Accounting for improvement: Action research on local management support

Abstract This paper reports on two longitudinal field studies of attempts to transform front line operational units (cost centers) into centers of trust that actively use operational and accounting information to achieve improvement. In most large organizations, management control tools are remnants from an earlier Taylorist era in which coordination was achieved by central plan. This form of coordination is based on the assumption that all relevant information can be transported to the top of the organization. When this assumption is no longer valid, due to the accumulation of unique operational knowledge at the base of the organization, decentralization of control is undertaken. The differentiation that follows cannot be handled properly be central systems built on standardization of information. The next step is the establishment of a management control dialogue in which the operational units are trusted, responsible partners. In this dialogue, trust serves as a medium that opens the group to assume a learning attitude. This can be achieved through support for local self-management arrangements.

[1]  Hirst Paul,et al.  Flexible specialization versus post-Fordism: theory, evidence and policy implications , 1991 .

[2]  Callie Berliner,et al.  Cost Management for Today's Advanced Manufacturing: The Cam-I Conceptual Design , 1988 .

[3]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[4]  Norman B. Macintosh,et al.  Social Software of Accounting and Information Systems , 1985 .

[5]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[6]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[7]  Robert A. Simons The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives☆ , 1990 .

[8]  Sten Jönsson,et al.  Life with a sub-contractor: New technology and management accounting , 1988 .

[9]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[10]  C. Argyris Organizational learning and management information systems , 1982, DATB.

[11]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[12]  R. Boland Beyond the objectivist and the subjectivist: Learning to read accounting as text☆ , 1989 .

[13]  H. Arendt LIFE OF THE MIND , 2022, Bipolar Faith.

[14]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Permanently Failing Organizations. , 1991 .

[15]  C. Argyris Reasoning, learning, and action : individual and organizational , 1982 .

[16]  C. Argyris The dilemma of implementing controls: The case of managerial accounting☆ , 1990 .

[17]  Sten Jönsson,et al.  Designing semi-confusing information systems for organizations in changing environments , 1978 .

[18]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[19]  Anders Grönlund,et al.  Managing for Cost Improvement in Automated Production , 1990 .