Production dynamics of intensively managed loblolly pine stands in the southern United States: a synthesis of seven long-term experiments

Results from seven long-term experiments in the southern US were summarized to understand production dynamics of intensively managed loblolly pine plantations. Replicated studies that spanned a wide range of soil and climatic conditions were established (North Carolina—NC; Georgia—GA (three sites); Florida—FL; Louisiana—LA; Oklahoma—OK). All experiments received some combination of silvicultural treatments, including fertilizer application, understory competition control, irrigation, and thinning. Accumulation of stemwood biomass at age 15 years varied among sites and ranged from 70 Mg ha � 1 (NC) to 180 Mg ha � 1 (GA). All sites that received fertilizer and weed control applications were responsive to treatments, and growth responses ranged from about 2-fold (GA) to 3.5-fold (FL) at age 15 years. Variation in fertilizer responses among sites reflected differences in soil types, inherent site quality, and stages of stand development. Site carrying capacity, expressed as maximum basal area attained in closed canopy stands, was surprisingly consistent among sites and climatic conditions, reaching 45–48 m 2 ha � 1 under the most intensive silvicultural treatments. Across studies, competition-related mortality was initiated as stand basal areas approached 30–35 m 2 ha � 1 , and annual stemwood biomass increment peaked as basal areas reached about 20– 35 m 2 ha � 1 . These data suggest that a regional maximum in stand density occurs for loblolly pine when regular fertilizer additions are made or inherent soil nutrient supply is high. Periodic density management will be required to minimize reductions in individual tree and net stand growth. Wood specific gravity at a standard ring age of 10–11 years varied both among sites and by treatment within sites, and ranged from approximately 0.45 (OK site) to 0.56 (GA sites). Maximum leaf area index (LAI) among sites varied from about 2.5 to 6.5. The relationship between stemwood biomass increment and LAI across sites was strong at LAI levels <3.0, but was considerably more variable at higher LAIs. Variation in stemwood increment at higher LAIs was substantially reduced, however, when extreme data points were removed; a logistic function explained 75% of the variation in stemwood increment across all sites. Differences in productivity among sites were not strongly related to site water balance. Taken together, these results support other work which suggests that soil nutrient availability is the dominant driver of loblolly pine productivity across its natural range. Future research should seek to better understand the mechanisms of nutrient demand, uptake and utilization efficiency in developing stands, as well as the factors controlling intraspecific tree competition. # 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Leaf Area and Above- and Belowground Growth Responses of Loblolly Pine to Nutrient and Water Additions , 1998, Forest Science.

[2]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Regional influences of soil available water-holding capacity and climate, and leaf area index on simulated loblolly pine productivity , 1999 .

[3]  M. Duryea,et al.  Forest Regeneration Manual , 1991, Forestry Sciences.

[4]  J. Haywood,et al.  Long-term trends in loblolly pine productivity and stand characteristics in response to thinning and fertilization in the West Gulf region , 2004 .

[5]  佐藤 大七郎,et al.  Forest Ecology and Management , 1999 .

[6]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Environmental Limits on Net Primary Production and Light‐Use Efficiency Across the Oregon Transect , 1994 .

[7]  K. Johnsen,et al.  Production, allocation, and stemwood growth efficiency of Pinus taeda L. stands in response to 6 years of intensive management , 2004 .

[8]  C. D. Whitesell,et al.  Stand and tree characteristics and stockability in Pinus taeda plantations in Hawaii and South Carolina , 1994 .

[9]  Henry L. Gholz,et al.  Climatic factors controlling the productivity of pine stands: a model-based analysis , 1994 .

[10]  S. B. Jack,et al.  Leaf area index and site water balance of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) across a precipitation gradient in East Texas , 1998 .

[11]  T. J. Dean,et al.  Using a Density- Management Diagram to Develop Thinning Schedules for Loblolly Pine Plantations , 1993 .

[12]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Fertilization of Southern Pines at Establishment , 1991 .

[13]  B. F. Swindel,et al.  Importance of weed control, fertilization, irrigation, and genetics in slash and loblolly pine early growth on poorly drained spodosols. , 1990 .

[14]  E. Jokela,et al.  A Density-Management Diagram for Slash Pine Plantations in the Lower Coastal Plain , 1992 .

[15]  T. J. Mullin,et al.  Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the south , 2003 .

[16]  Alexander Clark,et al.  Effect of complete competition control and annual fertilization on stem growth and canopy relations for a chronosequence of loblolly pine plantations in the lower coastal plain of Georgia , 2004 .

[17]  Joe Landsberg,et al.  Modelling forest ecosystems: state of the art, challenges, and future directions , 2003 .

[18]  E. Jokela,et al.  Needlefall, Canopy Light Interception, and Productivity of Young Intensively Managed Slash and Loblolly Pine Stands , 1991, Forest Science.

