wind turbines , 2010 .

[20]  Christian Bak,et al.  Wind tunnel test on airfoil Riso-B1-18 with an Active Trailing Edge Flap , 2010 .

[21]  Christian Bak,et al.  Deformable trailing edge flaps for modern megawatt wind turbine controllers using strain gauge sensors , 2010 .