On Using Summary Statistics From an External Calibration Sample to Correct for Covariate Measurement Error

Background: Covariate measurement error is common in epidemiologic studies. Current methods for correcting measurement error with information from external calibration samples are insufficient to provide valid adjusted inferences. We consider the problem of estimating the regression of an outcome Y on covariates X and Z, where Y and Z are observed, X is unobserved, but a variable W that measures X with error is observed. Information about measurement error is provided in an external calibration sample where data on X and W (but not Y and Z) are recorded. Methods: We describe a method that uses summary statistics from the calibration sample to create multiple imputations of the missing values of X in the regression sample, so that the regression coefficients of Y on X and Z and associated standard errors can be estimated using simple multiple imputation combining rules, yielding valid statistical inferences under the assumption of a multivariate normal distribution. Results: The proposed method is shown by simulation to provide better inferences than existing methods, namely the naive method, classical calibration, and regression calibration, particularly for correction for bias and achieving nominal confidence levels. We also illustrate our method with an example using linear regression to examine the relation between serum reproductive hormone concentrations and bone mineral density loss in midlife women in the Michigan Bone Health and Metabolism Study. Conclusions: Existing methods fail to adjust appropriately for bias due to measurement error in the regression setting, particularly when measurement error is substantial. The proposed method corrects this deficiency.

[1]  S. Greenland,et al.  Exposure-measurement error is frequently ignored when interpreting epidemiologic study results , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[2]  Raymond J Carroll,et al.  A comparison of regression calibration, moment reconstruction and imputation for adjusting for covariate measurement error in regression , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  B. Whitcomb,et al.  Procedures for Determination of Detection Limits: Application to High-performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis of Fat-soluble Vitamins in Human Serum , 2010, Epidemiology.

[4]  Daniel McConnell,et al.  Hormone predictors of bone mineral density changes during the menopausal transition. , 2006, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[5]  A Guolo,et al.  A simulation‐based comparison of techniques to correct for measurement error in matched case–control studies , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[6]  A. U.S.,et al.  Multiple imputation when records used for imputation are not used or disseminated for analysis , 2008 .

[7]  K M Higgins,et al.  The effect of serial dilution error on calibration inference in immunoassay. , 1998, Biometrics.

[8]  Yulei He,et al.  Combining Information from Cancer Registry and Medical Records Data to Improve Analyses of Adjuvant Cancer Therapies , 2009, Biometrics.

[9]  T. Raghunathan,et al.  Combining information from multiple surveys for assessing health disparities , 2006 .

[10]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Quantifying the treatment effect explained by markers in the presence of measurement error , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective , 2006 .

[12]  S. Richardson,et al.  Conditional independence models for epidemiological studies with covariate measurement error. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  On measurement error adjustment methods in Poisson regression , 1999 .

[14]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[15]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Effect of covariate measurement error in randomized clinical trials. , 1987, Statistics in Medicine.

[16]  Nicole A. Lazar,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[17]  R. Carroll,et al.  Efficient regression calibration for logistic regression in main study/internal validation study designs with an imperfect reference instrument. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  James V. Zidek,et al.  CAUSALITY, MEASUREMENT ERROR AND MULTICOLLINEARITY IN EPIDEMIOLOGY , 1996 .

[19]  R. Little,et al.  Regression analysis with covariates that have heteroscedastic measurement error , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Approximate Quasi-likelihood Estimation in Models with Surrogate Predictors , 1990 .