Rationale and Design of the National Neuropsychology Network

Abstract Objective. The National Neuropsychology Network (NNN) is a multicenter clinical research initiative funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH; R01 MH118514) to facilitate neuropsychology’s transition to contemporary psychometric assessment methods with resultant improvement in test validation and assessment efficiency. Method: The NNN includes four clinical research sites (Emory University; Medical College of Wisconsin; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); University of Florida) and Pearson Clinical Assessment. Pearson Q-interactive (Q-i) is used for data capture for Pearson published tests; web-based data capture tools programmed by UCLA, which serves as the Coordinating Center, are employed for remaining measures. Results: NNN is acquiring item-level data from 500–10,000 patients across 47 widely used Neuropsychology (NP) tests and sharing these data via the NIMH Data Archive. Modern psychometric methods (e.g., item response theory) will specify the constructs measured by different tests and determine their positive/negative predictive power regarding diagnostic outcomes and relationships to other clinical, historical, and demographic factors. The Structured History Protocol for NP (SHiP-NP) helps standardize acquisition of relevant history and self-report data. Conclusions: NNN is a proof-of-principle collaboration: by addressing logistical challenges, NNN aims to engage other clinics to create a national and ultimately an international network. The mature NNN will provide mechanisms for data aggregation enabling shared analysis and collaborative research. NNN promises ultimately to enable robust diagnostic inferences about neuropsychological test patterns and to promote the validation of novel adaptive assessment strategies that will be more efficient, more precise, and more sensitive to clinical contexts and individual/cultural differences.

[1]  R. Bilder,et al.  Inter Organizational Practice Committee Guidance/Recommendation for Models of Care During the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic , 2020, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[2]  D. Loring,et al.  Transitioning to telehealth neuropsychology service: Considerations across adult and pediatric care settings , 2020, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[3]  R. Bilder,et al.  InterOrganizational practice committee recommendations/guidance for teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[4]  B. Cuthbert The role of RDoC in future classification of mental disorders
 , 2020, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[5]  David C. Glahn,et al.  Extensions of Multiple-Group Item Response Theory Alignment: Application to Psychiatric Phenotypes in an International Genomics Consortium , 2020, Educational and psychological measurement.

[6]  M. Tsolaki,et al.  Depression in Dementia or Dementia in Depression? Systematic Review of Studies and Hypotheses. , 2020, Current Alzheimer research.

[7]  E. Łojek,et al.  Introduction to the special issue: Are modern neuropsychological assessment methods really “modern”? Reflections on the current neuropsychological test armamentarium , 2019, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[8]  D. Drane,et al.  Knowledge of language function and underlying neural networks gained from focal seizures and epilepsy surgery , 2019, Brain and Language.

[9]  M. Kliegel,et al.  Distinct effects of cognitive versus somatic anxiety on cognitive performance in old age: the role of working memory capacity , 2018, Aging & mental health.

[10]  S. Reise,et al.  Neuropsychological tests of the future: How do we get there from here? , 2018, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[11]  J. Filoteo,et al.  Detecting Mild Cognitive Deficits in Parkinson's Disease: Comparison of Neuropsychological Tests , 2018, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[12]  Jeffrey S. Anderson,et al.  External validation of change formulae in neuropsychology with neuroimaging biomarkers: A methodological recommendation and preliminary clinical data , 2018, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[13]  D. Loring,et al.  Paradigm Shifts in the Neuropsychology of Epilepsy , 2017, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[14]  David Watson,et al.  The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A Dimensional Alternative to Traditional Nosologies , 2017, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  Jacqui Smith,et al.  Socioeconomic, Health, and Psychosocial Mediators of Racial Disparities in Cognition in Early, Middle, and Late Adulthood , 2017, Psychology and aging.

[16]  D. Barch,et al.  Common Measures for National Institute of Mental Health Funded Research , 2016, Biological Psychiatry.

[17]  L. Rabin,et al.  Stability in Test-Usage Practices of Clinical Neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada Over a 10-Year Period: A Follow-Up Survey of INS and NAN Members. , 2016, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[18]  David Kitching Depression in dementia. , 2015, Australian prescriber.

[19]  P. Bandettini,et al.  What Cascade Spreading Models Can Teach Us about the Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[20]  R. Gur,et al.  Development of an abbreviated form of the Penn Line Orientation Test using large samples and computerized adaptive test simulation. , 2015, Psychological assessment.

[21]  Taylor J. Abel,et al.  Direct Physiologic Evidence of a Heteromodal Convergence Region for Proper Naming in Human Left Anterior Temporal Lobe , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  L. Rodríguez-Mañas,et al.  Mild cognitive impairment diagnosed with the new DSM‐5 criteria: prevalence and associations with non‐cognitive psychopathology , 2015, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[23]  D. Bandeira,et al.  A systematic review of validity procedures used in neuropsychological batteries , 2013 .

[24]  G. Ojemann,et al.  Famous face identification in temporal lobe epilepsy: Support for a multimodal integration model of semantic memory , 2013, Cortex.

[25]  T. Insel,et al.  Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[26]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Distributed processing; distributed functions? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  Joanne Odenkirchen,et al.  National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Element Project – approach and methods , 2012, Clinical trials.

[28]  Grant L Iverson,et al.  Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment Devices: Joint Position Paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology , 2012, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[29]  Huaqin Pan,et al.  The PhenX Toolkit: Get the Most From Your Measures , 2011, American journal of epidemiology.

[30]  D. Loring History of neuropsychology through epilepsy eyes. , 2010, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[31]  S. Reise,et al.  Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms , 2010, Quality of Life Research.

[32]  C. Kubu,et al.  Clinical utility of the Boston Naming Test in predicting ultimate side of surgery in patients with medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: A double cross‐validation study , 2009, Epilepsia.

[33]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. , 2008, Psychiatric services.

[34]  N. Bargalló,et al.  Neuropsychological tests with lateralizing value in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: Reconsidering material-specific theory , 2005, Seizure.

[35]  J. Manly,et al.  Neuropsychological Testing: Helpful or Harmful? , 2005, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[36]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  The Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Tests: A Review of the Literature on Everyday Cognitive Skills , 2003, Neuropsychology Review.

[37]  C. Boake,et al.  Édouard Claparède and the Auditory Verbal Learning Test , 2000, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[38]  K. Meador,et al.  Effects of anomalous language representation on neuropsychological performance in temporal lobe epilepsy , 1999, Neurology.

[39]  E. Strauss,et al.  An examination of the crowding hypothesis in epileptic patients who have undergone the carotid amytal test , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Зилола Зокировна Исакова,et al.  Knowledge of Language , 2016 .

[41]  Alessandro Devigus,et al.  Toward the future. , 2014, The international journal of esthetic dentistry.

[42]  P. Monrás [Paradigm shifts]. , 2013, Revista de enfermeria.

[43]  J. Ausman,et al.  Neuropsychological tests. , 1984, Neurosurgery.