Effective coding in birth defects surveillance.

Effective coding is critical to data collected by birth defects surveillance programs because subsequent use of the data depends on storage and retrieval of cases using codes. Hence, careful consideration needs to be given to the coding process. The primary goal of coding is to accurately, completely, and concisely represent infants with birth defects. Coding procedures need to accommodate the objectives of the surveillance program; for example, programs that focus on research may require different coding procedures from those that focus on linking infants to services. Several challenges exist in coding birth defects, including the need to distinguish infants with multiple defects and syndromes from those with isolated defects, and the need for strategies to code suspected defects for which confirmation is not available. Selection of a coding system by a birth defects surveillance program is central to the utility of the data collected. Most programs use a modification of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-based (ICD) systems. This paper addresses ICD-based systems and the modifications used by many birth defects surveillance programs and presents examples of the problems in interpreting birth defects data because of inappropriate coding.

[1]  B. Källén,et al.  Birth Defects Monitoring Systems , 1984 .

[2]  States Services Branch.  State birth defects surveillance programs directory, updated May 1999 , 2000 .

[3]  M. Cornel,et al.  Artefactual increasing frequency of omphaloceles in the Northern Netherlands: lessons for systematic analysis of apparent epidemics. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  M. Werler,et al.  Predictive value of minor anomalies. I. Association with major malformations. , 1987, The Journal of pediatrics.

[5]  E. Zackai,et al.  Microdeletions of chromosomal region 22q11 in patients with congenital conotruncal cardiac defects. , 1993, Journal of medical genetics.

[6]  F. Jones,et al.  International Classification of Diseases , 1978 .

[7]  P L Pearson,et al.  The Dutch Uniform Multicenter Registration system for genetic disorders and malformation syndromes. , 1997, American journal of medical genetics.

[8]  L. Holmes,et al.  Anencephaly: Changes in prenatal detection and birth status, 1972 through 1990 , 1994 .

[9]  F. Bianchi,et al.  Omphalocele and gastroschisis in Europe: a survey of 3 million births 1980-1990. EUROCAT Working Group. , 1995, American journal of medical genetics.

[10]  H. Dolk,et al.  Registries of congenital anomalies: EUROCAT. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  P. De Wals,et al.  Prevalence of neural tube defects in the province of Quebec, 1992. , 1999, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[12]  A. Spira.  Epidemiology of human reproduction. , 1986, Human reproduction.

[13]  P. Fernhoff,et al.  Impact of prenatal diagnosis on the birth prevalence of neural tube defects, Atlanta, 1990-1991. , 1995, Pediatrics.

[14]  J D Erickson,et al.  Etiologic heterogeneity of neural tube defects: clues from epidemiology. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  M. Khoury,et al.  The interaction between dysmorphology and epidemiology: methodologic issues of lumping and splitting. , 1992, Teratology.

[16]  M. Khoury,et al.  Monitoring for multiple congenital anomalies: an international perspective. , 1994, Epidemiologic reviews.

[17]  S. L. Murphy,et al.  Deaths: final data for 1996. , 1998, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[18]  T. Crombleholme,et al.  Minimal hydronephrosis in the fetus: clinical significance and implications for management. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[19]  A. Ghidini,et al.  Clinical outcome of mild fetal ventriculomegaly. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  R. Kirby,et al.  Deaths associated with renal agenesis: a population-based study of birth prevalence, case ascertainment, and etiologic heterogeneity. , 1994, Teratology.

[21]  M. Khoury,et al.  Interpretation of recurring weak associations obtained from epidemiologic studies of suspected human teratogens. , 1992, Teratology.

[22]  H. Hoyme,et al.  The vascular pathogenesis of gastroschisis: intrauterine interruption of the omphalomesenteric artery. , 1981, The Journal of pediatrics.

[23]  E. Zackai,et al.  Frequency of 22q11 deletions in patients with conotruncal defects. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  J. Cordero.  Registries of birth defects and genetic diseases. , 1992, Pediatric clinics of North America.

[25]  J. Friedman.  The use of dysmorphology in birth defects epidemiology. , 1992, Teratology.

[26]  M. Khoury,et al.  On the use of the term "syndrome" in clinical genetics and birth defects epidemiology. , 1994, American journal of medical genetics.