Verifying model-based alignments in the presence of uncertainty

This paper introduces a unified approach to the problem of verifying alignment hypotheses in the presence of substantial amounts of uncertainty in the predicted locations of projected model features. Our approach is independent of whether the uncertainty is distributed or bounded, and, moreover, incorporates information about the domain in a formally correct manner. Information which can be incorporated includes the error model, the distribution of background features, and the positions of the data features near each predicted model feature. Experiments are described that demonstrate the improvement over previously used methods. Furthermore, our method is efficient in that the number of operations is on the order of the number of image features that lie nearby the predicted model features.

[1]  W. Well MAP model matching , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Yehezkel Lamdan,et al.  On the error analysis of 'geometric hashing' , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  On the Verification of Hypothesized Matches in Model-Based Recognition , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Todd A. Cass,et al.  Polynomial-Time Object Recognition in the Presence of Clutter, Occlusion, and Uncertainty , 1992, ECCV.

[5]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Optimal affine-invariant point matching , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[6]  David W. Jacobs Optimal matching of planar models in 3D scenes , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Tao Daniel Alter,et al.  The role of saliency and error propagation in visual object recognition , 1995 .

[8]  Yacov Hel-Or,et al.  Absolute orientation from uncertain point data: a unified approach , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Thomas M. Breuel Model based recognition using pruned correspondence search , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Fast and robust 3D recognition by alignment , 1993, 1993 (4th) International Conference on Computer Vision.

[11]  David W. Jacobs,et al.  Error propagation in full 3D-from-2D object recognition , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A Study of Affine Matching With Bounded Sensor Error , 1992, ECCV.

[13]  A. Dale Magoun,et al.  Decision, estimation and classification , 1989 .

[14]  H. Baird Model-Based Image Matching Using Location , 1985 .

[15]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Recognizing 3D objects from 2D images: an error analysis , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[16]  R. Weiss,et al.  Combinatorial optimization applied to variable scale 2D model matching , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[18]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Gaussian error models for object recognition , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[19]  A. R. Hanson,et al.  Robust estimation of camera location and orientation from noisy data having outliers , 1989, [1989] Proceedings. Workshop on Interpretation of 3D Scenes.