Corneal Stromal Demarcation Line Depth Following Standard and a Modified High Intensity Corneal Cross-linking Protocol.

PURPOSE To compare the corneal stromal demarcation line depth using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) after corneal cross-linking (CXL) using two different treatment protocols: the standard Dresden protocol (30 minutes with 3 mW/cm(2)) and a modified high intensity protocol (7 minutes with 18 mW/cm(2)), corresponding to a total surface dose of 5.4 and 7.5 J/cm(2), respectively. METHODS This prospective, comparative, interventional case series included 29 keratoconic patients (32 eyes). All patients underwent CXL using the same high intensity ultraviolet-A (UV-A) irradiation device (CCL-365; Peschke Meditrade GmbH, Huenenberg, Switzerland). Sixteen eyes were treated for 30 minutes with 3 mW/cm(2) according to the standard Dresden protocol, whereas 16 eyes were treated with a novel modified high intensity CXL protocol for 7 minutes with 18 mW/cm(2) of UV-A irradiation intensity. One month postoperatively, corneal stromal demarcation line depth was measured by two independent observers using AS-OCT. RESULTS There was no significant difference in corneal stromal demarcation line depth between observer measurements for both groups (P = .645, Dresden protocol group; P = .715, high intensity group). Mean corneal stromal demarcation line depth was 341.81 ± 47.02 µm for the Dresden protocol group and 313.37 ± 48.85 µm for the high intensity protocol group. There was no statistically significant difference (P = .104) in the corneal stromal demarcation line depth between the two groups. Mean endothelial cell density did not change significantly in either group (P = .090, Dresden protocol group; P = .103, high intensity group). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS Corneal stromal demarcation line depth using UV-A irradiance with 3 mW/cm(2) for 30 minutes and 18 mW/cm(2) for 7 minutes was similar. It seems that the current modified accelerated CXL protocol provided the same treatment depth as the standard Dresden protocol.

[1]  F. Hafezi,et al.  Long-term Results of an Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking Protocol (18 mW/cm2) for the Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  F. Raiskup,et al.  Reply: To PMID 25532633. , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  M. Tsilimbaris,et al.  Corneal Stromal Demarcation Line Determined With Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Following a Very High Intensity Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Protocol , 2015, Cornea.

[4]  F. Raiskup,et al.  Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet‐A light in progressive keratoconus: Ten‐year results , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  F. Raiskup,et al.  Evaluation of corneal stromal demarcation line depth following standard and a modified-accelerated collagen cross-linking protocol. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  C. Tappeiner,et al.  Corneal cross-linking in keratoconus using the standard and rapid treatment protocol: differences in demarcation line and 12-month outcomes. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  G. Kymionis,et al.  Long-term Follow-up of Corneal Collagen Cross-linking for Keratoconus—The Cretan Study , 2014, Cornea.

[8]  G. Kymionis,et al.  Corneal stroma demarcation line after standard and high‐intensity collagen crosslinking determined with anterior segment optical coherence tomography , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  G. Kymionis,et al.  Correlation of the corneal collagen cross-linking demarcation line using confocal microscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography in keratoconic patients. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  F. Hafezi,et al.  The Biomechanical Effect of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (CXL) With Riboflavin and UV-A is Oxygen Dependent. , 2013, Translational vision science & technology.

[11]  G. Kymionis,et al.  Evaluation of the Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Demarcation Line Profile Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography , 2013, Cornea.

[12]  Jeremy Wernli,et al.  The efficacy of corneal cross-linking shows a sudden decrease with very high intensity UV light and short treatment time. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  Tos T. J. M. Berendschot,et al.  Use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography to study corneal changes after collagen cross-linking. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Farhad Hafezi,et al.  Corneal Cross-Linking-Induced Stromal Demarcation Line , 2006, Cornea.

[15]  T. Seiler,et al.  Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  A. Schindl,et al.  [Reciprocity regulation in photobiology. An overview]. , 2001, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[17]  G. Barnes,et al.  Characterization of the reciprocity law failure in three mammography screen-film systems. , 1999, Medical physics.

[18]  R. Doherty Long term follow up , 1999, BMJ.

[19]  J W Goodman,et al.  Holographic reciprocity law failure. , 1984, Applied optics.

[20]  L. W. Grossman,et al.  Film reciprocity law failure in scintillation camera imaging. , 1981, Radiology.