Crossing the health IT chasm: considerations and policy recommendations to overcome current challenges and enable value-based care

While great progress has been made in digitizing the US health care system, today's health information technology (IT) infrastructure remains largely a collection of systems that are not designed to support a transition to value-based care. In addition, the pursuit of value-based care, in which we deliver better care with better outcomes at lower cost, places new demands on the health care system that our IT infrastructure needs to be able to support. Provider organizations pursuing new models of health care delivery and payment are finding that their electronic systems lack the capabilities needed to succeed. The result is a chasm between the current health IT ecosystem and the health IT ecosystem that is desperately needed.In this paper, we identify a set of focal goals and associated near-term achievable actions that are critical to pursue in order to enable the health IT ecosystem to meet the acute needs of modern health care delivery. These ideas emerged from discussions that occurred during the 2015 American Medical Informatics Association Policy Invitational Meeting. To illustrate the chasm and motivate our recommendations, we created a vignette from the multistakeholder perspectives of a patient, his provider, and researchers/innovators. It describes an idealized scenario in which each stakeholder's needs are supported by an integrated health IT environment. We identify the gaps preventing such a reality today and present associated policy recommendations that serve as a blueprint for critical actions that would enable us to cross the current health IT chasm by leveraging systems and information to routinely deliver high-value care.

[1]  G. Henderson,et al.  Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey , 2013, Genome Medicine.

[2]  Robert S. Huckman,et al.  The Untapped Potential of Health Care APIs , 2015 .

[3]  Subha Madhavan,et al.  An informatics research agenda to support precision medicine: seven key areas , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Adi Ignatius,et al.  Time to kill forced rankings , 2015 .

[5]  Peter J. Embi,et al.  Physicians' perceptions of an electronic health record-based clinical trial alert approach to subject recruitment: A survey , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[6]  Kensaku Kawamoto,et al.  Key principles for a national clinical decision support knowledge sharing framework: synthesis of insights from leading subject matter experts , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  Lena Mamykina,et al.  The future state of clinical data capture and documentation: a report from AMIA's 2011 Policy Meeting , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  L. Casalino,et al.  US Physician Practices Spend More Than $15.4 Billion Annually To Report Quality Measures. , 2016, Health affairs.

[9]  Peter Basch,et al.  Revisiting E&M visit guidelines--a missing piece of payment reform. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Joshua C Denny,et al.  Evaluating electronic health record data sources and algorithmic approaches to identify hypertensive individuals , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  Adam Wright,et al.  A highly scalable, interoperable clinical decision support service. , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[12]  Joel Tsevat,et al.  Commentary: the relative research unit: providing incentives for clinician participation in research activities. , 2012, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  Keith Marsolo,et al.  Challenges in creating an opt-in biobank with a registrar-based consent process and a commercial EHR , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  Philip R. O. Payne,et al.  Evidence generating medicine: redefining the research-practice relationship to complete the evidence cycle. , 2013, Medical care.

[15]  F. Collins,et al.  A new initiative on precision medicine. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Han Yin,et al.  ‘Learn From Every Patient’: implementation and early results of a learning health system , 2017, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[17]  Yoshio Nakata,et al.  Accuracy of Wearable Devices for Estimating Total Energy Expenditure: Comparison With Metabolic Chamber and Doubly Labeled Water Method. , 2016, JAMA internal medicine.

[18]  Ahima Fundamentals of the Legal Health Record and Designated Record Set , 2011 .

[19]  L. Kux OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration , 2014 .

[20]  Michael A. Barnes,et al.  Comparison of accuracy of physical examination findings in initial progress notes between paper charts and a newly implemented electronic health record , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[21]  Francis S. Collins,et al.  Toward a New Era of Trust and Transparency in Clinical Trials. , 2016, JAMA.

[22]  R. Hornung,et al.  Effect of a clinical trial alert system on physician participation in trial recruitment. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  Beatrice Podtschaske,et al.  Engaging patients through open notes: an evaluation using mixed methods , 2016, BMJ Open.

[24]  Peter J. Embi,et al.  Evaluating alert fatigue over time to EHR-based clinical trial alerts: findings from a randomized controlled study , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  Maria A. Woodward,et al.  Agreement of Ocular Symptom Reporting Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Medical Records , 2017, JAMA ophthalmology.