Trade-off geometries and the adaptive dynamics of two co-evolving species

Background: A recently developed geometric method makes it possible to explore how the shape of a trade-off determines the outcome of adaptive evolution in any complex model and without committing to a particular functional form of the trade-off function. Aim: Extend the method to the co-evolution of two species. (The two species may be distantly related such as a predator and its prey, or may be closely related like two strategies produced by evolutionary branching.) Results: Thresholds of the local convexity of the trade-off functions are obtained that guarantee evolutionary and convergence stability when a given species pair is singular. In contrast to the single-species case, the condition for convergence is sufficient but not necessary. Criteria for evolutionary branching generalize from the single-species case. A cross-derivative of the invasion fitness determines whether evolutionary branching is possible; this quantity is independent of the trade-offs and if it is negative at a certain species pair, then the trade-offs can be chosen such that evolutionary branching occurs at this point. Worked example: A simple predator–prey model shows how these results can be used to identify trade-off functions such that evolution leads to an evolutionarily stable species pair or to evolutionary branching in either species.

[1]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[2]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionary branching under asymmetric competition. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionary branching/speciation: contrasting results from systems with explicit or emergent carrying capacities , 2003 .

[4]  M. Doebeli,et al.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND ADAPTIVE SPECIATION: TWO SIDES OF THE SAME ECOLOGICAL COIN , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  T. Dooren,et al.  Sexual dimorphism or evolutionary branching , 2004 .

[6]  R. Levins Theory of Fitness in a Heterogeneous Environment. I. The Fitness Set and Adaptive Function , 1962, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Pierre-Henri Gouyon,et al.  Metapopulation Genetics and the Evolution of Dispersal , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[8]  An indirect approach to imply trade‐off shapes: population level patterns in resistance suggest a decreasingly costly resistance mechanism in a model insect system , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[9]  S. Ellner,et al.  ESS germination strategies in randomly varying environments. I. Logistic-type models. , 1985, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  C. Matessi,et al.  Long-term evolution of multilocus traits , 1996, Journal of mathematical biology.

[11]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[12]  T. V. Van Dooren,et al.  Adaptive walks on changing landscapes: Levins' approach extended. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  J. Metz,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[14]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments , 1968 .

[16]  P. Brakefield,et al.  Do mothers producing large offspring have to sacrifice fecundity? , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[17]  Stefan A. H. Geritz,et al.  Adaptive dynamics in diploid, sexual populations and the evolution of reproductive isolation , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of predator-prey systems: an ecological perspective , 1996, Journal of mathematical biology.

[19]  Stefan A H Geritz,et al.  Evolutionary branching and long-term coexistence of cycling predators: critical function analysis. , 2007, Theoretical Population Biology.

[20]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Trade‐Off Geometries and Frequency‐Dependent Selection , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[21]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[22]  THEORY OF FITNESS IN A HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT , 2022 .

[23]  Andrew White,et al.  The geometric theory of adaptive evolution: trade-off and invasion plots. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.