Engineering Sustainable Energy Systems: How Reactive and Predictive Homeostatic Control Can Prepare Electric Power Systems for Environmental Challenges

Abstract Nowadays electric power generation and distribution systems are being faced with a number of challenges and concerns which emanate not so much from a shortage of energy supply but from environmental and operational issues. They are required to respond to such challenges very rapidly and effectively so as to preserve stability and continuity of operations at any time, regardless of what may occur in the surroundings. This in fact is the true measure of what sustainable energy systems (SES) are all about, and homeostatic control (HC) of energy systems seeks just that: to enable energy systems to become highly efficient and effective very rapidly, by attaining a state of equilibrium between energy supply and energy expenditure in electric power systems (EPS) operation. To accomplish so they ought to imitate homeostasis mechanisms present in all living organisms. Ever since Cannon (1929, 1935) first introduced the concept, attention on homeostasis and its applications have been the sole patrimony of medicine and biology to find cures for diseases like diabetes and obesity. Nevertheless, homeostasis is rather an engineering concept in its very essence―even more so than in the natural sciences―and its application in the design and engineering of sustainable hybrid energy systems (SHES) is a reality. In this paper we present the groundwork that supports the theoretical model underlining the engineering of homeostasis in SHES. Homeostasis mechanisms are present in all living organisms, and thus are also applicable to EPS in order to enable and maintain a sustainable performance when EPS are linked to energy efficiency (EE) and thriftiness. In doing so, both reactive and predictive homeostasis play a substantive role in the engineering of such mechanisms. Reactive homeostasis (RH) is an immediate response of the SES to a homeostatic challenge such as energy deprivation, energy shortage or imbalance. RH entails feedback mechanisms that allow for reactive compensation, reestablishing homeostasis or efficient equilibrium in the system. Predictive homeostasis (PH), on the other hand, is a proactive mechanism which anticipates the events that are likely to occur, sending the right signals to the central controller, enabling SES to respond early and proactively to environmental challenges and concerns. The paper explores both concepts based on previous work in order to advance the research in the field of HC applied to electric power systems.

[1]  W. Cannon ORGANIZATION FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL HOMEOSTASIS , 1929 .

[2]  Felisa M. Córdova,et al.  Homeostatic Control of Sustainable Energy Grid Applied to Natural Disasters , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[3]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  Building sustainable energy systems: Homeostatic control of grid-connected microgrids, as a means to reconcile power supply and energy demand response management , 2014 .

[4]  Antonio Sánchez-Squella,et al.  Impact of Residential Photovoltaic Generation in Smart Grid Operation: Real Example , 2015, ITQM.

[5]  F. M. Cordova,et al.  Homeostatic control in grid-connected micro-generation power systems: A means to adapt to changing scenarios while preserving energy sustainability , 2013, 2013 International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC).

[6]  W. Cannon,et al.  STRESSES AND STRAINS OF HOMEOSTASIS , 1935 .

[7]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  Homeostatic control, smart metering and efficient energy supply and consumption criteria: A means to building more sustainable hybrid micro-generation systems , 2014 .

[8]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Agent-based homeostatic control for green energy in the smart grid , 2011, TIST.

[9]  Kevin B. Jones,et al.  The Urban Microgrid: Smart Legal and Regulatory Policies to Support Electric Grid Resilienccy and Climate Mitigation , 2016 .

[10]  H.T. Vollkommer,et al.  Application of an Intelligent Static Switch to the Point of Common Coupling to Satisfy IEEE 1547 Compliance , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[11]  James L. Kirtley,et al.  Homeostatic control : the utilitycustomer marketplace for electric power , 1981 .

[12]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  An Exergy and Homeostatic Control Approach to Sustainable Grid-Connected Microgrids without Energy Storage , 2014 .

[13]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  Only Connect: Microgrids for Distribution System Restoration , 2014, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[14]  Felisa M. Córdova,et al.  Sustainable Hybrid Energy Systems: An Energy and Exergy Management Approach with Homeostatic Control of Microgrids , 2015, ITQM.

[15]  Amin Khodaei,et al.  Resiliency-Oriented Microgrid Optimal Scheduling , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[16]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  Business optimal design of a grid-connected hybrid PV (photovoltaic)-wind energy system without energy storage for an Easter Island's block , 2013 .

[17]  F. C. Schweppe,et al.  Power/energy: Homeostatic control for electric power usage: A new scheme for putting the customer in the control loop would exploit microprocessors to deliver energy more efficiently , 1982, IEEE Spectrum.

[18]  Enzo Sauma,et al.  Review of grid-tie micro-generation systems without energy storage: Towards a new approach to sustainable hybrid energy systems linked to energy efficiency , 2013 .

[19]  Fred Schweppe,et al.  Homeostatic Utility Control , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.