Learning from Inquiry-Based Laboratories in Nonmajor Biology: An Interpretive Study of the Relationships among Inquiry Experience, Epistemologies, and Conceptual Growth

Abstract: The use of inquiry-based laboratory in college science classes is on the rise. This studyinvestigated how five nonmajor biology students learned from an inquiry-based laboratory experience.Using interpretive data analysis, the five students’ conceptual ecologies, learning beliefs, and scienceepistemologies were explored. Findings indicated that students with constructivist learning beliefs tendedto add more meaningful conceptual understandings during inquiry labs than students with positivistlearning beliefs. All students improved their understanding of experiment in biology. Implications for theteaching of biology labs are discussed. 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 40: 986–1024, 2003 Interest in using inquiry-based teaching strategies has increased in recent years as scienceteachers have become more critical about the efficacy of cookbook-type laboratory activities andindeedthepurposes,practices,andlearningoutcomesoflaboratoryingeneral(Wellington,1998).Itisgraduallybeingrecognizedthatwhereascookbooklabscanteachsomelaboratorytechniquesandskills(Hart,Mulhall,Berry,Loughran,&Gunstone,2000)orserveasvisualaidsforconceptsalready studied (Millar, 1998), they are largely ineffective as a tool for teaching science concepts.Asstatedbyoneteacher-researcher,‘‘Inthesamewayasanyscientist,studentswillseewhattheirprior theories lead them to expect. More significantly, they will not make the meaning that we asteachers expect them to make of experimental evidence until they have already grasped thetheoretical framework that allows them to ‘see’ the evidence’’ (Hart et al., 2000, p. 659).Therefore, cookbook laboratories may work well as illustrations of concepts already studied andunderstood but it is unlikely they will lead to new conceptual learning.Many definitions ofinquiry-based labs and inquiry pedagogical models may be adapted to fitthe local context (Keys & Bryan, 2000). The authors of this report consider inquiry to be anycombination of the following activities described as inquiry by the National Science EducationStandards (National Research Council, 1996): observing objects and events, posing questions,

[1]  Audrey B. Champagne,et al.  The National Science Education Standards. , 2000 .

[2]  William J. McIntosh The National Science Education Standards as a Referent to Course Revision. , 1996 .

[3]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Supporting Learning of Variable Control in a Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of Prompting College Students to Reflect on Their Own Thinking , 1999 .

[4]  Gili Marbach-Ad,et al.  Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions , 2000 .

[5]  J. Novak,et al.  The interplay of scientific epistemological views, learning strategies, and attitudes of college students , 1993 .

[6]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  "Laboratory Exercises Help Me Memorize the Scientific Truths": A Study of Eighth Graders' Scientific Epistemological Views and Learning in Laboratory Activities , 1999 .

[7]  Linda S. Lotto Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[8]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  An Analysis of Scientific Epistemological Beliefs and Learning Orientations of Taiwanese Eighth Graders , 1998 .

[9]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[10]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[11]  Lisa M. Blank,et al.  A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? , 2000 .

[12]  Gabriela C. Weaver,et al.  Strategies in K‐12 science instruction to promote conceptual change , 1998 .

[13]  Andrée Tiberghien,et al.  An analysis of labwork tasks used in science teaching at upper secondary school and university levels in several European countries , 2001 .

[14]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science , 1999 .

[15]  Pamela Joy Mulhall,et al.  What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? , 2000 .

[16]  Jerry Wellington,et al.  Practical Work in School Science : Which Way Now? , 1998 .

[17]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[18]  Carolyn W. Keys,et al.  Co-Constructing Inquiry-based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform. , 2001 .

[19]  Brian Hand,et al.  Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh‐grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects , 2004 .

[20]  J. Mintzes,et al.  Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology , 1997 .

[21]  Andrew Elby,et al.  On the Substance of a Sophisticated Epistemology. , 2001 .

[22]  Deborah Pomeroy Implications of Teachers' Beliefs about the Nature of Science: Comparison of the Beliefs of Scientists, Secondary Science Teachers, and Elementary Teachers. , 1993 .

[23]  Jim Garrison,et al.  Realism, Deweyan Pragmatism, and Educational Research , 1994 .

[24]  Kathleen Hogan,et al.  Relating Students' Personal Frameworks for Science Learning to Their Cognition in Collaborative Contexts. , 1999 .

[25]  M. Gail Jones,et al.  Exploring the development of conceptual ecologies : Communities of concepts related to convection and heat , 2000 .

[26]  R. Hackett Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[27]  Darrell L. Fisher,et al.  Interpersonal Behavior, Laboratory Learning Environments, and Student Outcomes in Senior Biology Classes. , 2000 .