Did you get the beat? Late proficient French-German learners extract strong–weak patterns in tonal but not in linguistic sequences

Event-related potential (ERP) data in French and German have shown that metric violations (i.e. incorrectly stressed words) in a sentence elicit a P600. Furthermore, French speakers find it difficult to discriminate stimuli that vary in word stress position and have been labelled as "stress deaf." In the current study we investigated (i) whether French late learners of German can perceive deviations of a regular strong-weak stress pattern (trochee) in German sentences, and (ii) whether the same subjects differ in their electrophysiological response from German monolinguals in a non-linguistic "subjective rhythmization" paradigm. Irrespective of the native language both groups show similar results in the latter paradigm in which isochronous stimulus trains are subjectively converted into a binary strong-weak grouped percept (trochee). However, we report differences between native and non-native speakers of German in the sentence paradigm. In contrast to German native speakers French late learners of German fail to show a P600 component in response to deviations from a regular trochaic stress pattern, although attention was directed to the metric pattern of the sentences. The current data suggest that French stress deafness selectively affects the perception of a strong-weak pattern in sentences while strong-weak grouping of non-linguistic sequences is not language specific. The results imply that linguistic and non-linguistic grouping do not rely on the same neural mechanisms.

[1]  A. Cutler,et al.  Perceptual Tests of Rhythmic Similarity: I. Mora Rhythm , 2007, Language and speech.

[2]  E. Kaan,et al.  Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Perception of rhythmic grouping depends on auditory experience. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  F. Ramus,et al.  Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal , 1999, Cognition.

[5]  R. Kronland-Martinet,et al.  Influence of syllabic lengthening on semantic processing in spoken French: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish , 2008, Cognition.

[7]  Neil P. McAngus Todd,et al.  Towards an auditory account of speech rhythm: application of a model of the auditory ‘primal sketch’ to two multi-language corpora , 2004, Cognition.

[8]  S. Kotz,et al.  Event-related potential responses to metric violations: rules versus meaning , 2010, Neuroreport.

[9]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Behavioral relevance of gamma‐band activity for short‐term memory‐based auditory decision‐making , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Impact of Proficiency on Syntactic Second-language Processing of German and Italian: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Caroline Fery Uni und Studis: die besten Wörter des Deutschen , 1997 .

[12]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[14]  Christa Brüstle Aus dem Takt : Rhythmus in Kunst, Kultur und Natur , 2005 .

[15]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[16]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  ERPs Reflect Lexical Identification in Word Fragment Priming , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Event-related Brain Potentials Suggest a Late Interaction of Meter and Syntax in the P600 , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  A. Christophe,et al.  Newborns' Cry Melody Is Shaped by Their Native Language , 2009, Current Biology.

[19]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  Sven L. Mattys,et al.  The role of perceptual salience during the segmentation of connected speech , 2009 .

[21]  M. Besson,et al.  AN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL (ERP) STUDY OF MUSICAL EXPECTANCY : COMPARISON OF MUSICIANS WITH NONMUSICIANS , 1995 .

[22]  M. Halle,et al.  Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates , 1961 .

[23]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Brain Responses in 4-Month-Old Infants Are Already Language Specific , 2007, Current Biology.

[24]  Barbara Höhle,et al.  Language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: evidence from German and French infants. , 2009, Infant behavior & development.

[25]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in native and non-native readers of English. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[26]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Event-related Potentials Reflecting the Processing of Phonological Constraint Violations , 2009, Language and speech.

[27]  C. Drake,et al.  The “Ticktock” of Our Internal Clock , 2003, Psychological science.

[28]  Franck Ramus,et al.  Perception and acquisition of linguistic rhythm by infants , 2003, Speech Commun..

[29]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEASURES OF SENSITIVITY TO VIOLATIONS IN SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR: An Event-Related Potential Investigation , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[30]  R. T. Pivik,et al.  Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic activity in research contexts. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[31]  A. Friederici,et al.  Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[32]  James Emil Flege,et al.  The Production of English Vowels by Fluent Early and Late Italian-English Bilinguals , 2002, Phonetica.

[33]  Thierry Nazzi,et al.  Early segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French: Emerging evidence for crosslinguistic differences , 2006 .

[34]  Roni Y. Granot,et al.  Differential Brain Response to Metrical Accents in Isochronous Auditory Sequences , 2005 .

[35]  D. Abercrombie,et al.  Elements of General Phonetics , 1967 .

[36]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Native and Nonnative Speakers' Processing of a Miniature Version of Japanese as Revealed by ERPs , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Peter Eisenberg,et al.  Syllabische Struktur und Wortakzent. Prinzipien der Prosodik deutscher Wörter , 1991 .

[38]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[39]  James Emil Flege,et al.  The Identification of English Consonants by Native Speakers of Italian , 2000, Phonetica.