This paper studies the stability of price competition in a horizontally differentiated duopoly. The firms' demand is derived from a distribution of consumer preferences. This description of the consumer sector is applicable to a large class of differentiated commodity markets, including spatial competition models. We show that there is a (pure) price setting equilibrium when consumer tastes are sufficiently dispersed. Further conditions on the dispersedness of preferences guarantee uniqueness of the equilibrium. In addition, we examine the relation between consumer preferences and the competitiveness and efficiency of the equilibrium outcome. This paper investigates the stability of price competition in a horizontally differentiated duopoly. The duopolists' demand is derived from a distribution of preference characteristics over the population of consumers. We show that competition between the firms results in a (pure) price equilibrium when consumer tastes are sufficiently dispersed. The competitiveness of the equilibrium is closely related to the diversity of consumer types. When the support of the preference distribution shrinks to a single point, the equilibrium approaches the Bertrand outcome of a homogeneous good market. We further show that a sufficient degree of preference dispersion guarantees uniqueness of the equilibrium. Finally, we discuss the firms' incentives for product differentiation from the viewpoint of social efficiency. The attractiveness of Bertrand's (1883) approach to the theory of oligopoly lies in the fact that in his model prices are chosen by economic agents rather than by a fictitious auctioneer. Yet, modelling price competition leads to a number of problems, especially with homogeneous goods. As already Bertrand (1883) observed, in the case of equally efficient firms and constant marginal costs the price setting equilibrium coincides with the competitive outcome. This extreme prediction, that holds even with only two firms, appears paradoxical and economically uninteresting for oligopolistic competition. In the absence of the constant returns to scale assumption, the Bertrand model faces up to a further drawback, namely the problem of nonexistence of equilibrium. This problem was first pointed out by Edgeworth (1925) in his analysis of a capacity constrained oligopoly. In his famous article on the stability of competition, Hotelling (1929) took the view that these problems originate in the abstraction of homogeneous goods. Under this assump
[1]
Jacques-François Thisse,et al.
On hotelling's "Stability in competition"
,
1979
.
[2]
W. Novshek.
Equilibrium in simple spatial (or differentiated product) models
,
1980
.
[3]
Michael Sattinger,et al.
Value of an Additional Firm in Monopolistic Competition
,
1984
.
[4]
E. Maskin,et al.
The Existence of Equilibrium in Discontinuous Economic Games, II: Applications
,
1986
.
[5]
Carolyn Pitchik,et al.
Equilibrium in Hotelling's Model of Spatial Competition
,
1987
.
[6]
Andreu Mas-Colell,et al.
A model of equilibrium with differentiated commodities
,
1975
.
[7]
A. Dixit,et al.
Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity
,
1977
.
[8]
Helmut Bester,et al.
Noncooperative Bargaining and Spatial Competition
,
1989
.
[9]
Andrew Caplin,et al.
Aggregation and Imperfect Competition: On the Existence of Equilibrium
,
1991
.
[10]
Phillip J. Lederer,et al.
Competition of Firms: Discriminatory Pricing and Location
,
1986
.
[11]
Y. Shilony.
Mixed pricing in oligopoly
,
1977
.
[12]
J. Perloff,et al.
Equilibrium with Product Differentiation
,
1984
.
[13]
Raymond Deneckere,et al.
Monopolistic Competition and Preference Diversity
,
1992
.
[14]
Jacques-François Thisse,et al.
The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Holds under Sufficient Heterogeneity
,
1985
.
[15]
K. Lancaster.
A New Approach to Consumer Theory
,
1966,
Journal of Political Economy.
[16]
A. Shaked,et al.
Relaxing price competition through product differentiation
,
1982
.
[17]
Jacques-François Thisse,et al.
A representative consumer theory of the logit model
,
1988
.
[18]
H. Varian.
A Model of Sales
,
1980
.
[19]
M. Spence.
Product Selection, Fixed Costs, and Monopolistic Competition
,
1976
.
[20]
S. Salop.
Monopolistic competition with outside goods
,
1979
.
[21]
J. Pratt.
RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government.
,
1964
.