Detecting affective covert user states with passive brain-computer interfaces

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) provide insight into ongoing cognitive and affective processes and are commonly used for direct control of human-machine systems [16]. Recently, a different type of BCI has emerged [4, 17], which instead focuses solely on the non-intrusive recognition of mental state elicited by a given primary human-machine interaction. These so-called passive BCIs (pBCIs) do, by their nature, not disturb the primary interaction, and thus allow for enhancement of human-machine systems with relatively low usage cost [12,18], especially in conjunction with gel-free sensors. Here, we apply pBCIs to detect cognitive processes containing covert user states, which are difficult to access with conventional exogenous measures. We present two variants of a task inspired by an erroneously adapting human-machine system, a scenario important in automated adaptation. In this context, we derive two related, yet complementary, applications of pBCIs. First, we show that pBCIs are capable of detecting a covert user state related to the perception of loss of control over a system. The detection is realized by exploiting non-stationarities induced by the loss of control. Second, we show that pBCIs can be used to detect a covert user state directly correlated to the user's interpretation of erroneous actions of the machine. We then demonstrate the use of this information to enhance the interaction between the user and the machine, in an experiment outside the laboratory.

[1]  J J Vidal,et al.  Toward direct brain-computer communication. , 1973, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[4]  D. Woods,et al.  Automation Surprises , 2001 .

[5]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Classifying Single Trial EEG: Towards Brain Computer Interfacing , 2001, NIPS.

[6]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Boosting bit rates and error detection for the classification of fast-paced motor commands based on single-trial EEG analysis , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Speeding up classification of multi-channel brain-computer interfaces: common spatial patterns for slow cortical potentials , 2003, First International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2003. Conference Proceedings..

[8]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[9]  Guido Dornhege,et al.  Increasing information transfer rates for brain-computer interfacing , 2006 .

[10]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  MATHEMATICAL ENGINEERING TECHNICAL REPORTS Spectrally weighted Common Spatial Pattern algorithm for single trial EEG classification , 2006 .

[11]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Towards adaptive classification for BCI , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[12]  Edward Cutrell,et al.  BCI for passive input in HCI , 2007 .

[13]  Matthias Rötting,et al.  Team PhyPA : Developing applications for Brain-Computer Interaction , 2007 .

[14]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The non-invasive Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[15]  J. Millán,et al.  Error-related EEG potentials in brain-computer interfaces , 2007 .

[16]  Sandra Trösterer,et al.  Implicit Interaction in Multimodal Human-Machine Systems , 2009 .