Force from cat soleus muscle during imposed locomotor-like movements: experimental data versus Hill-type model predictions.

Muscle is usually studied under nonphysiological conditions, such as tetanic stimulation or isovelocity movements, conditions selected to isolate specific properties or mechanisms in muscle. The purpose of this study was to measure the function of cat soleus muscle during physiological conditions, specifically a simulation of a single speed of slow walking, to determine whether the resulting force could be accurately represented by a Hill-type model. Because Hill-type models do not include history-dependent muscle properties or interactions among properties, the magnitudes of errors in predicted forces were expected to reveal whether these phenomena play important roles in the physiological conditions of this locomotor pattern. The natural locomotor length pattern during slow walking, and the action potential train for a low-threshold motor unit during slow walking, were obtained from the literature. The whole soleus muscle was synchronously stimulated with the locomotor pulse train while a muscle puller imposed the locomotor movement. The experimental results were similar to force measured via buckle transducer in freely walking animals. A Hill-type model was used to simulate the locomotor force. In a separate set of experiments, the parameters needed for a Hill-type model (force-velocity, length-tension, and stiffness of the series elastic element) were measured from the same muscle. Activation was determined by inverse computation of an isometric contraction with the use of the same locomotor stimulus pattern. During the stimulus train, the Hill-type model fit the locomotor data fairly well, with errors < 10% of maximal tetanic tension. A substantial error occurred during the relaxation phase. The model overestimated force by approximately 30% of maximal tetanic tension. A nonlinear series elastic element had little influence on the force predicted by a Hill model, yet dramatically altered the predicted muscle fiber lengths. Further experiments and modeling were performed to determine the source of errors in the Hill-type model. Isovelocity ramps were constructed to pass through a selected point in the locomotor movement with the same velocity and muscle length. The muscle was stimulated with the same locomotor pulse train. The largest errors again occurred during the relaxation phase following completion of the stimulus. Stretch during stimulation caused the Hill model to underestimate the relaxation force. Shortening movements during stimulation caused the Hill model to overestimate the relaxation force. These errors may be attributed to the effects of movement on crossbridge persistence, and/or the changing affinity of troponin for calcium between bound and unbound crossbridges, neither of which is well represented in a Hill model. Other sources of error are discussed. The model presented represents the limit of accuracy of a basic Hill-type model applied to cat soleus. The model had every advantage: the parameters were measured from the same muscle for which the locomotion was simulated and errors that could arise in the estimation of activation dynamics were avoided by inverse calculation. The accuracy might be improved by compensating for the apparent effects of velocity and length on activation. Further studies are required to determine to what degree these conclusions can be generalized to other movements and muscles.

[1]  A. Hill The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle , 1938 .

[2]  A. Hill The onset of contraction , 1949, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[3]  B. C. Abbott,et al.  The physiological cost of negative work , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  B. C. Abbott,et al.  ABSTRACTS OF MEMOIRS RECORDING WORK DONE AT THE PLYMOUTH LABORATORY THE FORCE EXERTED BY ACTIVE STRIATED MUSCLE DURING AND AFTER CHANGE OF LENGTH , 2022 .

[5]  B. R. Jewell,et al.  The mechanical properties of relaxing muscle , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  R. Close Dynamic properties of fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat during development , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  A. Huxley,et al.  The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  P. Rack,et al.  The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  F E Zajac,et al.  Catch Property in Single Mammalian Motor Units , 1970, Science.

[11]  H. Mashima,et al.  The force-load-velocity relation and the viscous-like force in the frog skeletal muscle. , 1972, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[12]  D. Levine,et al.  Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  G. E. Goslow,et al.  The cat step cycle: Hind limb joint angles and muscle lengths during unrestrained locomotion , 1973, Journal of morphology.

[14]  D. M. Lewis,et al.  Post‐tetanic effects in motor units of fast and slow twitch muscle of the cat , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  P. Rack,et al.  The short range stiffness of active mammalian muscle and its effect on mechanical properties , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  K. Edman Mechanical deactivation induced by active shortening in isolated muscle fibres of the frog. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  F. Zajac,et al.  The effect of activation history on tension production by individual muscle units , 1976, Brain Research.

[18]  D. Morgan Separation of active and passive components of short-range stiffness of muscle. , 1977, The American journal of physiology.

[19]  B. Walmsley,et al.  Forces produced by medial gastrocnemius and soleus muscles during locomotion in freely moving cats. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  L. Plaghki,et al.  The deficit of the isometric tetanic tension redeveloped after a release of frog muscle at a constant velocity , 1979, The Journal of general physiology.

[21]  G. Zahalak A distribution-moment approximation for kinetic theories of muscular contraction , 1981 .

[22]  R. Edwards,et al.  Human muscle function and fatigue. , 2008, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[23]  M. Noble,et al.  Residual force enhancement after stretch of contracting frog single muscle fibers , 1982, The Journal of general physiology.

[24]  K. Edman,et al.  Shortening induced deactivation of skinned fibres of frog and mouse striated muscle. , 1982, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[25]  U Proske,et al.  Stiffness of cat soleus muscle and tendon during activation of part of muscle. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  R. Close,et al.  Arsenazo III calcium transients and latency relaxation in frog skeletal muscle fibres at different sarcomere lengths. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  K. Edman,et al.  Differences in maximum velocity of shortening along single muscle fibres of the frog. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  L. E. Ford,et al.  Influence of partial activation on force-velocity properties of frog skinned muscle fibers in millimolar magnesium ion , 1986, The Journal of general physiology.

[29]  Michael J. O'Donovan,et al.  Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. II. Normal activity patterns. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  K. Edman Double‐hyperbolic force‐velocity relation in frog muscle fibres. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  F. Zajac Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[32]  R. Griffiths,et al.  Roles of muscle activity and load on the relationship between muscle spindle length and whole muscle length in the freely walking cat. , 1989, Progress in brain research.

[33]  H. Iwamoto,et al.  Force‐velocity relation of frog skeletal muscle fibres shortening under continuously changing load. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  G. Zahalak,et al.  Muscle activation and contraction: constitutive relations based directly on cross-bridge kinetics. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[35]  D. Morgan New insights into the behavior of muscle during active lengthening. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[36]  A. Schultz,et al.  A simple Hill element-nonlinear spring model of muscle contraction biomechanics. , 1991, Journal of applied physiology.

[37]  R. Griffiths Shortening of muscle fibres during stretch of the active cat medial gastrocnemius muscle: the role of tendon compliance. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[39]  K. Edman,et al.  Depression of tetanic force induced by loaded shortening of frog muscle fibres. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  W. Rymer,et al.  Mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle elicited by sequential ramp stretches: implications for control of muscle. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  K. Edman,et al.  Variation in myoplasmic Ca2+ concentration during contraction and relaxation studied by the indicator fluo‐3 in frog muscle fibres. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  G. Loeb,et al.  Mechanical properties of aponeurosis and tendon of the cat soleus muscle during whole‐muscle isometric contractions , 1995, Journal of morphology.

[43]  G. Shue,et al.  Muscle-joint models incorporating activation dynamics, moment-angle, and moment-velocity properties , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  D. Allen,et al.  The effect of muscle length on intracellular calcium and force in single fibres from mouse skeletal muscle. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  A. M. Krylow,et al.  Dynamic force responses of muscle involving eccentric contraction. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.