Practices to Improve Antimicrobial Use at 47 US Hospitals the Status of the 1997 SHEA/IDSA Position Paper Recommendations

Objective. To determine the status of programs to improve antimicrobial prescribing at select US hospitals. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Participants and Setting: Pharmacy and infection control staff at all 47 hospitals participating in phase 3 of Project Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology. Results: All 47 hospitals had some programs to improve antimicrobial use, but the practices reported varied considerably. All used a formulary, and 43 (91%) used it in conjunction with at least one of the other three antimicrobial-use policies evaluated: stop orders, restriction, and criteria-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). CPGs were reported most commonly (70%), followed by stop orders (60%) and restriction policies (40%). Although consultation with an infectious disease physician (70%) or pharmacist (66%) was commonly used to influence initial antimicrobial choice, few (40%) reported a system to measure compliance with these consultations. Conclusions: In most hospitals surveyed, practices to improve antimicrobial use, although present, were inadequate based on recommendations in a Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Infectious Disease Society of America joint position paper. There is room to improve antimicrobial-use stewardship at US hospitals.

[1]  R A Weinstein,et al.  Strategies to Prevent and Control the Emergence and Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Microorganisms in Hospitals. A challenge to hospital leadership. , 1996, JAMA.

[2]  D. Bamberger,et al.  Impact of voluntary vs enforced compliance of third-generation cephalosporin use in a teaching hospital. , 1992, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  B. Kullberg,et al.  Guidelines for the prevention of antimicrobial resistance in hospitals. , 1998, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  J. Mcgowan,et al.  Control of antimicrobial resistance in the health care system. , 1997, Infectious disease clinics of North America.

[5]  T. Liesegang Effects of requiring prior authorization for selected antimicrobials: expenditures, susceptibilities, and clinical outcomes , 1998 .

[6]  T. Clemmer,et al.  A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Frank,et al.  Decrease in expenditures and selected nosocomial infections following implementation of an antimicrobial-prescribing improvement program. , 1997, Clinical performance and quality health care.

[8]  D. Gerding,et al.  Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Infectious Diseases Society of America Joint Committee on the Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance: guidelines for the prevention of antimicrobial resistance in hospitals. , 1997, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[9]  T. Cate,et al.  Effects of requiring prior authorization for selected antimicrobials: expenditures, susceptibilities, and clinical outcomes. , 1997, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[10]  R. Gaynes,et al.  Surveillance of antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in United States hospitals: project ICARE phase 2. Project Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology (ICARE) hospitals. , 1999, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[11]  Jerome J. Schentag,et al.  Benchmark analysis of strategies hospitals use to control antimicrobial expenditures. , 1996, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.