Heterogeneous Testbeds, Tools and Experiments -Measurement Requirements Perspective

Federated testbeds for future Internet experimentation have been deployed worldwide to enable large scale and diverse experiments with future Internet technologies ranging from components to complete systems. They serve the purpose of validating new solutions to identified problems and to compare them with current or other evolving solutions. The proliferation of management frameworks and in particular of measurement and monitoring tools poses often a great challenge for the experimenter. OpenLab is addressing the interoperability of testbeds at several levels. In this article we describe how the OpenLab testbeds cope with divergent measurement and monitoring requirements originating from four identified experiments that each of them has its own original research objectives.

[1]  Emin Gün Sirer,et al.  Octant: A Comprehensive Framework for the Geolocalization of Internet Hosts , 2007, NSDI.

[2]  Symeon Papavassiliou,et al.  A Cloud-Oriented Content Delivery Network Paradigm: Modeling and Assessment , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

[3]  Walid Dabbous,et al.  NEPI: using independent simulators, emulators, and testbeds for easy experimentation , 2010, OPSR.

[4]  Zhi-Li Zhang,et al.  Where Do You "Tube"? Uncovering YouTube Server Selection Strategy , 2011, 2011 Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN).

[5]  Lixia Zhang,et al.  Report from the IAB Workshop on Routing and Addressing , 2007, RFC.

[6]  Emin Gün Sirer,et al.  Meridian: a lightweight network location service without virtual coordinates , 2005, SIGCOMM '05.

[7]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  Secure and Robust Framework for ID/Locator Mapping System , 2012, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  GAIA Extended Research Infrastructure: Sensing, Connecting, and Processing the Real World , 2012, TRIDENTCOM.

[9]  Katherine Guo,et al.  Intra-cloud lightning: Building CDNs in the cloud , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[10]  Ved P. Kafle,et al.  HIMALIS: Heterogeneity Inclusion and Mobility Adaptation through Locator ID Separation in New Generation Network , 2010, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[11]  Balázs Sonkoly,et al.  Towards SmartFlow: case studies on enhanced programmable forwarding in OpenFlow switches , 2012, SIGCOMM '12.

[12]  Michael Rabinovich,et al.  Measuring a commercial content delivery network , 2011, WWW.

[13]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Social network analysis concepts in the design of wireless Ad Hoc network protocols , 2010, IEEE Network.

[14]  Serge Fdida,et al.  Future internet research and experimentation: the FIRE initiative , 2007, CCRV.

[15]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Content Delivery Networks: State of the Art, Insights, and Imperatives , 2008 .

[16]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  Identity based architecture for secure communication in future internet , 2010, DIM '10.

[17]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  Protecting digital identities in future networks , 2011, 2011 Future Network & Mobile Summit.

[18]  John Domingue,et al.  The Future of the Internet , 1999, Academia Letters.

[19]  Walid Dabbous,et al.  NEPI: An integration framework for Network Experimentation , 2011, SoftCOM 2011, 19th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks.

[20]  Symeon Papavassiliou,et al.  Socio-aware virtual network embedding , 2012, IEEE Network.

[21]  Ved P. Kafle,et al.  An ID/locator split architecture for future networks , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[22]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  Measuring and Evaluating Large-Scale CDNs , 2008 .

[23]  Attila Korösi,et al.  Brief announcement: network formation games can give rise to realistic networks , 2012, PODC '12.

[24]  Zahir Tari,et al.  MetaCDN: Harnessing 'Storage Clouds' for high performance content delivery , 2009, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[25]  Theodore B. Zahariadis,et al.  Design Principles for the Future Internet Architecture , 2012, Future Internet Assembly.

[26]  Symeon Papavassiliou,et al.  Efficient Resource Mapping Framework over Networked Clouds via Iterated Local Search-Based Request Partitioning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[27]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Content Delivery Networks , 2008 .

[28]  Gábor Rétvári,et al.  The Skeleton of the Internet , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[29]  Phuoc Tran-Gia,et al.  Future Internet research and experimentation: The G-Lab approach , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[30]  Amardeo Sarma,et al.  Identities in the Future Internet of Things , 2009, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[31]  Marco Mellia,et al.  Dissecting Video Server Selection Strategies in the YouTube CDN , 2011, 2011 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems.

[32]  Spyridon Vassilaras,et al.  Wireless Going in the Cloud: A Promising Concept or Just Marketing Hype? , 2011, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[33]  Frank Thomson Leighton Improving performance on the internet , 2009, CACM.