An easy disinfection strategy for pipes connecting hemodialysis equipment

INTRODUCTION A hemodialysis room has pipes connecting the console and central fluid equipment. While these pipes require disinfection, reports detailing disinfection strategies are unavailable. Therefore, we aimed to compare two easy disinfection strategies differing in sanitization frequency and sanitizer concentration. METHODS Reverse osmosis water (ROW) purifying equipment and six dialysis consoles were connected by 20 m of pipes. Only ROW flowed through these pipes, because the dialysate solution was constituted at each console. The pipes were sanitized by two strategies: (1) strong and monthly (hypochlorite concentration: 100 ppm) or (2) weak and weekly (5 ppm). Both strategies were easy because the sodium hypochlorite was simply added to the ROW tank. To estimate sanitization efficacy, endotoxin counts at the ROW tank outlet, the end of the pipe, and the pipe after the endotoxin-cutting filter in each console were measured monthly for six continuous months. These counts were compared between the two sanitization strategies. RESULTS The endotoxin counts at the ROW tank outlet and the end of the pipe were 0.004-0.017 and 0.012-0.081 EU/mL, respectively, in the strong and monthly strategy, and 0.001-0.003 and 0.001-0.005 EU/mL, respectively, in the weak and weekly strategy. The endotoxin counts at the pipe after the endotoxin-cutting filter were less than 0.001 EU/mL during the study period in both strategies. CONCLUSION A weekly disinfection strategy was more effective than a monthly one, despite the lower hypochlorite concentration. The present study suggests that frequency is the most important factor in the disinfection of pipes in a dialysis room.

[1]  R. Serrato Lipopolysaccharides in diazotrophic bacteria , 2014, Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol..

[2]  I. Ledebo Purification of Dialysis Fluid: Historical Background and Perspective , 2009, Blood Purification.

[3]  Michael V Sefton,et al.  Endotoxin: the uninvited guest. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[4]  M. Ballestri,et al.  Biofilms Invade Nephrology: Effects in Hemodialysis , 2000, Blood Purification.

[5]  H. Kawanishi On-line continuous hemodiafiltration in sepsis. , 2006, Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis.

[6]  K. Leunissen,et al.  Prevention of biofilm formation in dialysis water treatment systems. , 2003, Kidney international.

[7]  M. Tonelli,et al.  Effect of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis vs conventional hemodialysis on left ventricular mass and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[8]  H. Izutani,et al.  Prospects for using a hemoconcentrator as an alternative hemodialysis method in cardiopulmonary bypass surgeries , 2014, Perfusion.

[9]  R. Ward,et al.  Quality management of dialysis fluid for online convective therapies. , 2011, Contributions to nephrology.

[10]  P. Vaillant,et al.  Evidence of bacterial biofilm in tubing from hydraulic pathway of hemodialysis system. , 1998, Artificial organs.

[11]  M. Bots,et al.  Microbiological quality and quality control of purified water and ultrapure dialysis fluids for online hemodiafiltration in routine clinical practice. , 2009, Kidney international.

[12]  G. Beck,et al.  In-center hemodialysis six times per week versus three times per week. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  S. Lapierre,et al.  Quality of hemodialysis water: a 7-year multicenter study. , 1995, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[14]  T. Hasegawa,et al.  Dialysis fluid endotoxin level and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis: a nationwide cohort study. , 2015, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[15]  T. Hartung,et al.  In vitro pyrogen test for toxic or immunomodulatory drugs. , 2006, Journal of immunological methods.

[16]  Z. Twardowski History of hemodialyzers' designs , 2008, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[17]  H. Izutani,et al.  Features of an alternative hemodialysis method using a hemoconcentrator during cardiopulmonary bypass surgeries , 2015, Perfusion.

[18]  T. Takasaki,et al.  Is using an open-reservoir cardiopulmonary bypass circuit after 6 days on standby safe? , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[19]  J. Perry,et al.  Fluids for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy – an Evaluation of Microbial Integrity , 2015, The International journal of artificial organs.

[20]  J. Minakuchi,et al.  Current Situation of Endotoxin Retentive Filter , 2009, Blood Purification.

[21]  F Vorbeck,et al.  Quality of water used for haemodialysis: bacteriological and chemical parameters. , 1999, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[22]  J. Vienken,et al.  Contamination of Dialysis Water and Dialysate: A Survey of 30 Centers , 1994, ASAIO journal.

[23]  C C Willhite,et al.  Chlorine dioxide and hemodialysis. , 1990, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[24]  R. Nystrand Microbiology of Water and Fluids for Hemodialysis , 2008, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA.