Honesty, Social Presence and Self-Service in Retail

Retail self-service checkouts (SCOs) can benefit consumers and retailers, providing control and autonomy to shoppers independent from staff. Recent research indicates that the lack of presence of staff may provide the opportunity for consumers to behave dishonestly. This study examined whether a social presence in the form of visual, humanlike SCO interface agents had an effect on dishonest user behaviour. Using a simulated SCO scenario, participants experienced various dilemmas in which they could financially benefit themselves undeservedly. We hypothesised that a humanlike social presence integrated within the checkout screen would receive more attention and result in fewer instances of dishonesty compared to a less humanlike agent. Our hypotheses were partially supported by the results. We conclude that companies adopting self-service technology may consider the implementation of social presence to support ethical consumer behaviour, but that more research is required to explore the mixed findings in the current study.

[1]  R. Clarke,et al.  Modeling Offenders' Decisions: A Framework for Research and Policy , 1985, Crime and Justice.

[2]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Opportunistic customer claiming during service recovery , 2010 .

[3]  N. Emery,et al.  The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze , 2000, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[4]  Ronald V. Clarke,et al.  Become a Problem-Solving Crime Analyst , 2003 .

[5]  J. Henderson.  Regarding Scenes , 2007 .

[6]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto , 2017 .

[7]  A. Beck,et al.  Scan and rob! Convenience shopping, crime opportunity and corporate social responsibility in a mobile world , 2017 .

[8]  Jun Ohya,et al.  The representation of agents: anthropomorphism, agency, and intelligence , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[9]  Jennifer L. Gregg,et al.  The Networked Minds Measure of Social Presence : Pilot Test of the Factor Structure and Concurrent Validity , 2001 .

[10]  Frank Biocca,et al.  The Effect of the Agency and Anthropomorphism on Users' Sense of Telepresence, Copresence, and Social Presence in Virtual Environments , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Futoshi Naya,et al.  Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Lee Sproull,et al.  When the Interface Is a Face , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  R. Clarke,et al.  UNDERSTANDING CRIME DISPLACEMENT: AN APPLICATION OF RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY , 1987 .

[14]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Avatars Versus Agents: A Meta-Analysis Quantifying the Effect of Agency on Social Influence , 2015, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[16]  Kangsoo Kim,et al.  The wobbly table: Increased social presence via subtle incidental movement of a real-virtual table , 2016, 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[17]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-Service environments , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[18]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Surveillance of Public Space: Cctv, Street Lighting and Crime Prevention , 1999 .

[19]  Adrian Beck,et al.  Self-scan checkouts and retail loss: Understanding the risk and minimising the threat , 2011 .

[20]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[21]  Graham I. Johnson,et al.  Dishonest Behavior at Self-Service Checkouts , 2015, HCI.

[22]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[23]  B. Velichkovsky,et al.  Time course of information processing during scene perception: The relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration , 2005 .

[24]  DjamasbiSoussan,et al.  Online Viewing and Aesthetic Preferences of Generation Y and the Baby Boom Generation , 2011 .

[25]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  The Value of Believing in Free Will , 2008, Psychological science.

[26]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Online Viewing and Aesthetic Preferences of Generation Y and the Baby Boom Generation: Testing User Web Site Experience Through Eye Tracking , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[27]  R. Kraut.  Deterrent and Definitional Influences on Shoplifting , 1976 .

[28]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Do Pictures of Faces, and Which Ones, Capture Attention in the Inattentional-Blindness Paradigm? , 2009, Perception.

[29]  M. Bateson,et al.  Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting , 2006, Biology Letters.

[30]  Shanyang Zhao,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy of Copresence , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[31]  Arvid Kappas,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior Online: A Focus on Interactions with and via Artificial Agents and Avatars , 2015 .

[32]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .

[33]  Andrew T Duchowski,et al.  A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[34]  S. Baron-Cohen.  How to build a baby that can read minds: Cognitive mechanisms in mindreading. , 1994 .

[35]  Graham I. Johnson,et al.  The behavioural impact of a visually represented virtual assistant in a self-service checkout context , 2011, BCS HCI.

[36]  D. Gefen,et al.  Consumer trust in B2C e-Commerce and the importance of social presence: experiments in e-Products and e-Services , 2004 .

[37]  Graham I. Johnson,et al.  Social Presence and Dishonesty: Perceptions from Security Guards , 2017, HCI.

[38]  J. Antes.  The time course of picture viewing. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  D. Romano,et al.  BASIC: A Believable Adaptable Socially Intelligent Character for Social Presence , 2005 .

[40]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Cooperating with life-like interface agents , 1999 .

[41]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[42]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  "It doesn't matter what you are!" Explaining social effects of agents and avatars , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Geoffrey B. Duggan,et al.  Text skimming: the process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[44]  Johannes Keller,et al.  The watching eyes phenomenon: The role of a sense of being seen and public self‐awareness , 2015 .

[45]  Robin J. S. Sloan,et al.  Animated Virtual Agents to Cue User Attention Comparison of static and dynamic deictic cues on gaze and touch responses , 2011 .

[46]  Christopher E. Peters.  Direction of Attention Perception for Conversation Initiation in Virtual Environments , 2005, IVA.

[47]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[48]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual Expertise as a Shift From Strategic Interference to Automatic Holistic Processing , 2011, Current directions in psychological science.

[49]  H. Hlavacs,et al.  Virtual social support buffers stress response: An experimental comparison of real-life and virtual support prior to a social stressor. , 2019, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[50]  A. Kostić,et al.  The social psychology of nonverbal communication , 2015 .

[51]  R. Baumeister.  A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[52]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[53]  Emmeline Taylor,et al.  Supermarket self-checkouts and retail theft: The curious case of the SWIPERS , 2016 .

[54]  Helmut Hlavacs,et al.  Meeting others virtually in a day-to-day setting: Investigating social avoidance and prosocial behavior towards avatars and agents , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  Laura Aymerich-Franch,et al.  Can We Identify with a Block? Identification with Non-anthropomorphic Avatars in Virtual Reality Games , 2012 .

[56]  David P. Farrington,et al.  Security Guards, Place Managers, and Defensible Space , 2009 .

[57]  M. Bar,et al.  Exploring the unconscious using faces , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[59]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[60]  L. Pessoa.  To what extent are emotional visual stimuli processed without attention and awareness? , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[61]  T. Koda,et al.  Agents with faces: the effect of personification , 1996, Proceedings 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. RO-MAN'96 TSUKUBA.

[62]  A. Lindblom,et al.  The perceived effectiveness of surveillance in reducing crime at shopping centers in Finland , 2010 .

[63]  Candy Carmel-Gilfilen,et al.  Bridging security and good design: Understanding perceptions of expert and novice shoplifters , 2013 .

[64]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[65]  S. Baron-Cohen.  The Maladapted Mind : Classic Readings in Evolutionary Psychopathology , 1997 .