Scaling of Folding Properties in Go Models of Proteins

Insights about scaling of folding properties of proteins are obtained bystudying folding in heteropolymers described by Go-like Hamiltonians. Bothlattice and continuum space models are considered. In the latter case, themonomer-monomer interactions correspond to the Lennard-Jones potential.Several statistical ensembles of the two- and three-dimensional targetnative conformations are considered. Among them are maximally compactconformations which are confined to a lattice and those which are obtainedeither through quenching or annealing of homopolymers to their compactlocal energy minima. Characteristic folding times are found to grow aspower laws with the system size. The corresponding exponents are notuniversal. The size related deterioration of foldability is found to beconsistent with the scaling behavior of the characteristic temperatures:asymptotically, the folding temperature becomes much lower than thetemperature at which glassy kinetics become important. The helicalconformations are found to have the lowest overall scaling exponent andthe best foldability among the classes of conformations studied. Thescaling properties of the Go-like models of the protein conformationsstored in the Protein Data Bank suggest that proteins are not optimizedkinetically.

[1]  M. Karplus,et al.  Interpreting the folding kinetics of helical proteins , 1999, Nature.

[2]  J. Banavar,et al.  Master Equation Approach to Protein Folding and Kinetic Traps , 1998, cond-mat/9803019.

[3]  Haruo Abe,et al.  Noninteracting local‐structure model of folding and unfolding transition in globular proteins. II. Application to two‐dimensional lattice proteins , 1981, Biopolymers.

[4]  Marek Cieplak,et al.  Molecular dynamics of folding of secondary structures in Go-type models of proteins , 1999, cond-mat/9911488.

[5]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[6]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  From Minimal Models to Real Proteins: Time Scales for Protein Folding Kinetics , 1995 .

[7]  Marek Cieplak,et al.  Sequencing of folding events in Go-type proteins , 2000, cond-mat/0008201.

[8]  A V Finkelstein,et al.  Rate of protein folding near the point of thermodynamic equilibrium between the coil and the most stable chain fold. , 1997, Folding & design.

[9]  Cell dynamics of folding in two-dimensional model proteins. , 1997, Folding & design.

[10]  Spin analogues of proteins: scaling of `folding' properties , 1999, cond-mat/9911285.

[11]  Kremer,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation for polymers in the presence of a heat bath. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[12]  Random self-interacting chains: A mechanism for protein folding , 1991 .

[13]  S. Takada,et al.  Go-ing for the prediction of protein folding mechanisms. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000 , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Spin glasses and the statistical mechanics of protein folding. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  H. Stanley,et al.  Discrete molecular dynamics studies of the folding of a protein-like model. , 1998, Folding & design.

[17]  V. Zhdanov.  Folding time of ideal β sheets vs. chain length , 1998 .

[18]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Protein folding kinetics: timescales, pathways and energy landscapes in terms of sequence-dependent properties. , 1996, Folding & design.

[19]  M. Cieplak,et al.  Folding in two-dimensional off-lattice models of proteins , 1999, cond-mat/9908170.

[20]  E I Shakhnovich,et al.  Identifying the protein folding nucleus using molecular dynamics. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Marek Cieplak,et al.  Kinetic nonoptimality and vibrational stability of proteins , 2001, Proteins.

[22]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Mechanisms and kinetics of beta-hairpin formation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J R Banavar,et al.  Role of secondary motifs in fast folding polymers: a dynamical variational principle. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[24]  M. Cieplak,et al.  Scaling of Folding Properties in Simple Models of Proteins , 1999, cond-mat/9907269.

[25]  Cecilia Clementi,et al.  FOLDING, DESIGN, AND DETERMINATION OF INTERACTION POTENTIALS USING OFF-LATTICE DYNAMICS OF MODEL HETEROPOLYMERS , 1998 .

[26]  Camacho.  Entropic Barriers, Frustration, and Order: Basic Ingredients in Protein Folding. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[27]  Master equation approach to protein folding , 1999 .

[28]  J. Banavar,et al.  Computer Simulation of Liquids , 1988 .

[29]  M. Cieplak,et al.  PROTEIN FOLDING AND MODELS OF DYNAMICS ON THE LATTICE , 1998, cond-mat/9806182.

[30]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Backbone dynamics, fast folding, and secondary structure formation in helical proteins and peptides , 1999, Proteins.

[31]  D. Baker,et al.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Folding kinetics of proteinlike heteropolymers , 1994, cond-mat/9404001.

[33]  P. Gennes.  Kinetics of collapse for a flexible coil , 1985 .

[34]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation , 1985 .

[35]  Flavio Seno,et al.  Protein Structures and Optimal Folding from a Geometrical Variational Principle , 1998, cond-mat/9811246.

[36]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  Chain Length Scaling of Protein Folding Time. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[37]  B. Derrida.  Random-Energy Model: Limit of a Family of Disordered Models , 1980 .

[38]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Deciphering the timescales and mechanisms of protein folding using minimal off-lattice models. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[39]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Folding funnels and energy landscapes of larger proteins within the capillarity approximation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Microscopic theory of critical folding nuclei and reconfiguration activation barriers in folding proteins , 1997 .