[19]  Timothy A. Martin,et al.  Stand development and production dynamics of loblolly pine under a range of cultural treatments in north-central Florida USA , 2004 .

[20]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Long term growth responses of loblolly pine to optimal nutrient and water resource availability , 2004 .

[21]  Thomas R. Fox,et al.  Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantations , 2000 .

[22]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[23]  R. Bailey,et al.  Loblolly Pine—Pushing the Limits of Growth , 2001 .

[24]  Robert B. Ferguson,et al.  The effects of spacing and thinning on stand and tree characteristics of 38-year-old loblolly pine , 2000 .

[25]  C. D. Whitesell,et al.  Stockability: A Major Factor in Productivity Differences between Pinus Taeda Plantations in Hawaii and the Southeastern United States , 1989, Forest Science.

[26]  K. Tian,et al.  Legacies of agriculture and forest regrowth in the nitrogen of old-field soils , 2000 .

[27]  J. Carlyle Relationships between nitrogen uptake, leaf area, water status and growth in an 11-year-old Pinus radiata plantation in response to thinning, thinning residue, and nitrogen fertiliser , 1998 .

[28]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Leaf Area, Stemwood Growth, and Nutrition Relationships in Loblolly Pine , 1988, Forest Science.

[29]  D. Neary,et al.  Effects of Annual Fertilization and Sustained Weed Control on Dry Matter Partitioning, Leaf Area, and Growth Efficiency of Juvenile Loblolly and Slash Pine , 1990, Forest Science.

[30]  R. Timmis,et al.  Biotechnology of Forest Yield , 1983, Science.

[31]  J. R. Saucier,et al.  Influence of initial planting density, geographic location, and species on juvenile wood formation in southern pine. , 1989 .

[32]  T. O. Kvålseth Cautionary Note about R 2 , 1985 .

[33]  Bruce C. Larson,et al.  Forest Stand Dynamics , 1990 .

[34]  W. H. Smith,et al.  The Characterization of Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation by Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) on Poor Sites1 , 1963 .

[35]  W. H. Smith,et al.  The Characterization of Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation by Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) 1 , 1966 .

[36]  T. White,et al.  Growth and leaf nutrient responses of loblolly and slash pine families to intensive silvicultural management , 2003 .

[37]  J. Haywood,et al.  Establishment treatments affect the relationships among nutrition, productivity and competing vegetation of loblolly pine saplings on a Gulf Coastal Plain site , 1998 .

[38]  T. C. Hennessey,et al.  Physiology and genetics of tree growth response to moisture and temperature stress: an examination of the characteristics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). , 1987, Tree physiology.

[39]  G. Barron‐Gafford,et al.  Biomass Partitioning and Growth Efficiency of Intensively Managed Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii Stands of Different Planting Densities , 2003, Forest Science.

[40]  R. P. Schultz,et al.  Loblolly pine: the ecology and culture of loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) , 1997 .

[41]  T. C. Hennessey,et al.  Long-term growth and ecophysiological responses of a southeastern Oklahoma loblolly pine plantation to early rotation thinning , 2004 .

[42]  N. Ledgard,et al.  Exotic trees in the Canterbury high country. , 1985 .

[43]  R. Will,et al.  Effects of annual fertilization and complete competition control on current annual increment, foliar development, and growth efficiency of different aged Pinus taeda stands , 2002 .

[44]  W. Gladstone,et al.  Large-scale planting of North Carolina loblolly pine in Arkansas and Oklahoma: a case of gain versus risk , 1984 .

[45]  L. Samuelson,et al.  Production efficiency of loblolly pine and sweetgum in response to four years of intensive management. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[46]  F. Smith,et al.  Volume increment in Pinus contorta var. latifolia: the influence of stand development and crown dynamics , 1992 .

[47]  R. K. Hermann,et al.  Douglas-fir planted forests , 2004, New Forests.

[48]  N. Comerford,et al.  Biomass development for intensively managed loblolly pine plantations growing on Spodosols in the southeastern USA , 2002 .

[49]  Robert A. Mickler,et al.  The Productivity and Sustainability of Southern Forest Ecosystems in a Changing Environment , 1998, Ecological Studies.

[50]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Forest Ecosystems: Analysis at Multiple Scales , 1985 .

[51]  D. Sprugel,et al.  Lessons from Montane Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1999 .

[52]  Harold E. Burkhart,et al.  A Linked Model for Simulating Stand Development and Growth Processes of Loblolly Pine , 1998 .

[53]  C. D. Whitesell,et al.  Growth and development of loblolly pine in a spacing trial planted in Hawaii , 2000 .

[54]  W. G. Wahlenberg Longleaf Pine: its use, ecology, regeneration, protection, growth, and management. , 1946 .

[55]  Timothy A. Martin,et al.  Effects of ontogeny and soil nutrient supply on production, allocation, and leaf area efficiency in loblolly and slash pine stands , 2000 .